Relative importance of fuel management, ignition management and weather for area burned: evidence from five landscape–fire–succession models

The behaviour of five landscape fire models (CAFE, FIRESCAPE, LAMOS(HS), LANDSUM and SEM- LAND) was compared in a standardised modelling experiment. The importance of fuel management approach, fuel management effort, ignition management effort and weather in determining variation in area burned and number of edge pixels burned (a measure of potential impact on assets adjacent to fire-prone landscapes) was quantified for a standardised modelling landscape. Importance was measured as the proportion of variation in area or edge pixels burned explained by each factor and all interactions among them. Weather and ignition management were consistently more important for explaining variation in area burned than fuel management approach and effort, which were found to be statistically unimportant. For the number of edge pixels burned, weather and ignition management were generally more important than fuel management approach and effort. Increased ignition management effort resulted in decreased area burned in all models and decreased number of edge pixels burned in three models. The findings demonstrate that year-to-year variation in weather and the success of ignition management consistently prevail over the effects of fuel management on area burned in a range of modelled ecosystems.

[1]  Steven G. Cumming,et al.  Effective fire suppression in boreal forests , 2005 .

[2]  Paulo M. Fernandes,et al.  A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction , 2003 .

[3]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Comparison of the Sensitivity of Landscape-fire-succession Models to Variation in Terrain, Fuel Pattern, Climate and Weather , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  R. Keane,et al.  Using simulation to map fire regimes: an evaluation of approaches, strategies, and limitations , 2003 .

[5]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations , 2006 .

[6]  M. Flannigan,et al.  Future Area Burned in Canada , 2005 .

[7]  P. J. Myerscough Flammable Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent , 2003 .

[8]  X. Lee,et al.  Introduction to wildland fire , 1997 .

[9]  Bushfire risk at the urban interface estimated from historical weather records: consequences for the use of prescribed fire in the Sydney region of south-eastern Australia , 1998 .

[10]  A. Gill,et al.  Flammable Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent , 2009 .

[11]  E. Johnson,et al.  The Relative Importance of Fuels and Weather on Fire Behavior in Subalpine Forests , 1995 .

[12]  T. Swetnam Fire History and Climate Change in Giant Sequoia Groves , 1993, Science.

[13]  Jeremy S. Fried,et al.  Wildland-urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington , 2007 .

[14]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Australia Burning: Fire Ecology, Policy and Management Issues , 2003 .

[15]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate , 2008 .

[16]  J. Keith Gilless,et al.  Predicting the effect of climate change on wildfire behavior and initial attack success , 2008 .

[17]  Ross A. Bradstock,et al.  Remote sensing of fire severity in the Blue Mountains: influence of vegetation type and inferring fire intensity , 2006 .

[18]  C. Li,et al.  Influence of potential climate change on forest landscape dynamics of west-central Alberta , 2000 .

[19]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  B. Wotton,et al.  ReplyA re-examination of the effects of fire suppression in the boreal forest , 2001 .

[21]  C. W. Richardson Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation , 1981 .

[22]  Richard A. Minnich,et al.  Wildland Fire Patch Dynamics in the Chaparral of Southern California and Northern Baja California , 1997 .

[23]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Fire in the Environment: The Ecological, Atmospheric and Climatic Importance of Vegetation Fires. , 1995 .

[24]  Keeley,et al.  Reexamining fire suppression impacts on brushland fire regimes , 1999, Science.

[25]  K. Miyanishi,et al.  CommentA re-examination of the effects of fire suppression in the boreal forest , 2001 .

[26]  Living with fire and biodiversity at the urban edge: in search of a sustainable solution to the human protection problem in southern Australia , 2001 .

[27]  Hong S. He,et al.  Fuel load reductions and fire risk in central hardwood forests of the united states: a spatial simulation study , 2004 .

[28]  Chao Li,et al.  Reconstruction of natural fire regimes through ecological modelling , 2000 .

[29]  R. Bradstock,et al.  Spatially-explicit simulation of the effect of prescribed burning on fire regimes and plant extinctions in shrublands typical of south-eastern Australia , 1998 .

[30]  Johann G. Goldammer,et al.  Fire in the Environment: The Ecological, Atmospheric, and Climatic Importance of Vegetation Fires , 1994 .

[31]  A. Gill,et al.  Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals , 2005 .

[32]  Keith Beven,et al.  Modelling the effect of fire-exclusion and prescribed fire on wildfire size in Mediterranean ecosystems , 2005 .

[33]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics , 2004 .

[34]  R. Keane,et al.  Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach , 2002 .

[35]  Ross A. Bradstock,et al.  Simulation of prescribed burning strategies in south-west Tasmania, Australia: effects on unplanned fires, fire regimes, and ecological management values , 2006 .

[36]  G. Cary Importance of a changing climate for fire regimes in Australia. , 2002 .

[37]  A. Lugo,et al.  Climate Change and Forest Disturbances , 2001 .

[38]  Lisa M. Holsinger,et al.  Simulating historical landscape dynamics using the landscape fire succession model LANDSUM version 4.0 , 2006 .

[39]  M. Finney Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[40]  R. Bradstock,et al.  The modelled effects of differing fire management strategies on the conifer Callitris verrucosa within semi‐arid mallee vegetation in Australia , 2006 .

[41]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Sensitivity of fire regimes to management , 2003 .

[42]  M. Sykes,et al.  A comparison of forest gap models: Model structure and behaviour , 1996 .

[43]  Mike D. Flannigan,et al.  Climate, Weather, and Area Burned , 2001 .

[44]  Geoffrey J. Cary,et al.  Fire Regime Sensitivity to Global Climate Change: An Australian Perspective , 2000 .

[45]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  G. Cary Research priorities arising from the 2002–2003 bushfire season in south-eastern Australia , 2005 .

[47]  Yves Bergeron,et al.  Role of vegetation and weather on fire behavior in the Canadian mixedwood boreal forest using two fire behavior prediction systems. , 2001 .