Success factors of energy efficiency measures in buildings in Norway

Abstract The aim of the study was to identify factors and parameters, which could contribute to the successful implementation of energy efficiency measures in buildings, and to find which parameters introduce uncertainties in achieving the planned energy savings. A database of 41 buildings was developed for the analysis. The database contained information related to buildings, energy efficiency measures, and energy use over several years. A presentation method for the persistence of the energy efficiency measures was introduced. Through the energy performance contract, energy savings of 30% of the total energy use were suggested on average. The results showed that the success factors of the energy efficiency measures were: previous energy use, project cost, consultant experience and engagement, and implementation of a good operation plan. The persistence of the energy efficiency measures was influenced by the achieved savings in the first year, the guaranty period, and the implementation of the operation measures. Uncertainties in the presented results were induced by the following factors: temperature correction method, difference in reported building area, correctness of the information regarding the implemented measures, and calculation method. The uncertainty due to lack of information or not delivering the operation measures was about 20% of the total energy use.

[1]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[2]  A. Zöld-Zs. Szalay.  What is missing from the concept of the new European Building Directive , 2007 .

[3]  Stig-Inge Gustafsson,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of building energy retrofits , 1998 .

[4]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium , 2007 .

[5]  Edwin H.W. Chan,et al.  Success factors of energy performance contracting (EPC) for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) of hotel buildings in China , 2011 .

[6]  Ping Jiang,et al.  Overcoming barriers to implementation of carbon reduction strategies in large commercial buildings in China , 2010 .

[7]  Danny S. Parker,et al.  Very low energy homes in the United States: Perspectives on performance from measured data , 2009 .

[8]  Uta Hassler,et al.  Alternative scenarios for energy conservation in the building stock , 2012 .

[9]  Eric Hirst,et al.  Actual energy savings after retrofit: Electrically heated homes in the Pacific Northwest , 1986 .

[10]  Ruchi Choudhary,et al.  Optimum building energy retrofits under technical and economic uncertainty , 2013 .

[11]  Gautam S. Dutt,et al.  Building energy use compilation and analysis (BECA). Part B: Retrofit of existing North American residential buildings , 1983 .

[12]  Bruce Nordman,et al.  Findings from a low-energy, new commercial-buildings research and demonstration project , 1995 .

[13]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but ... , 2009 .

[14]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art , 2012 .

[15]  Wei Bai,et al.  Sustainability assessment of renovation packages for increased energy efficiency for multi-family buildings in Sweden , 2013 .

[16]  C. A. Goldman.  Measured energy savings from residential retrofits: Updated results from the BECA-B project☆ , 1985 .

[17]  Hugo Hens.  Energy efficient retrofit of an end of the row house: Confronting predictions with long-term measurements , 2010 .

[18]  Vojislav Novakovic,et al.  Correlation between standards and the lifetime commissioning , 2010 .

[19]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .