Griffon Vultures restrict movements around roosts and supplementary feeding stations, even when carrion is available on the field: a call for wind energy zonation to avoid ecological traps on Mediterranean islands

Wind energy is developing on Mediterranean islands, where endangered populations of Griffon Vulture ( Gyps fulvus ) occur. As griffons are subjected to collisions with wind turbines while foraging, it is necessary to understand which factors affect their movements, to minimize the potential impact of wind farms. We assessed habitat use by 37 griffons (n. GPS locations = 130,218) and its overlap with wind farms in Sardinia (Italy), an island where griffon vulture population is increasing thanks to concrete conservation actions and wind energy is significantly expanding. Griffons in Sardinia cover smaller areas (95% isopleth = 956.3 ± 677.7 km 2 , 50% isopleth = 73.8 ± 48.2 km 2 ) than in mainland Europe, restricting most of their movements within 5-10 km from colonies and roosts. Concentrated movements aligned with the fact that around roosts and colonies, approx. 20 tons of carrion (21% of estimated available carrion) are provided each year in supplementary feeding stations, while griffons still have enough cliffs to breed. Therefore, our results are highly suggestive that resource availability can constrain griffon movements on Mediterranean islands. Overall, 6 wind farms out of 29 were built in areas that were covered by moving griffons. Two of them were positioned right outside the areas the most used as foraging grounds, around roosts and supplementary feeding stations. As griffon movements

[1]  Ran Nathan,et al.  A lifetime track of a griffon vulture: The moving story of Rehovot (Y64). , 2023, Ecology.

[2]  C. Nielsen,et al.  Influence of natal habitat preference on habitat selection during extra‐home range movements in a large ungulate , 2023, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  M. Carrete,et al.  Large‐scale movement patterns in a social vulture are influenced by seasonality, sex, and breeding region , 2023, Ecology and evolution.

[4]  Ramalho,et al.  Clarifying space use concepts in ecology: range vs. occurrence distributions , 2022, bioRxiv.

[5]  Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al.  Mitigating GHG emissions: A global ecosystem service provided by obligate scavenging birds , 2022, Ecosystem Services.

[6]  A. Cortés-Avizanda,et al.  Vultures feeding on the dark side: current sanitary regulations may not be enough , 2022, Bird Conservation International.

[7]  V. Morandini,et al.  Significant decline of Griffon Vulture collision mortality in wind farms during 13-year of a selective turbine stopping protocol , 2022, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[8]  Elizabeth A. Masden,et al.  Hotspots in the grid: Avian sensitivity and vulnerability to collision risk from energy infrastructure interactions in Europe and North Africa , 2022, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[9]  Dana G. Schabo,et al.  Understanding continent-wide variation in vulture ranging behavior to assess feasibility of Vulture Safe Zones in Africa: Challenges and possibilities , 2022, Biological Conservation.

[10]  K. Bildstein.  Vultures of the World , 2022 .

[11]  M. Carrete,et al.  Apex scavengers from different European populations converge at threatened savannah landscapes , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[12]  M. Heurich,et al.  Human disturbance is the most limiting factor driving habitat selection of a large carnivore throughout Continental Europe , 2022, Biological Conservation.

[13]  Stoycho A. Stoychev,et al.  Seasonal and age-specific dynamics of the Griffon Vulture’s home range and movements in the Eastern Rhodopes , 2021, Ornis Hungarica.

[14]  K. Stara,et al.  Models of poisoning effects on vulture populations show that small but frequent episodes have a larger effect than large but rare ones , 2021, Web Ecology.

[15]  R. Tsiakiris,et al.  New insight into spatial ecology of Griffon Vulture (Gypsfulvus) on the Balkans provides opportunity for focusing conservation actions for a threatened social scavenger , 2021, Biodiversity data journal.

[16]  M. Pennino,et al.  Modelling the effect of environmental variables on the reproductive success of Griffon Vulture ( Gyps fulvus ) in Sardinia, Italy , 2021, Ibis.

[17]  Jesse M. Alston,et al.  Autocorrelation-informed home range estimation: a review and practical guide , 2021 .

[18]  F. Berlinguer,et al.  Help from the sky: Can vultures contribute to Cystic Echinococcosis control in endemic areas? , 2021, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[19]  G. Stoyanov,et al.  Re-introduction of Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) in the Eastern Balkan Mountains, Bulgaria – completion of the establishment phase 2010-2020 , 2021, Biodiversity data journal.

[20]  A. Sergiel,et al.  Avian scavengers living in anthropized landscapes have shorter telomeres and higher levels of glucocorticoid hormones , 2021 .

[21]  C. Grivas,et al.  Home range size, space use and resource selection of griffon vultures in an insular environment , 2021 .

