Comparison of Martian surface ionizing radiation measurements from MSL‐RAD with Badhwar‐O'Neill 2011/HZETRN model calculations

Dose rate measurements from Mars Science Laboratory-radiation assessment detector (MSL-RAD) for 300 sols on Mars are compared to simulation results using the Badhwar-O'Neill 2011 galactic cosmic ray (GCR) environment model and the high-charge and energy transport (HZETRN) code. For the nuclear interactions of primary GCR through Mars atmosphere and Curiosity rover, the quantum multiple scattering theory of nuclear fragmentation is used. Daily atmospheric pressure is measured at Gale Crater by the MSL Rover Environmental Monitoring Station. Particles impinging on top of the Martian atmosphere reach RAD after traversing varying depths of atmosphere that depend on the slant angles, and the model accounts for shielding of the RAD “E” detector (used for dosimetry) by the rest of the instrument. Simulation of average dose rate is in good agreement with RAD measurements for the first 200 sols and reproduces the observed variation of surface dose rate with changing heliospheric conditions and atmospheric pressure. Model results agree less well between sols 200 and 300 due to subtleties in the changing heliospheric conditions. It also suggests that the average contributions of albedo particles (charge number Z < 3) from Martian regolith comprise about 10% and 42% of the average daily point dose and dose equivalent, respectively. Neutron contributions to tissue-averaged effective doses will be reduced compared to point dose equivalent estimates because a large portion of the neutron point dose is due to low-energy neutrons with energies <1 MeV, which do not penetrate efficiently to deep-seated tissues. However the exposures from neutrons to humans on Mars should become an important consideration in radiobiology research and risk assessment.

[1]  W. T. Lawrence,et al.  Abrasion-Ablation Model for Neutron Production in Heavy Ion Reactions , 1995 .

[2]  D. Hassler,et al.  Description of light ion production cross sections and fluxes on the Mars surface using the QMSFRG model , 2007, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[3]  S. Blattnig,et al.  Monte Carlo Analysis of Pion Contribution to Absorbed Dose from Galactic Cosmic Rays , 2013 .

[4]  Francis A. Cucinotta,et al.  How Safe Is Safe Enough? Radiation Risk for a Human Mission to Mars , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Francis A. Cucinotta,et al.  Physical and Biological Organ Dosimetry Analysis for International Space Station Astronauts , 2008, Radiation research.

[6]  J. Wilson,et al.  A space radiation transport method development. , 2004, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[7]  L. Pinsky,et al.  Coupled neutron transport for HZETRN , 2010 .

[8]  Ianik Plante,et al.  Nuclear interactions in heavy ion transport and event-based risk models. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  Martin H. Israel,et al.  RECORD-SETTING COSMIC-RAY INTENSITIES IN 2009 AND 2010 , 2010 .

[10]  B. Reddell,et al.  Pion and electromagnetic contribution to dose: Comparisons of HZETRN to Monte Carlo results and ISS data , 2013 .

[11]  L. Sihver,et al.  Dose estimation for astronauts using dose conversion coefficients calculated with the PHITS code and the ICRP/ICRU adult reference computational phantoms , 2011, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[12]  M. Shea,et al.  CREME96: A Revision of the Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro-Electronics Code , 1997 .

[13]  H. Cane.  Coronal Mass Ejections and Forbush Decreases , 2000 .

[14]  Aric R. Aumann,et al.  Comparison of the transport codes HZETRN, HETC and FLUKA for galactic cosmic rays , 2011 .

[15]  R. Nymmik.  Time lag of galactic cosmic ray modulation: conformity to general regularities and influence on particle energy spectra , 2000 .

[16]  J. Wilson,et al.  Galactic cosmic ray transport methods: past, present, and future. , 1994, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[17]  H. W. Babcock.  The Topology of the Sun's Magnetic Field and the 22-YEAR Cycle. , 1961 .

[18]  Steve R. Blattnig,et al.  Comparison of the transport codes HZETRN, HETC and FLUKA for a solar particle event , 2011 .

[19]  E. Sebastián,et al.  REMS: The Environmental Sensor Suite for the Mars Science Laboratory Rover , 2012 .

[20]  T. Slaba,et al.  NUCFRG3: Light ion improvements to the nuclear fragmentation model , 2011 .

[21]  A. Mairani,et al.  The physics of the FLUKA code: Recent developments , 2007 .

[22]  F. A. Cucinotta,et al.  A solar cycle statistical model for the projection of space radiation environment , 2006 .

[23]  A. Vasavada,et al.  Mars’ Surface Radiation Environment Measured with the Mars Science Laboratory’s Curiosity Rover , 2014, Science.

[24]  P. O'Neill,et al.  Badhwar–O'Neill 2010 Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Model—Revised , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[25]  Javier Gómez-Elvira,et al.  Diurnal variations of energetic particle radiation at the surface of Mars as observed by the Mars Science Laboratory Radiation Assessment Detector , 2014 .

[26]  Francis A. Cucinotta,et al.  Space Radiation Cancer Risk Projections and Uncertainties - 2010 , 2011 .

[27]  G. Reitz,et al.  An Adaptive Response to Uncertainty Generates Positive and Negative Contrast Effects , 2014 .

[28]  W. Feldman,et al.  MCNPX benchmark for cosmic ray interactions with the Moon , 2006 .

[29]  P. O'Neill.  Badhwar - O'Neill 2014 Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Model Description , 2015 .

[30]  G. Reitz,et al.  The Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) Investigation , 2012 .

[31]  P. M. O'Neill,et al.  An improved model of galactic cosmic radiation for space exploration missions , 1991 .

[32]  F. Cucinotta,et al.  Description of Transport Codes for Space Radiation Shielding , 2012, Health physics.

[33]  Eugene N. Parker,et al.  THE PASSAGE OF ENERGETIC CHARGED PARTICLES THROUGH INTERPLANETARY SPACE , 1965 .