Properties of the stainless steel substrate, influencing the adhesion of thermo-resistant streptococci

Abstract The quality of products produced by dairy manufacturing plant is threatened when bacteria attached to and growing (biofilm formation) on stainless steel are released into the product stream. The adhesion of bacteria to the surface is the first stage in this process and enables subsequent proliferation and release. In the present trial, thermo-resistant streptococci were found to adhere preferentially to stainless steel and zinc substrates compared with other metal and glass substrates and more bacteria adhered to 316L than to 304L grade stainless steel. The adhesion of thermo-resistant streptococci to samples of 304 stainless steel with a range of surface roughness values ( R a 0.5–3.3 μm) or with typical flaws was found to be largely independent of the substrate topography although bacterial entrapment may occur at 0.9 μm.. The rate of adhesion of thermo-resistant streptococci was enhanced in the presence of a hydrophilic substrate, negative electrostatic forces and/or the presence of an oxide coat.

[1]  U. Rönner,et al.  Forces involved in adhesion of Bacillus cereus spores to solid surfaces under different environmental conditions. , 1990, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[2]  G. Siragusa,et al.  Cell surface charge and initial attachment characteristics of rough strains of Listeria monocytogenes , 1994 .

[3]  W. K. Jordan,et al.  Studies on the Relative Bacterial Cleanability of Milk-Contact Surfaces , 1958 .

[4]  Mel Rosenberg,et al.  Hydrophobic interactions: role in bacterial adhesion , 1986 .

[5]  L. Boulané-Petermann.  Processes of bioadhesion on stainless steel surfaces and cleanability: A review with special reference to the food industry. , 1996, Biofouling.

[6]  R. R. Maller,et al.  Passivation of stainless steel , 1998 .

[7]  H. Busscher,et al.  Deposition of leuconostoc mesenteroides and streptococcus thermophilus to solid substrata in a parallel plate flow cell , 1990 .

[8]  M. Bellon-Fontaine,et al.  Adhesion of streptococcus thermophilus to stainless steel with different surface topography and roughness , 1997 .

[9]  L. Ward,et al.  Streptococcus waius sp. nov., a thermophilic Streptococcus from a biofilm. , 1999, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[10]  M. Lalande,et al.  Cleanability in relation to surface chemical composition and surface finishing of some materials commonly used in food industries , 1994 .

[11]  L. Poulsen,et al.  Substratum-induced morphological changes in a marine bacterium and their relevance to biofilm structure , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  P. Bremer,et al.  Use of the Malthus conductance growth analyser to determine numbers of thermophilic streptococci on stainless steel , 1997, Journal of applied microbiology.

[13]  J. Remon,et al.  Kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion to 304 and 316-L stainless steel: role of cell surface hydrophobicity , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  P. Bremer,et al.  The influence of cell surface properties of thermophilic streptococci on attachment to stainlesssteel , 1997, Journal of applied microbiology.

[15]  D. Roy,et al.  Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to Stainless Steel, Glass, Polypropylene, and Rubber Surfaces After Short Contact Times. , 1990, Journal of food protection.

[16]  Karsten Pedersen,et al.  Biofilm development on stainless steel and PVC surfaces in drinking water , 1990 .

[17]  P. Bremer,et al.  The influence of welding procedures on bacterial colonization of stainless steel weldments , 1999 .

[18]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.