Displacement laser interferometry with sub-nanometer uncertainty

Development in industry is asking for improved resolution and higher accuracy in mechanical measurement. Together with miniaturization the demand for sub nanometer uncertainty on dimensional metrology is increasing rapidly. Displacement laser interferometers are used widely as precision displacement measuring systems. This thesis describes the error sources which should be considered when measuring with these systems with (sub-)nanometer uncertainty, along with possible methods to overcome these errors. Whenconsidering interferometricdisplacementmeasurementswithnanometer uncertainty over small distances (below 1 mm) the measurements are influenced by periodic deviations originating frompolarizationmixing. Inmeasurements with nanometer uncertainty over larger distances this errormay become negligible compared to errors introduced by the refractive index changes of the medium in which the measurement takes place. In order to investigate the effect of periodic deviations, models were developed and tested. A model based on Jones matrices enables the prediction of periodic deviations originating from errors in optical alignment and polarization errors of the components of the interferometer. In order to enable the incorporation of polarization properties of components used in interferometers, different measurement setups are discussed. Novel measurement setups are introduced to measure the polarization properties of a heterodyne laser head used in the interferometer system. Based on ellipsometry a setup is realized to measure the polarization properties of the optical components of the laser interferometer. With use of measurements carried out with these setups and the model it can be concluded that periodic deviations originating from different error sources can not be superimposed, as interaction exists whichmay cause partial compensation. To examine the correctness of the predicted periodic deviations an entire interferometer system was placed on a traceable calibration setup based on a Fabry-P´erot interferometer. This system enables a calibration with an uncertainty of 0,94 nm over a range of 300 µm. Prior to this measurement the polarization properties of the separate components were measured to enable a good prediction of periodic deviations with the model. The measurements compared to the model revealed a standard deviation of 0,14 nm for small periodic deviations and a standard deviation of 0,3 nm for periodic deviations viii 0. ABSTRACT with amplitudes of several nanometers. As a result the Jones model combined with the setups for measurement of the polarization properties form a practical tool for designers of interferometer systems and optical components. This tool enables the designer to choose the right components and alignment tolerances for a practical setup with (sub-)nanometer uncertainty specifications. A second traceable calibration setup based on a Fabry-P´erot cavity was developed and built. Compared to the existing setup it has a higher sensitivity, smaller range and improved uncertainty of 0,24 nm over a range of 1 µm, and 0,40 nm over a range of 6 µm. To improve the uncertainty of existing laser interferometer systems a new compensation method for heterodyne laser interferometerswas proposed. It is based on phase quadraturemeasurement in combination with a compensation algorithm based on Heydemann’s compensation which is used frequently in homodyne interferometry. The system enables a compensation of periodic deviations with an amplitude of 8 nm down to an uncertainty of 0,2 nm. From measurements it appears that ghost reflections occurring in the optical system of the interferometer cannot be compensated by this method. Regarding the refractive index of air three measurement methods were compared. The three empirical equations which can be found in literature, an absolute refractometer based on a commercial interferometer and a newly developed tracker system based on a Fabry-P´erot cavity. The tracker was tested to investigate the feasibility of the method for absolute refractometry with improved uncertainty. The developed tracker had a relative uncertainty of 8 ·10-10. The comparison revealed some temperature effectswhich cannot be explained yet. However the results of the comparison indicate that an absolute refractometer based on a Fabry-P´erot cavity will improve the uncertainty of refractive index measurement compared to existing methods.

[1]  P. Ciddor Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared. , 1996, Applied optics.

[2]  T J Quinn,et al.  Practical realization of the definition of the metre, including recommended radiations of other optical frequency standards (2001) , 2003 .

[3]  Bawh Bastiaan Knarren Application of optical fibres in precision heterodyne laser interferometry , 2003 .

[4]  G N Peggs,et al.  A review of recent work in sub-nanometre displacement measurement using optical and X–ray interferometry , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Laser frequency stabilization by polarization spectroscopy of a reflecting reference cavity , 1980 .

[6]  V. Badami,et al.  A frequency domain method for the measurement of nonlinearity in heterodyne interferometry , 2000 .

[7]  J. L. Hall,et al.  Real-time precision refractometry: new approaches. , 1997, Applied optics.

[8]  A. Schawlow Lasers , 2018, Acta Ophthalmologica.

[9]  F Bayer-Helms,et al.  Längenstabilität bei Raumtemperatur von Proben der Glaskeramik "Zerodur" , 1985 .

[10]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Design and calibration of a parallel-moving displacement generator for nano-metrology , 1998 .

[11]  J. Stümpel,et al.  Combined optical and X–ray interferometry for high–precision dimensional metrology , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  John L. Hall,et al.  Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator , 1983 .

[13]  J. Lawall,et al.  Heterodyne interferometer with subatomic periodic nonlinearity. , 1999, Applied optics.

[14]  Michael A. Player,et al.  Importance of rotational beam alignment in the generation of second harmonic errors in laser heterodyne interferometry , 1993 .

[15]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Linear interpolation of periodic error in a heterodyne laser interferometer at subnanometer levels (dimension measurement) , 1989 .

[16]  Y. Xie,et al.  Elliptical polarization and nonorthogonality of stabilized Zeeman laser output. , 1989, Applied optics.

