Information Fostering - Being Proactive with Information Seeking and Retrieval: Perspective Paper

People often have difficulty in expressing their information needs. Many times this results from a lack of clarity about the task at hand, or the way an information or search system works. In addition, people may not know what they do not know. The former is addressed by search systems by providing recommendations, whereas there are no good solutions for the latter problem. Even when a search system makes recommendations, they are limited to suggesting objects such as queries and documents only. They do not consider providing suggestions for strategies, people, or processes. This Perspective Paper addresses it by showing how to investigate the nature of the work a person is doing, predicting the potential problems they may encounter, and providing help to overcome those problems. This help could be an object such as a document or a query, a strategy, or a person. This whole process is referred to as Information Fostering. Beyond crafting a general-purpose recommender system, Information Fostering is the idea of providing proactive suggestions and help to information seekers. This could allow them avoid potential problems and capture promising opportunities from a search process before it is too late. The current paper presents this new perspective by outlining desired characteristics of an Information Fostering system, envisioning application scenarios, and proposing a set of potential methods for moving forward. Beyond these details, the primary purpose of this paper is to offer a new viewpoint that looks at the other side of the information seeking coin, by bringing together ideas from human-computer interaction, information retrieval, recommender systems, and education.

[1]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  The effect of time perspectives on mental health information processing and help-seeking attitudes and intentions in younger versus older adults , 2017, Aging & mental health.

[2]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[3]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook , 2011, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[4]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[5]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  John Dowell,et al.  Information seeking and use by newspaper journalists , 2003, J. Documentation.

[7]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[8]  Forbes Gibb,et al.  A model of uncertainty and its relation to information seeking and retrieval (IS&R) , 2014, J. Documentation.

[9]  Yasuyuki Sumi,et al.  Editorial: Awareness and the WWW , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Multi-Word Generative Query Recommendation Using Topic Modeling , 2016, RecSys.

[11]  Thomas D. Wilson,et al.  Human Information Behavior , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[12]  Chirag Shah,et al.  MineRank: Leveraging users' latent roles for unsupervised collaborative information retrieval , 2016, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Marzena Swigon,et al.  Information limits: definition, typology and types , 2011, Aslib Proc..

[14]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm , 2009, Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm.

[15]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Coagmento- A Collaborative Information Seeking, Synthesis and Sense-Making Framework (an integrated , 2009 .

[16]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Extracting Information Seeking Intentions for Web Search Sessions , 2016, SIGIR.

[17]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use , 1998, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  Jae Kyeong Kim,et al.  A literature review and classification of recommender systems research , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  James Allan,et al.  Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization , 2002 .

[20]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Query Generation as Result Aggregation for Knowledge Representation , 2017, HICSS.

[21]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  A survey of collaborative web search practices , 2008, CHI.

[22]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  What Can Searching Behavior Tell Us About the Difficulty of Information Tasks? A Study of Web Navigation , 2007, ASIST.

[23]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Rain or shine? Forecasting search process performance in exploratory search tasks , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Loren Terveen,et al.  Beyond Recommender Systems: Helping People Help Each Other , 2001 .

[25]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Exploring support for the unconquerable barriers in information seeking , 2016, ASIST.

[26]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Can search systems detect users' task difficulty?: some behavioral signals , 2010, SIGIR '10.

[27]  Jane Reid,et al.  A Task-Oriented Non-Interactive Evaluation Methodology for Information Retrieval Systems , 2000, Information Retrieval.

[28]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[29]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[30]  Alejandro López-Ortiz,et al.  Orthogonal query recommendation , 2013, RecSys.

[31]  Fan Yang,et al.  What does time constraint mean to information searchers? , 2014, IIiX.

[32]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Capturing Collabportunities: A method to evaluate collaboration opportunities in information search using pseudocollaboration , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Chirag Shah,et al.  User-driven system-mediated collaborative information retrieval , 2014, SIGIR.

[34]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Cognitive barriers to information seeking: A conceptual analysis , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Yu Guo,et al.  Be proactive for better decisions: Predicting information seeking in the context of earthquake risk , 2016 .

[36]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Braque: Design of an Interface to Support User Interaction in Information Retrieval , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Assessing the scenic route: measuring the value of search trails in web logs , 2010, SIGIR.

[38]  James Allan,et al.  Introduction to topic detection and tracking , 2002 .

[39]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Deepening the Role of the User: Neuro-Physiological Evidence as a Basis for Studying and Improving Search , 2016, CHIIR.

[40]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[41]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Investigating Information Seekers' Selection of Interpersonal and Impersonal Sources , 2017, CHIIR.

[42]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.

[43]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[44]  Jarkko Kari,et al.  Facing and bridging gaps in Web searching , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[45]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  On user studies and information needs , 2006, J. Documentation.