Understanding the effects of outsourcing: unpacking the total factor productivity variable

Research on why firms should outsource and how they should do it has proliferated in the past two decades, but few consistent findings have emerged concerning the benefits of outsourcing. We argue that this is in part due to the lack of an adequate framework for measuring the effects of outsourcing. To address this, we present such a framework based upon the Cobb–Douglas productivity function. We explain how our framework can be used to unpack one component of the Cobb–Douglas productivity function, the ‘total factor productivity’, which represents the other numerous sub-variables that affect outsourcing productivity, beyond the capital and labour expenditures. We also demonstrate the framework using a simple illustrative example.

[1]  D. Siegel,et al.  Outsourcing and productivity growth in services , 1999 .

[2]  Eric Strobl,et al.  Productivity Effects of International Outsourcing: Evidence from Plant-Level Data , 2007 .

[3]  D. Durand.  Some Thoughts on Marginal Productivity, with Special Reference to Professor Douglas' Analysis , 1937, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Ian Paul McCarthy,et al.  The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and boundaries of manufacturing , 2004 .

[5]  William Barnett,et al.  Dimensions and economics: Some problems , 2003 .

[6]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Research on outsourcing results: current literature and future opportunities , 2006 .

[7]  S. B. Taps,et al.  Aligning supply chain design with manufacturing strategies in developing regions , 2007 .

[8]  Holger Görg,et al.  Outsourcing, Foreign Ownership, and Productivity: Evidence from UK Establishment-Level Data , 2004 .

[9]  Daniel Horgos,et al.  Labor Market Effects of International Outsourcing: How Measurement Matters , 2007 .

[10]  P. S. Labini.  Why the interpretation of the Cobb-Douglas production function must be radically changed , 1995 .

[11]  Frances J. Milliken.  Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[12]  Gerrit Sarens,et al.  Sourcing strategy of Belgian SMEs: empirical evidence for the accounting services , 2007 .

[13]  Brian R. Gordon,et al.  A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Environmental Velocity , 2010 .

[14]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Making More by Doing Less: An Analysis of Outsourcing and its Effects on Firm Performance , 2000 .

[15]  Edward N. Wolff,et al.  Outsourcing of Services and the Productivity Recovery in U.S. Manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s , 2001 .

[16]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[17]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art , 1997 .

[18]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[19]  Aroop K. Mahanty,et al.  THEORY OF PRODUCTION , 1980 .

[20]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates For the United States, 1979–1990 , 1999 .

[21]  David W. Zeitler.  Introduction to Quality Control , 1994 .

[22]  D. Probert,et al.  Make vs. buy decisions: a process incorporating multi-attribute decision-making , 2002 .

[23]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Restructuring and Outsourcing: The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions and LBOs on Building Firm Skills and Capabilities , 1995 .

[24]  Lars Bengtsson,et al.  Invest or divest? On the relative improvement potential in outsourcing manufacturing , 2008 .

[25]  Karsten Olsen.  Productivity Impacts of Offshoring and Outsourcing: A Review , 2006 .

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[27]  Aidan R. Vining,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding the outsourcing decision , 1999 .