High volumetric and energy densities of methane stored in nanoporous materials at ambient temperatures and moderate pressures

Experimental results for methane adsorption on two high-surface area carbons (TE7-20 and AX-21) and one metal-organic framework (MIL-101(Cr)) are presented, with isotherms obtained at temperatures ranging from 250 to 350 K and at pressures up to 15 MPa. The isotherms were analysed to determine if these materials could be viable alternatives for on-board solid-state storage of methane. The results show a very high adsorbate density in the pores of all materials, which for some can even exceed liquid methane density. At moderate pressures below 5 MPa, the calculated total energy densities are close to the energy density of methanol, and are almost 40% of the energy density of gasoline (petrol). Compared with standard compression at the same conditions, the results show that adsorption can be a competitive storage alternative, as it can offer equal volumetric capacities at much lower pressures, hence reducing the energy penalty associated with compression. It is shown that the optimal conditions for adsorptive methane storage in these materials are at moderate pressure ranges, where the gains in amounts stored when using an adsorbent are more pronounced when compared to cylinders of compressed methane gas at the same operating conditions. Finally, a study on deliverable capacities for adsorbed methane was carried out, simulating two charging pressure scenarios of 3.5 and 6.5 MPa and discharge at 0.5 MPa. The results show that some of the tested materials have high working volumetric capacities, with some materials displaying more than 140 kg m(-3) volumetric working capacity for charging at 6.5 MPa and delivery at 0.5 MPa. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  H. Furukawa,et al.  High Methane Storage Capacity in Aluminum Metal–Organic Frameworks , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Youn‐Sang Bae,et al.  Can Metal–Organic Frameworks Attain New DOE Targets for On-Board Methane Storage by Increasing Methane Heat of Adsorption? , 2014 .

[3]  C. Almansa,et al.  Contribution to the evaluation of density of methane adsorbed on activated carbon. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  P. Llewellyn,et al.  Is the bet equation applicable to microporous adsorbents , 2007 .

[5]  T. Mays,et al.  Analysis of hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials for low carbon energy applications. , 2011, Faraday discussions.

[6]  Jeffrey R. Long,et al.  Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for natural gas storage , 2014 .

[7]  Michael Hirscher,et al.  Nanosponges for hydrogen storage , 2012 .

[8]  Hong-Cai Zhou,et al.  Methane storage in advanced porous materials. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[9]  Sridhar Komarneni,et al.  Porous Adsorbents for Vehicular Natural Gas Storage: A Review , 1998 .

[10]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Optimum conditions for adsorptive storage. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  C. Serre,et al.  High uptakes of CO2 and CH4 in mesoporous metal-organic frameworks MIL-100 and MIL-101. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  Joaquín Silvestre-Albero,et al.  Physical characterization of activated carbons with narrow microporosity by nitrogen (77.4 K), carbon dioxide (273 K) and argon (87.3 K) adsorption in combination with immersion calorimetry , 2012 .

[13]  W. A. Poe,et al.  Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing , 2006 .

[14]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  A New Equation of State and Tables of Thermodynamic Properties for Methane Covering the Range from the Melting Line to 625 K at Pressures up to 100 MPa , 1991 .

[15]  Karen J. Edler,et al.  Size-controlled synthesis of MIL-101(Cr) nanoparticles with enhanced selectivity for CO2 over N2 , 2011 .

[16]  T. Mays,et al.  Modelling the potential of adsorbed hydrogen for use in aviation , 2015 .

[17]  C. Wilmer,et al.  Simultaneously high gravimetric and volumetric methane uptake characteristics of the metal-organic framework NU-111. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[18]  S. Dai,et al.  Quantum mechanical basis for kinetic diameters of small gaseous molecules. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[19]  M. Hirscher,et al.  Route to a family of robust, non-interpenetrated metal-organic frameworks with pto-like topology. , 2011, Chemistry.

[20]  R. Chahine,et al.  Modeling of adsorbent based hydrogen storage systems , 2012 .

