Plant defense syndromes.

Given that a plant's defensive strategy against herbivory is never likely to be a single trait, we develop the concept of plant defense syndromes, where association with specific ecological interactions can result in convergence on suites of covarying defensive traits. Defense syndromes can be studied within communities of diverse plant species as well as within clades of closely related species. In either case, theory predicts that plant defense traits can consistently covary across species, due to shared evolutionary ancestry or due to adaptive convergence. We examined potential defense syndromes in 24 species of milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) in a field experiment. Employing phylogenetically independent contrasts, we found few correlations between seven defensive traits, no bivariate trade-offs, and notable positive correlations between trichome density and latex production, and between C:N ratio and leaf toughness. We then used a hierarchical cluster analysis to produce a phenogram of defense trait similarity among the 24 species. This analysis revealed three distinct clusters of species. The defense syndromes of these species clusters are associated with either low nutritional quality or a balance of higher nutritional quality coupled with physical or chemical defenses. The phenogram based on defense traits was not congruent, however, with a molecular phylogeny of the group, suggesting convergence on defense syndromes. Finally, we examined the performance of monarch butterfly caterpillars on the 24 milkweed species in the field; monarch growth and survival did not differ on plants in the three syndromes, although multiple regression revealed that leaf trichomes and toughness significantly reduced caterpillar growth. The discovery of convergent plant defense syndromes can be used as a framework to ask questions about how abiotic environments, communities of herbivores, and biogeography are associated with particular defense strategies of plants.

[1]  P. Coley,et al.  Interspecific variation in plant anti-herbivore properties: the role of habitat quality and rate of disturbance , 2008 .

[2]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe , 2006, Artificial Life.

[3]  M Henry H Stevens,et al.  The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. , 2006, Ecology.

[4]  L. Brower,et al.  Cardenolide fingerprint of monarch butterflies reared on common milkweed,Asclepias syriaca L. , 1989, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[5]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Natural selection on common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) by a community of specialized insect herbivores , 2005 .

[6]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Polymorphic buttonwood: effects of disturbance on resistance to herbivores in green and silver morphs of a Bahamian shrub. , 2004, American journal of botany.

[7]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollination Syndromes and Floral Specialization , 2004 .

[8]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[9]  D. Soltis,et al.  Further Resolution of the Rapid Radiation of Saxifragales (Angiosperms, Eudicots) Supported by Mixed-Model Bayesian Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  A. Agrawal,et al.  COMMUNITY‐WIDE IMPACTS OF HERBIVORE‐INDUCED PLANT RESPONSES IN MILKWEED (ASCLEPIAS SYRIACA) , 2004 .

[11]  A. Agrawal RESISTANCE AND SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MILKWEED: COMPETITION, ROOT HERBIVORY, AND PLANT GENETIC VARIATION , 2004 .

[12]  POPULATION VARIATION IN THE COST AND BENEFIT OF TOLERANCE AND RESISTANCE AGAINST HERBIVORY IN DATURA STRAMONIUM , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  K. Oberhauser,et al.  Compensatory Feeding in Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Response to Variation in Host Plant Quality , 2004 .

[14]  P. Coley,et al.  Herbivores Promote Habitat Specialization by Trees in Amazonian Forests , 2004, Science.

[15]  K. Linsenmair,et al.  Evolutionary change from induced to constitutive expression of an indirect plant resistance , 2004, Nature.

[16]  J. Thomson,et al.  ‘Anti‐bee’ and ‘pro‐bird’ changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  A. Agrawal Plant Defense and Density Dependence in the Population Growth of Herbivores , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. Wendel,et al.  Trade-offs among anti-herbivore resistance traits: insights from Gossypieae (Malvaceae). , 2004, American journal of botany.

[19]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[20]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Meta‐analysis of Trade‐offs among Plant Antiherbivore Defenses: Are Plants Jacks‐of‐All‐Trades, Masters of All? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. Thomson,et al.  A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons , 2004 .

[22]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Specificity of induced plant responses to specialist herbivores of the common milkweed Asclepias syriaca , 2004 .

[23]  A. Agrawal,et al.  A Role for Isothiocyanates in Plant Resistance Against the Specialist Herbivore Pieris rapae , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[24]  J. Fordyce,et al.  Specialist Weevil, Rhyssomatus lineaticollis, Does Not Spatially Avoid Cardenolide Defenses of Common Milkweed by Ovipositing into Pith Tissue , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[25]  L. Twigg,et al.  Physical versus chemical defence mechanisms in toxic Gastrolobium , 1996, Oecologia.

[26]  M. Berenbaum,et al.  Chemical barriers to adaptation by a specialist herbivore , 1989, Oecologia.

[27]  M. Berenbaum,et al.  Adaptive significance of furanocoumarin diversity inPastinaca sativa (Apiaceae) , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[28]  L. S. Adler,et al.  Genetic variation in defensive chemistry in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae) , 2004, Oecologia.

[29]  H. Dingle,et al.  Competition: Butterflies eliminate milkweed bugs from a Caribbean Island , 2004, Oecologia.

[30]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Ecological play in the coevolutionary theatre: genetic and environmental determinants of attack by a specialist weevil on milkweed , 2003 .

[31]  POLLEN TRANSFER BY HUMMINGBIRDS AND BUMBLEBEES, AND THE DIVERGENCE OF POLLINATION MODES IN PENSTEMON , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  R. Brandl,et al.  Palatability, decomposition and insect herbivory: patterns in a successional old‐field plant community , 2003 .

[33]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[34]  AFLP PHYLOGENY OF MIMULUS SECTION ERYTHRANTHE AND THE EVOLUTION OF HUMMINGBIRD POLLINATION , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  M. Chase,et al.  Asclepiadeae classification: evaluating the phylogenetic relationships of New World Asclepiadoideae (Apocynaceae) , 2003 .

[36]  T. A. Kursara,et al.  Convergence in defense syndromes of young leaves in tropical rainforests , 2003 .

[37]  K. Linsenmair,et al.  Reduced chemical defence in ant‐plants? A critical re‐evaluation of a widely accepted hypothesis , 2002 .

[38]  A. Rambaut,et al.  TESTING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR RATES OF CHANGE ALONG PHYLOGENIES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Once upon a milkweed , 2002 .

[40]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[41]  M Fishbein,et al.  Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[42]  P. Lewis A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[43]  E. Martins,et al.  Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[44]  D. L. Venable,et al.  Interactions Between Chemical and Mechanical Defenses in the Plant Genus Bursera and Their Implications for Herbivores , 2001 .

[45]  G. Turner The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2001, Heredity.

[46]  M. Zalucki,et al.  Detrimental effects of latex and cardiac glycosides on survival and growth of first‐instar monarch butterfly larvae Danaus plexippus feeding on the sandhill milkweed Asclepias humistrata , 2001 .

[47]  M. Berenbaum Chemical mediation of coevolution: Phylogenetic evidence for Apiaceae and associates , 2001 .

[48]  A. Rodrigo,et al.  Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[49]  D. McKey,et al.  Low chitinase activity in Acacia myrmecophytes: a potential trade-off between biotic and chemical defences? , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[50]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Specificity of constitutive and induced resistance: pigment glands influence mites and caterpillars on cotton plants , 2000 .

[51]  N. Haddad,et al.  Host Pubescence and the Behavior and Performance of the Butterfly Papilio Troilus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) , 2000 .

[52]  J. Thomson,et al.  Pollen presentation and pollination syndromes, with special reference to Penstemon. , 2000 .

[53]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .

[54]  Mark Westoby,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCES IN LEAF STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY, COMPARING RAINFALL AND SOIL NUTRIENT GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[55]  D. L. Venable,et al.  Macroevolution of insect-plant associations: the relevance of host biogeography to host affiliation. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  D. Schemske,et al.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference , 1999, Molecular Biology and Evolution.

[58]  D. Schluter,et al.  Using Phylogenies to Test Macroevolutionary Hypotheses of Trait Evolution in Cranes (Gruinae) , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[59]  M. Pagel The Maximum Likelihood Approach to Reconstructing Ancestral Character States of Discrete Characters on Phylogenies , 1999 .

[60]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[61]  L. Stapley The interaction of thorns and symbiotic ants as an effective defence mechanism of swollen-thorn acacias , 1998, Oecologia.

[62]  Brian D. Farrell,et al.  The timing of insect/plant diversification: might Tetraopes (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) have co-evolved? , 1998 .

[63]  J. Daniel Hare,et al.  Differences in distribution and performance of two sap‐sucking herbivores on glandular and non‐glandular Datura wrightii , 1998 .

[64]  R. Karban,et al.  A Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Constitutive and Induced Resistance in Gossypium , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[65]  J. X. Becerra Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. , 1997, Science.

[66]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Comparing Plants and Connecting Traits , 1996 .

