SCAPULAR SHAPE AND PRIMATE CLASSIFICATION

Certain quantitative features of the primato scapula bear no obvious mechanical relevance to such functions of the bone as are known to be significant in the employment of the forelimb during progression. Statistically these “residual” features are but weakly correlated with those of established locomotor significance and do not show a correspondingly regular pattern of contrast between Primates in different locomotor categories. These features would, therefore, appear not to be adapted to locomotor function. Consequently, unless they have other functional significance or are linked genetically with other adaptive characters, their parallel variation may indicate genetic relationship. Thus, residual metrical features of this type may be of significance in primate classification. This is in contrast to features of proved locomotor significance whose concurrent appearance in several groups probably represents the result of parallel selection acting in unrelated species. Eight such features examined in thirty genera (covoring most of the primate order) differentiate significantly between genera within subfamilies and somewhat fewer features differentiate between the components of progressively higher taxonomic groups. But the degree of overlap between genera is such as to minimize the value of individual dimensions in classifying an unknown specimen. It would, however, seem likely that the combination of these dimensions by multivariate techniques might effect a more efficient separation of forms within the primate order.

[1]  A. Hrdlička The scapula: Visual observations , 1942 .

[2]  C. R. Stockard,et al.  The genetic and endocrinic basis for differences in form and behavior : as elucidated by studies of contrasted pure-line dog breeds and their hybrids , 1943 .

[3]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals. , 1945 .

[4]  S. G. Mivart On the appendicular skeleton of the primates , 1867, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[5]  A. Hrdlička The adult scapula. Additional observations and measurements , 1942 .

[6]  E. H. Ashton,et al.  The descriptive use of discriminant functions in physical anthropology , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[7]  Charles Oxnard,et al.  LOCOMOTOR PATTERNS IN PRIMATES , 2009 .

[8]  E. H. Ashton,et al.  Functional adaptations in the primate shoulder girdle , 2009 .

[9]  J. Saunders,et al.  Observations of the Function of the Shoulder Joint , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  H. Vallois L'omoplate humaine. Etude anatomique et anthropologique (Troisième partie). , 1946 .

[11]  E. H. Ashton,et al.  The musculature of the primate shoulder , 2010 .

[12]  D. J. Gray Variations in human scapulae , 1942 .

[13]  D. Wolffson Scapula shape and muscle function, with special reference to the vertebral border. , 1950, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  H. Vallois L'omoplate humaine, étude anatomique et anthropologique , 1928 .