Sexual Offenders Against Children: The Influence of Personality and Obsessionality on Cognitive Distortions

Sexual offenders against children are generally inadequate in their social functioning and diverse in their psychopathology. The degree to which this inadequate functioning and psychopathology influences therapeutic interventions brings into question the belief that generic nonclinical programmatic treatment work is always appropriate for such a cohort. The Sex Offenders Assessment Package (SOAP) measures inadequate social functioning and sexual deviance, but has not been linked to broader individual differences and generic psychopathology. We collected information examining the relationship between the SOAP and standard measures of personality (the NEO-FFI) and obsessive-compulsiveness (MOCI) in a sample of 200 sexual offenders against children seen by the Probation Service. Factor analysis was used to reduce the SOAP to three reliable factors: emotional distress, cognitions supporting sex with children, and concern for others. These factors correlated respectively with higher Neuroticism and lower Extroversion; greater obsessive-compulsiveness on the MOCI, and trait Agreeableness, irrespective of whether or not one corrected for socially desirable responding. When partial correlation controlled for the influence of Neuroticism on the correlation between cognitions supporting sex with children and the MOCI, there was no change in the association between these variables. These results show that negative affect and obsessional tendencies are important underlying influences on the feelings and behavior of sexual offenders, that the obsessionality of the group is not attributable to Neuroticism, and suggest useful additional foci to enhance the treatment of this diverse clinical group.

[1]  John B. Campbell,et al.  Personality characteristics of sexual offenders , 1995 .

[2]  P. Costa,et al.  A comparison of five-factor personality dimensions in males with sexual dysfunction and males with paraphilia. , 1991, Journal of personality assessment.

[3]  C. Cliffordson Parents' Judgments and Students' Self-Judgments of Empathy: The Structure of Empathy and Agreement o , 2001 .

[4]  E. Byers,et al.  Positive and negative sexual cognitions: Subjective experience and relationships to sexual adjustment , 2001 .

[5]  E. Coleman,et al.  Psychiatric comorbidity and compulsive/impulsive traits in compulsive sexual behavior. , 2003, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[6]  C. Purdon,et al.  The Meta-Cognitive Beliefs Questionnaire: development of a measure of obsessional beliefs. , 2003, Behaviour research and therapy.

[7]  T. Judge,et al.  Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Stephen Nowicki,et al.  A locus of control scale for noncollege as well as college adults. , 1974 .

[10]  A. Beech,et al.  Evaluation of a National Prison-based Treatment Program for Sexual Offenders in England and Wales , 2003, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[11]  H. Eysenck Personality and Sexual Adjustment , 1971, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[12]  C. Friendship,et al.  Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders. , 2003 .

[13]  S. Gold,et al.  Sexual addiction: many conceptions, minimal data. , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[14]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality , 1985 .

[15]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality and Sexual Functioning of Transvestitic Fetishists and Other Paraphilics , 1991, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[16]  W. Marshall,et al.  Excessive Sexual Desire Disorder Among Sexual Offenders: The Development of a Research Project , 2001 .

[17]  P. Salkovskis,et al.  Cognitive–behavioural approach to understanding obsessional thinking , 1998, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[18]  Shahla Ahmadi,et al.  Sensational interests and general personality traits , 1999 .

[19]  Elizabeth J. Austin,et al.  Personality traits, personality disorders and sensational interests in mentally disordered offenders , 2003 .

[20]  G. Hall,et al.  Sexual offender recidivism revisited: a meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  Stuart Kirby,et al.  Paedophilia: Pathology, criminality, or both? The development of a multivariate model of offence behaviour in child sexual abuse , 1998 .

[22]  A. Beech A Psychometric Typology of Child Abusers , 1998 .

[23]  Con Stough,et al.  The big 5 dimensional personality approach to understanding sex offenders , 2001 .

[24]  T. Ward,et al.  The Role of Formulation-based Treatment for Sexual Offenders , 2000, Behaviour Change.

[25]  Peggy Heil,et al.  Crossover Sexual Offenses , 2003, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[26]  R. Hodgson,et al.  Obsessional-compulsive complaints. , 1977, Behaviour research and therapy.

[27]  A. Beech,et al.  Comparison of Sex Offenders to Nonoffenders on Selected Psychological Measures , 1999 .

[28]  P. Chesterman,et al.  Mentally ill sex offenders in a regional secure unit. II: Cognitions, perceptions and fantasies , 1998 .

[29]  Katie Witkiewitz,et al.  Reliability of Scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A Reliability Generalization Study , 2001 .

[30]  R. K. Hanson,et al.  Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[31]  G. Wilson,et al.  Personality of paedophile club members , 1983 .

[32]  Gail Steketee,et al.  Compulsive hoarding: current status of the research. , 2003, Clinical psychology review.

[33]  C. Purdon,et al.  Obsessive intrusive thoughts in nonclinical subjects. Part I. Content and relation with depressive, anxious and obsessional symptoms. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[34]  I. Deary,et al.  The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E , 2000 .

[35]  L. Stava,et al.  Personality characteristics of sex offenders: A review , 1987, Archives of sexual behavior.