Application of life cycle assessment approach to deliver low carbon houses at regional level in Western Australia

PurposeAustralian building sector contributes 23% of the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This is particularly important for Western Australia (WA) as the houses here are made of energy- and carbon-intensive clay bricks. This research has utilized life cycle assessment (LCA) approach and cleaner production strategies (CPS) to design low-carbon houses in 18 locations in regional WA.MethodsAn integrative LCA analysis of clay brick house has been conducted by incorporating energy efficiency rating tool (i.e., AccuRate) to capture the regional variation in thermal performance of houses in 18 locations in WA under five climatic zones. The data bank provided information on energy and materials for mining to material production, transportation of construction materials to the site of construction, and construction stages, while an energy rating tool has been utilized to generate location-specific information on energy consumption during use stage for developing a life cycle inventory for estimating life cycle GHG emissions and embodied energy consumption of a typical 4 × 2 × 2 detached house (i.e., 4 bed rooms, 2 bathrooms, and 2 cars/double garage). This approach has enabled us to determine the location-specific hotspot of a house in order to select suitable CPS for achieving reduced level of GHG emissions and embodied energy consumption.Results and discussionExcept for two hottest locations, the average life cycle GHG emissions and embodied energy consumption of houses at 16 locations in regional WA have been estimated to be 469 t of CO2 equivalent (or CO2 e-) and 6.9 TJ, respectively. Home appliances and water heating have been found to be the top two hotspots. The CPS options, including rooftop solar photovoltaic panels (PV), solar water heaters (SWH) integrated with gas based water heaters, cast in situ concrete sandwich wall, fly ash as a partial replacement of cement in concrete, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) foam made of post-consumed polyethylene terephthalate bottles, have been considered to reduce GHG emissions and embodied energy consumption of a typical house in18 locations in regional WA. Excluding above two hottest locations, these CPS provide an opportunity to reduce GHG emissions and embodied energy consumption per house by an average value of 320 t CO2 e- and 3.7 TJ, respectively.ConclusionsConsidering the alarming growth rate of the housing industry in WA, the incorporation of optimum house orientation, rooftop solar PV, roof top SWH, cast in situ sandwich wall, partial replacement of cement in concrete with fly ash, and PET foam insulation core could reduce the overall GHG emissions and embodied energy consumption associated with the construction and use of clay brick wall house which in turn will assist in achieving Australia’s GHG emission reduction target by 2050. The findings provide useful data for architects, designers, developers, and policy makers to choose from these CPS options based on existing resource availability and cost constraints.

[1]  Joel Ann Todd,et al.  Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment : A Final Report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup , 1999 .

[2]  Garrette Clark,et al.  Evolution of the global sustainable consumption and production policy and the United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) supporting activities , 2007 .

[3]  Abhijit Date,et al.  Energy efficient residential house wall system , 2013 .

[4]  Liza O'moore,et al.  Impact of fly ash content and fly ash transportation distance on embodied greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption in concrete , 2009 .

[5]  Mustafa Mashal,et al.  Quantification Of Seismic Performance Factors for Buildings Incorporating Three-Dimensional Construction System , 2011 .

[7]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on the thermal performance of various Australian residential constructions systems , 2008 .

[8]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implications of wall assemblages designs , 2014 .

[9]  S. Ahmed,et al.  Properties of Concrete Containing Recycled Fine Aggregate and Fly Ash , 2014 .

[10]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (5th Edition) , 1984 .

[11]  Dora Foti,et al.  Preliminary analysis of concrete reinforced with waste bottles PET fibers , 2011 .

[12]  Robert F. Boehm,et al.  Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components , 2011 .

[13]  Hatice Sözer,et al.  Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope , 2010 .

[14]  Residential House Energy Rating in Australia , 2009 .

[15]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Assessment of climate change impact on residential building heating and cooling energy requirement in Australia , 2010 .

[16]  Rene van Berkel,et al.  Cleaner production and eco-efficiency initiatives in Western Australia 1996–2004 , 2007 .

[17]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[18]  Zhengen Ren,et al.  Enhanced air flow modelling for AccuRate – A nationwide house energy rating tool in Australia , 2010 .

[19]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[20]  Chi-ming Lai,et al.  Energy-Saving Potential of Building Envelope Designs in Residential Houses in Taiwan , 2011 .

[21]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[22]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Affordable, safe housing based on expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam and a cementitious coating , 2006 .

