Developing a step-by-step effectiveness assessment model for customer-oriented service organizations

Effectiveness involves more than simple efficiency, which is limited to the production process assessment of peer operational units. Effectiveness incorporates both endogenous and exogenous variables. It is a fundamental driver for the success of an operational unit within a competitive environment in which either the liquidity of money in the market and the customers are considered to be scarce sources, or the New Public Management (NPM) is citizen/customer and goal-oriented. Additionally, with respect to short-run production constraints, the resources available and controllable by the operational units, as well as the legal status, we go beyond the traditional effectiveness assessment techniques by developing a modified or “rational” Quality-driven – Efficiency-adjusted DEA (MQE-DEA) model. This particular model provides a feasible effectiveness attainment path for every disqualified unit in order to meet high-perceived quality and high-efficiency standards. The input-output mix restructuring targets estimated by the original QE-DEA model are provided on a step-by-step basis in order to have realistic managerial implications.

[1]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[2]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Annals of Operations Research , 1996 .

[3]  A. Athanassopoulos.  Service quality and operating efficiency synergies for management control in the provision of financial services: Evidence from Greek bank branches , 1997 .

[4]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[5]  Daniel Santín,et al.  How to generate regularly behaved production data? A Monte Carlo experimentation on DEA scale efficiency measurement , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  Managing Performance in the Public Sector , 2002 .

[7]  M. Sharpe,et al.  MEASURING EFFICIENCY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ’ PLANNING AND REGULATORY FUNCTION , 2005 .

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: Evidence from a U.S.bank application , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems , 1997 .

[10]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice , 1993 .

[11]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[12]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance: Modeling Considerations and Approaches , 2004 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[16]  L. Seiford,et al.  Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .

[17]  Andrew C. Worthington,et al.  Measuring efficiency in local governemnts’ planning and regulatory function , 2000 .

[18]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[19]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A Customer Satisfaction Research Prospectus , 1994 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos,et al.  Applying quality-driven, efficiency-adjusted DEA (QE-DEA) in the pursuit of high-efficiency–high-quality service units: an input-oriented approach , 2011 .