A Dantzig‐Wolfe Decomposition‐Based Heuristic for Off‐line Capacity Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment

One of the critical elements in considering any real-time traffic management strategy requires assessing network traffic dynamics. Traffic is inherently dynamic, since it features congestion patterns that evolve over time and queues that form and dissipate over a planning horizon. Dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) is therefore gaining wider acceptance among agencies and practitioners as a more realistic representation of traffic phenomena than static traffic assignment. Though it is imperative to calibrate the DTA model such that it can accurately reproduce field observations and avoid erroneous flow predictions when evaluating traffic management strategies, DTA calibration is an onerous task due to the large number of variables that can be modified and the intensive computational resources required. To compliment other research on behavioral and trip table issues, this work focuses on DTA capacity calibration and presents an efficient Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition-based heuristic that decomposes the problem into a restricted master problem (RMP) and a series of pricing problems. The restricted master problem is a capacity manipulation problem, which can be solved by a linear programming solver. The pricing problem is the user optimal DTA which can be optimally solved by an existing combinatorial algorithm. In addition, the proposed set of dual variable approximation techniques is one of a very limited number of approaches that can be used to estimate network-wide dual information in facilitating algorithmic designs while maintaining scalability. Two networks of various sizes are empirically tested to demonstrate the efficiency and efficacy of the proposed heuristic. Based on the results, the proposed heuristic can calibrate the network capacity and match the counts within a 1% optimality gap.

[1]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Practical Bilevel Optimization , 1998 .

[2]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Behavior-based consistency-seeking models as deployment alternatives to dynamic traffic assignment models , 2006 .

[3]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL, PART II: NETWORK TRAFFIC , 1995 .

[4]  Kunal Kamlakar Kundé Calibration of mesoscopic traffic simulation models for dynamic traffic assignment , 2002 .

[5]  Maria Nadia Postorino,et al.  Fixed Point Approaches to the Estimation of O/D Matrices Using Traffic Counts on Congested Networks , 2001, Transp. Sci..

[6]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  A Combinatorial user optimal dynamic traffic assignment algorithm , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Shawn Turner,et al.  Archived Intelligent Transportation System Data Quality: Preliminary Analyses of San Antonio TransGuide Data , 2000 .

[8]  R. Horowitz,et al.  Methodological calibration of the cell transmission model , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[9]  Patrice Marcotte,et al.  An overview of bilevel optimization , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos,et al.  A Linear Programming Model for the Single Destination System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem , 2000, Transp. Sci..

[11]  E. Cascetta,et al.  A DAY-TO-DAY AND WITHIN-DAY DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC ASSIGNMENT MODEL , 1991 .

[12]  Adolf D May,et al.  TRAFFIC DETECTOR ERRORS AND DIAGNOSTICS , 1987 .

[13]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Development and Calibration of a Large-Scale Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model , 2004 .

[14]  Zhang Jian Calibration and Application of Self-Made TDR Probe , 2007 .

[15]  Bin Ran,et al.  Calibration and Validation of a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model , 2000 .

[16]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  Combinatorial Approach for Multiple-Destination User Optimal Dynamic Traffic Assignment , 2004 .

[17]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Offline Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment , 2007 .

[18]  Egon Balas,et al.  The Shifting Bottleneck Procedure for Job Shop Scheduling , 1988 .

[19]  H. Michael Zhang,et al.  A Polymorphic Dynamic Network Loading Model , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[20]  Ciprian Alecsandru,et al.  Improvement and Evaluation of Cell-Transmission Model for Operational Analysis of Traffic Networks: Freeway Case Study , 2006 .

[21]  Mark Campbell,et al.  Calibration and Application of a Simulation-Based Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model , 2004 .

[22]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[23]  C. Daganzo THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL.. , 1994 .

[24]  P. I. Richards Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[25]  H. Mahmassani,et al.  Toll Pricing and Heterogeneous Users , 2005 .

[26]  Ampol Karoonsoontawong,et al.  Robustness approach to the integrated network design problem, signal optimization and dynamic traffic assignment problem , 2006 .

[27]  Antoine G. Hobeika,et al.  Parameter optimization methods for estimating dynamic origin-destination trip-tables , 1997 .

[28]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  Optimal Long‐Term Infrastructure Maintenance Planning Accounting for Traffic Dynamics , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[29]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Detecting Errors and Imputing Missing Data for Single-Loop Surveillance Systems , 2003 .

[30]  Taehyung Park,et al.  Estimation of dynamic origin-destination trip tables for a general network , 2001 .

[31]  Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos,et al.  Foundations of Dynamic Traffic Assignment: The Past, the Present and the Future , 2001 .