[67]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[68]  M. Stout,et al.  Antinutritive and toxic components of plant defense against insects , 1996 .

[69]  M. Fishbein Phylogenetic relationships of North American Asclepias L. and the role of pollinators in the evolution of the milkweed inflorescence , 1996 .

[70]  J. Saunders,et al.  Phytochemical Diversity and Redundancy in Ecological Interactions , 1996, Recent Advances in Phytochemistry.

[71]  R. Mithen,et al.  The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests , 1995 .

[72]  R. Bennett,et al.  Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[73]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Evolution of Suites of Traits in Response to Environmental Stress , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[74]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[75]  D. Herms,et al.  The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[76]  L. McDade Pollinator Relationships, Biogeography, and Phylogenetics , 1992 .

[77]  Brian D. Farrell,et al.  Escalation of Plant Defense: Do Latex and Resin Canals Spur Plant Diversification? , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[78]  G. Fernandes,et al.  Differential mechanical defense : herbivory, evapotranspiration, and leaf-hairs , 1991 .

[79]  S. Malcolm Chapter 7 – Cardenolide-Mediated Interactions between Plants and Herbivores , 1991 .

[80]  D. Simberloff The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1991 .

[81]  J. Steward,et al.  Are there trade-offs among antiherbivore defenses in Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae)? , 1988 .

[82]  E. Meijden,et al.  Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores , 1988 .

[83]  R. Stipanovic,et al.  Effects of Caryophyllene, Caryophyllene Oxide, and Their Interaction with Gossypol on the Growth and Development of Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1988 .

[84]  S. Duffey,et al.  The effect of plant protein quality on insect digestive physiology and the toxicity of plant proteinase inhibitors , 1988 .

[85]  D. Seigler,et al.  Cyanogenic Glycosides in Ant-Acacias of Mexico and Central America , 1987 .

[86]  T. Eisner,et al.  Vein-cutting behavior: insect counterploy to the latex defense of plants. , 1987, Science.

[87]  S. Caporn,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE, WATER AND NUTRIENT CONDITIONS DURING GROWTH ON THE RESPONSE OF BRASSICA OLERACEA L. TO A SINGLE, SHORT TREATMENT WITH SIMULATED ACID RAIN , 1987 .

[88]  M. Berenbaum,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON CHEMICAL COEVOLUTION: WILD PARSNIPS AND THE PARSNIP WEBWORM , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[89]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense , 1985, Science.

[90]  D. H. Morse Milkweeds and their Visitors , 1985 .

[91]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[92]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory , 1983 .

[93]  P. Coley,et al.  HERBIVORY AND DEFENSIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TREE SPECIES IN A LOWLAND TROPICAL FOREST , 1983 .

[94]  W. J. Mattson,et al.  Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content , 1980 .

[95]  P. Price,et al.  Abundance of Herbivores on Six Milkweed Species in Illinois , 1979 .

[96]  L. Pijl,et al.  POLLINATION ECOLOGY AND THE BIOCOENOSE , 1979 .

[97]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[98]  H. Wilbur Life history evolution in seven milkweeds of the genus Asclepias. , 1976 .

[99]  P. Feeny,et al.  Plant apparency and chemical defense , 1976 .

[100]  J. W. Wallace,et al.  Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects , 1976, Recent Advances in Phytochemistry.

[101]  D. Janzen Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae , 1974 .

[102]  D. Janzen,et al.  Chemical defence in Central American non-ant-Acacias , 1973 .

[103]  L. Brower,et al.  Variation in Cardiac Glycoside Content of Monarch Butterflies from Natural Populations in Eastern North America , 1972, Science.

[104]  C. M. Jones,et al.  Cucumber Beetle Resistance and Mite Susceptibility Controlled by the Bitter Gene in Cucumis sativus L , 1971, Science.

[105]  Ira Vaughan Hiscock,et al.  Genetics of the Evolutionary Process , 1971, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[106]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Cardiac glycosides in the oleander aphid, Aphis nerii. , 1970, Journal of insect physiology.

[107]  Knut Faegri,et al.  The principles of pollination ecology , 1967 .

[108]  L. Brower,et al.  Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain. , 1967, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[109]  R. B. Root The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher , 1967 .

[110]  P. Raven,et al.  BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION , 1964 .

[111]  R. E. Woodson The North American Species of Asclepias L , 1954 .

[112]  H. Weiss,et al.  The Insects of the Evening Primroses in New Jersey. , 1920 .