Characteristics associated with marginal hearing loss and subjective well-being among a sample of older adults.

The influence of marginal hearing loss on subjective well-being was studied in order to assess the audiological rehabilitation needs of older individuals. Behavioral and audiological data were obtained from 40 subjects 61-81 years of age. Group A included 20 subjects with normal audiometric thresholds. Group B included 20 subjects with mild-to-moderate degrees of high-frequency hearing loss. Each subject completed a hearing loss screening survey, an Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment (ATD PA) and a Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). The PHAP and hearing loss screen were adequate assessments of self-reported hearing loss, as was the subjective rating of hearing section of the ATD PA. People with high-frequency marginal hearing loss reported on the ATD PA less satisfaction with their independence, reduced emotional well-being, and more limitation from their hearing loss than those with normal hearing. It is concluded that marginal degrees of hearing loss in older persons can influence subjective well-being, which suggests the importance of a renewed emphasis on audiological rehabilitation for this population.

[1]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[2]  M J Scherer,et al.  Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  P. Kricos Audiologic Rehabilitation For The Elderly: A Collaborative Approach , 1997 .

[4]  Older adult performance on the communication profile for the hearing impaired. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  A. Holmes,et al.  Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  R M Cox,et al.  Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  I. Nabelek,et al.  Estimation of client-assessed hearing aid performance based upon unaided variables. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  R M Cox,et al.  Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms , 1997, Hearing Research.

[11]  D. Garstecki Older Adults: Hearing Handicap and Hearing Aid Management , 1996 .

[12]  D. Garstecki,et al.  Older Women and Hearing , 1995 .

[13]  L. Marshall,et al.  Auditory processing in aging listeners. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[14]  M E Demorest,et al.  Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.