[22]  Stoycho A. Stoychev,et al.  Seasonal dynamics in the exploitation of natural carcasses and supplementary feeding stations by a top avian scavenger , 2021, Journal of Ornithology.

[23]  Todd C Jacobsen,et al.  A novel method for detecting extra-home range movements (EHRMs) by animals and recommendations for future EHRM studies , 2020, PloS one.

[24]  Fadzai M. Zengeya,et al.  Multiple GPS fix intervals show variations in the manner African White-backed Vultures Gyps africanus utilise space , 2020 .

[25]  Travis L. Booms,et al.  Novel step selection analyses on energy landscapes reveal how linear features alter migrations of soaring birds. , 2020, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  J. Donázar,et al.  Integrating vulture social behavior into conservation practice , 2020, The Condor.

[27]  D. De Rosa,et al.  Assessing the effects of different management scenarios on the conservation of small island vulture populations , 2020, Bird Conservation International.

[28]  A. Cortés-Avizanda,et al.  Rewilding processes shape the use of Mediterranean landscapes by an avian top scavenger , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[29]  A. Cortés-Avizanda,et al.  Landscape anthropization shapes the survival of a top avian scavenger , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[30]  M. Franchini,et al.  Spatial ecology of non-breeding Eurasian Griffon Vultures Gyps fulvus in relation to natural and artificial food availability , 2020 .

[31]  Richard D. Young,et al.  Applying circuit theory and landscape linkage maps to reintroduction planning for California Condors , 2019, PloS one.

[32]  E. Shepard,et al.  Wind prevents cliff-breeding birds from accessing nests through loss of flight control , 2019, eLife.

[33]  J. González‐Oreja,et al.  Factors affecting population regulation of a colonial vulture , 2018, Ibis.

[34]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  A phylogenetically controlled meta‐analysis of biologging device effects on birds: Deleterious effects and a call for more standardized reporting of study data , 2017 .

[35]  S. Benhamou,et al.  Assessing the risk for an obligate scavenger to be dependent on predictable feeding sources , 2017 .

[36]  Siwei Liu,et al.  Person‐specific versus multilevel autoregressive models: Accuracy in parameter estimates at the population and individual levels , 2017, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[37]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Social foraging and individual consistency in following behaviour: testing the information centre hypothesis in free-ranging vultures , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  M. Virani,et al.  Supplementary feeding and endangered avian scavengers: benefits, caveats, and controversies , 2016 .

[39]  J. Donázar,et al.  Age-dependent survival of island vs. mainland populations of two avian scavengers: delving into migration costs , 2015, Oecologia.

[40]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  Mapping migratory flyways in Asia using dynamic Brownian bridge movement models , 2015, Movement ecology.

[41]  Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al.  Energy Landscapes Shape Animal Movement Ecology , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Mevin B Hooten,et al.  Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. , 2013, Ecology.

[43]  J. González‐Oreja,et al.  Foraging movements of Eurasian griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus): implications for supplementary feeding management , 2013, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[44]  Willem Bouten,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) How Predictability of Feeding Patches Affects Home Range and Foraging Habitat Selection in Avian Social Scavengers ? , 2012 .

[45]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[46]  G. Martin,et al.  Visual fields, foraging and collision vulnerability in Gyps vultures , 2012 .

[47]  O. Duriez,et al.  Intra-specific competition in foraging Griffon Vultures Gyps fulvus: 2. The influence of supplementary feeding management , 2012 .

[48]  P. López‐López,et al.  Ranging Behaviour of Non-Breeding Eurasian Griffon Vultures Gyps fulvus: A GPS-Telemetry Study , 2011 .

[49]  Christopher J. Farmer,et al.  Narrow sea crossings present major obstacles to migrating Griffon Vultures Gyps fulvus , 2009 .

[50]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  RELATING RESOURCES TO A PROBABILISTIC MEASURE OF SPACE USE: FOREST FRAGMENTS AND STELLER'S JAYS , 2004 .

[51]  P. Tiago,et al.  Food subsidies shape age structure in a top avian scavenger , 2022, Avian Conservation and Ecology.

[52]  S. Marinković,et al.  First description of movement and ranging behavior of the Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) from Serbia using GPS satellite tracking , 2021, Archives of Biological Sciences.

[53]  G. Martin,et al.  Visual fields, foraging and collision vulnerability in , 2012 .

[54]  M. Carrete,et al.  Mortality at wind-farms is positively related to large-scale distribution and aggregation in griffon vultures , 2012 .

[55]  J. Donázar,et al.  Population trends of the griffon vulture Gyps fulvus in Northern Spain between 1969 and 1989 in relation to conservation measures , 1990 .