[21]  Wei Zhou Methane storage in porous metal-organic frameworks: current records and future perspectives. , 2010, Chemical record.

[22]  T. Mays,et al.  Supercritical hydrogen adsorption in nanostructured solids with hydrogen density variation in pores , 2013, Adsorption.

[23]  T. Mays,et al.  Improving comparability of hydrogen storage capacities of nanoporous materials , 2012 .

[24]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas , 2014, Nature.

[25]  M. Hirscher,et al.  BET specific surface area and pore structure of MOFs determined by hydrogen adsorption at 20 K. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[26]  P. Bénard,et al.  Modeling of high-pressure adsorption isotherms above the critical temperature on microporous adsorbents: Application to methane , 1997 .

[27]  Donald J. Siegel,et al.  Methane Storage in Metal-Substituted Metal−Organic Frameworks: Thermodynamics, Usable Capacity, and the Impact of Enhanced Binding Sites , 2014 .

[28]  C. Serre,et al.  A Chromium Terephthalate-Based Solid with Unusually Large Pore Volumes and Surface Area , 2005, Science.

[29]  Gérard Férey,et al.  Calculating Geometric Surface Areas as a Characterization Tool for Metal−Organic Frameworks , 2007 .

[30]  Randall Q. Snurr,et al.  Ultrahigh Porosity in Metal-Organic Frameworks , 2010, Science.

[31]  T. Mays,et al.  Isosteric enthalpies for hydrogen adsorbed on nanoporous materials at high pressures , 2014, Adsorption.

[32]  Randall Q. Snurr,et al.  Large-Scale Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) Analysis of Methane Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks , 2013 .

[33]  S. Krause,et al.  A highly porous metal-organic framework, constructed from a cuboctahedral super-molecular building block, with exceptionally high methane uptake. , 2012, Chemical communications.

[34]  W. Zhou,et al.  A series of metal–organic frameworks with high methane uptake and an empirical equation for predicting methane storage capacity , 2013 .

[35]  X. L. Zhu,et al.  Atomic Mechanisms and Equation of State of Methane Adsorption in Carbon Nanopores , 2014 .

[36]  A. Hill,et al.  Methane storage in metal organic frameworks , 2012 .

[37]  Lev Sarkisov,et al.  Design of new materials for methane storage. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[38]  C. D. Collier,et al.  Metal-organic framework from an anthracene derivative containing nanoscopic cages exhibiting high methane uptake. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  B. Fultz,et al.  Anomalous isosteric enthalpy of adsorption of methane on zeolite-templated carbon. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  D. Do,et al.  A self-consistent method to determine accessible volume, area and pore size distribution (APSD) of BPL, Norit and AX-21 activated carbon , 2012 .

[41]  C. F. Curtiss,et al.  Molecular Theory Of Gases And Liquids , 1954 .

[42]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material (Cu3(TMA)2(H2O)3)n , 1999 .

[43]  C. Wilmer,et al.  Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[44]  Nuno Bimbo,et al.  Analysis of optimal conditions for adsorptive hydrogen storage in microporous solids , 2013 .

[45]  T. Engelder,et al.  Natural gas: Should fracking stop? , 2011, Nature.

[46]  R. A. Roberts,et al.  Standard nitrogen adsorption data for nonporous carbons , 1987 .

[47]  S. Gumma,et al.  Gas Adsorption Properties of the Chromium-Based Metal Organic Framework MIL-101 , 2009 .

[48]  Dan Zhao,et al.  An isoreticular series of metal-organic frameworks with dendritic hexacarboxylate ligands and exceptionally high gas-uptake capacity. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[49]  T. Yildirim,et al.  A porous metal-organic framework with dynamic pyrimidine groups exhibiting record high methane storage working capacity. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  M. Muir Physical Chemistry , 1888, Nature.

[51]  R. A. Roberts,et al.  Adsorption of nitrogen by porous and non-porous carbons , 1987 .

[52]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.