[23]  Mohammad Zaman Kabir,et al.  Shaking Table Test of a 1:2.35 Scale 4-Story Building Constructed with a 3D Panel System , 2009 .

[24]  Mohammad Zaman Kabir,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of 3D-panel single-storey system using shaking table testing , 2008 .

[25]  Suwin Sandu,et al.  Australian Energy Resource Assessment , 2010 .

[26]  Tomaso Trombetti,et al.  Results of pseudo-static tests with cyclic horizontal load on cast in situ sandwich squat concrete walls , 2013 .

[27]  A. Whyte,et al.  Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of roof-covering materials , 2018, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[28]  Nasim Uddin,et al.  Structural behavior and modeling of full-scale composite structural insulated wall panels , 2012 .

[29]  R. Siddique,et al.  Use of recycled plastic in concrete: a review. , 2008, Waste management.

[30]  Ming-Lung Hung,et al.  Quantifying system uncertainty of life cycle assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[31]  Lisa Guan,et al.  Implication of global warming on air-conditioned office buildings in Australia , 2009 .

[32]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction , 1994 .

[33]  Perry Forsythe,et al.  Assessing brick waste on domestic construction sites for future avoidance , 2007 .

[34]  Enda Crossin,et al.  Waste avoidance and reuse strategies for residential buildings in Australia , 2014 .

[35]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: A review , 2013, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[36]  Firas Awaja,et al.  Recycling of PET , 2005 .

[37]  Stefano Silvestri,et al.  DESIGN OF A SHAKING TABLE TEST ON A 3-STOREY BUILDING COMPOSED OF CAST-IN-SITU CONCRETE WALLS , 2012 .

[38]  J. Månson,et al.  Recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) into closed‐cell foams , 2000 .

[39]  Trivess Moore,et al.  Size matters:house size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments , 2012 .

[40]  Firoz Alam,et al.  Effect of Climates and Building Materials on House Wall Thermal Performance , 2013 .

[41]  Laura Ragni,et al.  Experimental tests and numerical modelling of wall sandwich panels , 2012 .

[42]  J. C. Lam,et al.  Impact of climate change on residential building envelope cooling loads in subtropical climates , 2010 .

[43]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Effect of Fly Ash on the Durability Properties of High Strength Concrete , 2011 .

[44]  F. Intini,et al.  Recycling in buildings: an LCA case study of a thermal insulation panel made of polyester fiber, recycled from post-consumer PET bottles , 2011 .

[45]  Abhijit Date,et al.  In Press) A new house wall system for residential buildings , 2013 .

[46]  L. Nilson,et al.  Cleaner Production : Technologies and Tools for Resource Efficient Production , 2007 .

[47]  Chi-Hsiang Wang,et al.  Cooling energy consumption and reduction effect for residential buildings in South East Queensland, Australia , 2013 .

[48]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Impact of climate change on energy use in the built environment in different climate zones – A review , 2012 .

[49]  Xu Xu,et al.  Evaluation of an Active Building Envelope window-system , 2008 .

[50]  Wahidul K. Biswas,et al.  Carbon footprint and embodied energy consumption assessment of building construction works in Western Australia , 2014 .

[51]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Mechanical properties and abrasion behaviour of concrete containing shredded PET bottle waste as a partial substitution of natural aggregate , 2014 .

[52]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[53]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings - A review , 2015 .

[54]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[55]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  Flexural behaviour of light-weight sandwich panels composed by concrete and EPS , 2012 .

[56]  Sam Rhea Sarcia Design and analysis of a concrete modular housing system constructed with 3D panels , 2004 .

[57]  Wahidul K. Biswas Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of a civil works program in a residential estate of Western Australia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[58]  Alistair B. Sproul,et al.  Design optimisation for a low energy home in Sydney , 2011 .

[59]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile , 2011 .

[60]  Zhengen Ren,et al.  Climate change adaptation pathways for Australian residential buildings , 2011 .

[61]  Wahidul Biswas,et al.  Global Warming Implications of the Use of By-Products and Recycled Materials in Western Australia’s Housing Sector , 2015, Materials.

[62]  M Guo,et al.  LCA data quality: sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[63]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study , 2014 .

[64]  David L. McCleese,et al.  Using monte carlo simulation in life cycle assessment for electric and internal combustion vehicles , 2002 .