[17]  E C. Teague,et al.  Electronic limitations in phase meters for heterodyne interferometry , 1993 .

[18]  Hunter Rouse,et al.  Elementary mechanics of fluids , 1946 .

[19]  Ondrej Cip,et al.  A scale-linearization method for precise laser interferometry , 2000 .

[20]  Phj Piet Schellekens,et al.  Measurements of the Refractive Index of Air Using Interference Refractometers , 1983 .

[21]  T. Quinn,et al.  INTERNATIONAL REPORTS: Mise en Pratique of the Definition of the Metre (1992) , 1994 .

[22]  K. P. Birch,et al.  An Updated Edln Equation for the Refractive Index of Air , 1993 .

[23]  L. Howard,et al.  Real-time displacement measurements with a Fabry-Perot cavity and a diode laser , 2001 .

[24]  Sfcl Serge Wetzels Laser based displacement calibration with nanometre accuracy , 1998 .

[25]  Phj Piet Schellekens Absolute meetnauwkeurigheid van technische laserinterferometers , 1986 .

[26]  P L Heydemann,et al.  Determination and correction of quadrature fringe measurement errors in interferometers. , 1981, Applied optics.

[27]  Hyun-Seung Choi,et al.  A simple method for the compensation of the nonlinearity in the heterodyne interferometer , 2002 .

[28]  Mjm Marcel Renkens,et al.  An accurate interference refractometer based on a permanent vacuum chamber : development and results , 1993 .

[29]  R. Deslattes,et al.  Analytical modeling of the periodic nonlinearity in heterodyne interferometry. , 1998, Applied optics.

[30]  B. Edĺen The Refractive Index of Air , 1966 .

[31]  H Han Haitjema Dynamic probe calibration in the μm region with nanometric accuracy , 1996 .

[32]  M. Pisani,et al.  A sample scanning system with nanometric accuracy for quantitative SPM measurements. , 2001, Ultramicroscopy.

[33]  J. Pate Introduction to Optics , 1937, Nature.

[34]  F. Demarest,et al.  High-resolution, high-speed, low data age uncertainty, heterodyne displacement measuring interferometer electronics , 1998 .

[35]  Wenmei Hou,et al.  Drift of nonlinearity in the heterodyne interferometer , 1994 .

[36]  Gwo-Sheng Peng,et al.  Correction of nonlinearity in one-frequency optical interferometry , 1996 .

[37]  Yi Xie,et al.  Zeeman laser interferometer errors for high-precision measurements. , 1992, Applied optics.

[38]  R. Davis,et al.  Equation for the Determination of the Density of Moist Air (1981/91) , 1992 .

[39]  Chien-ming Wu Periodic nonlinearity resulting from ghost reflections in heterodyne interferometry , 2003 .

[40]  Wenmei Hou,et al.  Investigation and compensation of the nonlinearity of heterodyne interferometers , 1992 .

[41]  P Giacomo,et al.  Equation for the Determination of the Density of Moist Air (1981) , 1982 .

[42]  Lowell P. Howard,et al.  A simple technique for observing periodic nonlinearities in Michelson interferometers , 1998 .

[43]  Kiyoshi Takamasu,et al.  Uncertainty in pitch measurements of one-dimensional grating standards using a nanometrological atomic force microscope , 2003 .

[44]  M. L. Mcglashan,et al.  The international temperature scale of 1990 (ITS-90) , 1990 .

[45]  Kai Dirscherl,et al.  Developments on the NMi-VSL traceable scanning probe microscope , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[46]  N. Bobroff,et al.  Residual errors in laser interferometry from air turbulence and nonlinearity. , 1987, Applied optics.

[47]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Modeling and verifying non-linearities in heterodyne displacement interferometry , 2002 .

[48]  J. Tait,et al.  Deep-Sea Research , 1954, Nature.

[49]  The influence of polarization states on non-linearities in laser interferometry , 2002 .

[50]  Ian J. Spalding,et al.  Laser physics , 1977, Nature.

[51]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Calibration of displacement sensors up to 300 µm with nanometre accuracy and direct traceability to a primary standard of length , 2000 .

[52]  R. Azzam,et al.  Polarization properties of corner-cube retroreflectors: theory and experiment. , 1997, Applied optics.

[53]  WO Wouter Pril,et al.  Development of high precision mechanical probes for coordinate measuring machines , 2002 .

[54]  Phj Piet Schellekens,et al.  Development of a Traceable Laser-Based Displacement Calibration System with Nanometer Accuracy , 1997 .

[55]  Michael A. Player,et al.  Polarization Effects in Heterodyne Interferometry , 1995 .

[56]  J. M. D. Freitas,et al.  Analysis of laser source birefringence and dichroism on nonlinearity in heterodyne interferometry , 1997 .

[57]  C M Sutton,et al.  Non-linearity in length measurement using heterodyne laser Michelson interferometry , 1987 .

[58]  L. J. Cox Ellipsometry and Polarized Light , 1978 .

[59]  T.A.M. Ruijl,et al.  Ultra Precision Coordinate Measuring Machine - Design, Calibration and Error Compensation , 2001 .

[60]  R. Thalmann,et al.  Accurate measurement of the refractive index of air , 1994 .