“What’s the Robo-Driver up to?” Requirements for Screen-based Awareness and Intent Communication in Autonomous Buses

Abstract Autonomous buses are expected to become a cornerstone of future mobility systems. Especially during their introduction, passengers may require reassurance about the vehicle’s awareness of the situation on the road and of its intended next actions to further acceptance. In order to investigate the need and requirements for information about the vehicle’s awareness and intent from the perspective of first-time users, we conducted two user studies in a state-of-the-art autonomous bus at public demonstration spaces. In the first study, participants underwent a demonstration ride with the bus and were then asked about their needs for awareness and intent communication. The second study took participants on a ‘simulated ride’ within a stationary bus, in which typical scenarios of the road ahead were presented, together with different awareness and intent cues. Our results suggest that, first, future autonomous bus passengers may be in need of such awareness and intent communication screens. Second, we found that awareness and intent communication may be of greater importance for the indication of potential hazard recognition than for indicating route directions. Third, due to their complementary strengths, none of the three compared types of visual communication (text, icon and augmented reality) should be used in isolation.

[1]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[2]  John D. Lee,et al.  Modeling Driver Response to Imperfect Vehicle Control Automation , 2015 .

[3]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Towards a Personalized Trust Model for Highly Automated Driving , 2016, Mensch & Computer Workshopband.

[4]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Supporting Trust in Autonomous Driving , 2017 .

[5]  Tove Helldin,et al.  Transparency for future semi-automated systems: effects of transparency on operator performance, workload and trust , 2014 .

[6]  Florian Evéquoz,et al.  On the Road with an Autonomous Passenger Shuttle: Integration in Public Spaces , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Autonomous Driving - The Impact of Vehicle Automation on Mobility Behaviour , 2016 .

[8]  William Payre,et al.  What impressions do users have after a ride in an automated shuttle? An interview study , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[9]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust , 2007 .

[10]  Karl Rehrl,et al.  Digibus©: results from the first self-driving shuttle trial on a public road in Austria , 2018, European Transport Research Review.

[11]  Andrii Matviienko,et al.  Deriving design guidelines for ambient light systems , 2015, MUM.

[12]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[13]  Pontus Larsson Tools for Designing Emotional Auditory Driver-Vehicle Interfaces , 2009, CMMR/ICAD.

[14]  Paul Bossauer,et al.  User Acceptance of Fully Autonomous Public Transport , 2017, ICE-B.

[15]  Philipp Wintersberger,et al.  Man vs. Machine: Comparing a Fully Automated Bus Shuttle with a Manually Driven Group Taxi in a Field Study , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[16]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Marco Pavone,et al.  Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems for Future Urban Mobility , 2016 .

[18]  Yong Gu Ji,et al.  Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Verena Distler,et al.  Acceptability and Acceptance of Autonomous Mobility on Demand: The Impact of an Immersive Experience , 2018, CHI.

[20]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.

[21]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[22]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  Travel in Britain in 2035: future scenarios and their implications for technology innovation , 2016 .

[23]  Moritz Körber,et al.  Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  J. D. Winter,et al.  Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles: Results from a Large Cross-National Questionnaire Study , 2018 .