Impact of MRI resolution for Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery

Objective Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard imaging modality in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for defining target volumes. However, wide disparities in MRI resolution exist, which could directly impact accuracy of target delineation. Here, sequences with various MRI resolution were acquired on phantoms to evaluate the effect on volume definition and dosimetric consequence for cranial SRS. Materials/Methods Four T1-weighted MR sequences with increasing 3D resolution were compared, including two Spin Echo (SE) 2D acquisitions with 5mm and 3mm slice thickness (SE5mm, SE3mm) and two gradient echo 3D acquisitions (TFE, BRAVO). The voxel sizes were 0.4×0.4×5.0, 0.5×0.5×3.0, 0.9×0.9×1.25, and 0.4×0.4×0.5 mm3, respectively. Four phantoms with simulated lesions of different shape and volume (range, 0.53–25.0 cm3) were imaged, resulting in 16 total sets of MRIs. Four radiation oncologists provided contours on individual MR image set. All observer contours were compared with ground truth, defined on CT image according to the absolute dimensions of the target structure, using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean distance-to-agreement (MDA), and the ratio between reconstructed and true volume (Ratiovol ). For dosimetric consequence, SRS plans targeting observer volumes were created. The true Paddick conformity index ( C I p a d d i c k t r u e ), calculated with true target volume, was correlated with quality of observer volume. Results All measures of observer contours improved as increasingly higher MRI resolution was provided from SE5mm to BRAVO. The improvement in DSC, HD and MDA was statistically significant (p<0.01). Dosimetrically, C I p a d d i c k t r u e strongly correlated with DSC of the planning observer volume (Pearson’s r=0.94, p<0.00001). Conclusions Significant improvement in target definition and reduced inter-observer variation was observed as the MRI resolution improved, which also improved the quality of SRS plans. Results imply that high resolution 3D MR sequences should be used to minimize potential errors in target definition, and multi-slice 2D sequences should be avoided.

[1]  E. Yorke,et al.  Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain. , 2020, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J. Debus,et al.  Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery , 2020, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[3]  Manuel A. Schmidt,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for brain stereotactic radiotherapy , 2020, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[4]  Raymond Y Huang,et al.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases (BTIP-BM). , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[5]  D. Kondziolka Current and novel practice of stereotactic radiosurgery , 2019 .

[6]  J. Knisely,et al.  Tumor control and survival in patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective analysis , 2019, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[7]  J. Bourland,et al.  Does Stereotactic Radiosurgery Have a Role in the Management of Patients Presenting With 4 or More Brain Metastases? , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[8]  Sofia Nahavandi,et al.  Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery following excision of brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[9]  D. Eaton,et al.  Inter-Observer Variability in Target Volume Delineations of Benign and Metastatic Brain Tumours for Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Results of a National Quality Assurance Programme. , 2019, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[10]  J. Régis,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  Oliver Blanck,et al.  ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams , 2019, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[12]  H. Jokura,et al.  Multi-institutional study of the variability in target delineation for six targets commonly treated with radiosurgery , 2018, Acta oncologica.

[13]  S. Ohira,et al.  HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach , 2018, Radiation oncology.

[14]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[15]  I. Gibbs,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma. , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[16]  J. Buckner,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery With or Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Limited Brain Metastases: A Secondary Analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0574 (Alliance) Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  David J. Eaton,et al.  Dependence of volume calculation and margin growth accuracy on treatment planning systems for stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  J. Flickinger,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for essential tremor: Retrospective analysis of a 19‐year experience , 2017, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[19]  Eric S Paulson,et al.  Consensus opinion on MRI simulation for external beam radiation treatment planning. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Volker W Stieber,et al.  Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[21]  Satoshi Suzuki,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  Peter Dunscombe,et al.  The effect of contouring variability on dosimetric parameters for brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Lijun Ma,et al.  Reliability of contour-based volume calculation for radiosurgery. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[25]  Y. Shibamoto,et al.  Increases in the number of brain metastases detected at frame-fixed, thin-slice MRI for gamma knife surgery planning. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[26]  M. Schell,et al.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. , 2010, Medical physics.

[27]  J. Perks,et al.  Clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging on Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  J. Snell,et al.  Assessment of imaging studies used with radiosurgery: a volumetric algorithm and an estimation of its error. Technical note. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  M. F. Parry,et al.  A Retrospective Analysis , 1990 .

[31]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[32]  E. Glaser The randomized clinical trial. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .