Numerical investigation of irrigation scheduling based on soil water status

Improving the sustainability of irrigation systems requires the optimization of operational parameters such as irrigation threshold and irrigation amount. Numerical modeling is a fast and accurate means to optimize such operational parameters. However, little work has been carried out to investigate the relationship between irrigation scheduling, irrigation threshold, and irrigation amount. Herein, we compare the results of HYDRUS 2D/3D simulations with experimental data from triggered drip irrigation, and optimize operational parameters. Two field experiments were conducted, one on loamy sand soil and one on sandy loam soil, to evaluate the overall effects of different potential transpiration rates and irrigation management strategies, on the triggered irrigation system. In both experiments, irrigation was controlled by a closed loop irrigation system linked to tensiometers. Collected experimental data were analyzed and compared with HYDRUS 2D/3D simulations. A system-dependant boundary condition, which initiates irrigation whenever the matric head at a predetermined location drops below a certain threshold, was implemented into the code. The experimental model was used to evaluate collected experimental data, and then to optimize the operational parameters for two hypothetical soils. The results show that HYDRUS 2D/3D predictions of irrigation events and matric heads are in good agreement with experimental data, and that the code can be used to optimize irrigation thresholds and water amounts applied in an irrigation episode to increase the efficiency of water use.

[1]  Naftali Lazarovitch,et al.  Water distribution under trickle irrigation predicted using artificial neural networks , 2009 .

[2]  Uri Shani,et al.  Optimal dynamic irrigation schemes , 2004 .

[3]  Sterling A. Taylor,et al.  Managing Irrigation Water on the Farm , 1965 .

[4]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  A. A. Siyal,et al.  Performance of Pitcher Irrigation System , 2009 .

[6]  B. Zur.  THE PULSED IRRIGATION PRINCIPLE FOR CONTROLLED SOIL WETTING , 1976 .

[7]  T. A. Howell,et al.  Soil Sensor Control of High-Frequency Irrigation Systems , 1984 .

[8]  E. Segal,et al.  Root Water Uptake Efficiency Under Ultra-High Irrigation Frequency , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[9]  Thomas L. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen and water interactions in subsurface drip-irrigated cauliflower: I. Plant response. , 2000 .

[10]  U. Shani,et al.  Modeling Plant Response to Drought and Salt Stress: Reformulation of the Root‐Sink Term , 2003 .

[11]  Thomas J. Trout,et al.  Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations , 2004 .

[12]  Edward A. Hiler,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Automated Subsurface Irrigation Systems , 1973 .

[13]  Kalle Hoppula,et al.  Tensiometer-based irrigation scheduling in perennial strawberry cultivation , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[14]  Dani Or,et al.  Flow and uptake patterns affecting soil water sensor placement for drip irrigation management , 1996 .

[15]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[16]  J. Šimůnek,et al.  Uniqueness of Soil Hydraulic Parameters Determined by a Combined Wooding Inverse Approach , 2007 .

[17]  Y. Mualem.  A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[18]  N. Lazarovitch,et al.  An artificial capillary barrier to improve root zone conditions for horticultural crops: physical effects on water content , 2010, Irrigation Science.

[19]  Miroslav Šejna,et al.  Development and Applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes , 2008 .

[20]  C. R. Camp,et al.  Evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling , 1996 .

[21]  J. P. Bell,et al.  The control of drip irrigation of sugarcane using “index” tensiometers: Some comparisons with control by the water budget method , 1990 .

[22]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[23]  Fengxin Wang,et al.  Potato evapotranspiration and yield under different drip irrigation regimes , 2004, Irrigation Science.

[24]  Robert A. Young,et al.  Impact of irrigation timing on simulated water-crop production functions , 1997, Irrigation Science.

[25]  Uri Shani,et al.  Field Studies of Crop Response to Water and Salt Stress , 2001 .

[26]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[27]  Naftali Lazarovitch,et al.  System‐Dependent Boundary Condition for Water Flow from Subsurface Source , 2005 .

[28]  L. Dudley,et al.  Modeling Plant Response to Drought and Salt Stress: Reformulation of the Root‐Sink Term , 2003 .

[29]  Gerard Arbat,et al.  Monitoring soil water status for micro-irrigation management versus modelling approach , 2008 .