Analyzing Uncertainty in Complex Socio-Ecological Networks

Socio-ecological systems are recognized as complex adaptive systems whose multiple interactions might change as a response to external or internal changes. Due to its complexity, the behavior of the system is often uncertain. Bayesian networks provide a sound approach for handling complex domains endowed with uncertainty. The aim of this paper is to analyze the impact of the Bayesian network structure on the uncertainty of the model, expressed as the Shannon entropy. In particular, three strategies for model structure have been followed: naive Bayes (NB), tree augmented network (TAN) and network with unrestricted structure (GSS). Using these network structures, two experiments are carried out: (1) the impact of the Bayesian network structure on the entropy of the model is assessed and (2) the entropy of the posterior distribution of the class variable obtained from the different structures is compared. The results show that GSS constantly outperforms both NB and TAN when it comes to evaluating the uncertainty of the entire model. On the other hand, NB and TAN yielded lower entropy values of the posterior distribution of the class variable, which makes them preferable when the goal is to carry out predictions.

[1]  F. D. Pineda,et al.  Effects of a protected area on land-use dynamics and socioeconomic development of local populations , 2012 .

[2]  Marco Scutari,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package , 2009, 0908.3817.

[3]  Susana Suárez-Seoane,et al.  Modelling the risk of land cover change from environmental and socio-economic drivers in heterogeneous and changing landscapes: The role of uncertainty , 2011 .

[4]  Steven Broekx,et al.  A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Daniel Zelterman,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2005, Technometrics.

[6]  Francisco Moreira,et al.  Temporal (1958–1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrence , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  M. Schlüter,et al.  Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems: an analytical framework , 2019, Ecology and Society.

[8]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[9]  S. Hallett,et al.  Driving Forces of Land-Use Change in a Cultural Landscape of Spain , 2007 .

[10]  F. Müller,et al.  The indicator side of ecosystem services , 2012 .

[11]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[12]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Ambio.

[13]  Rafael Rumí,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[15]  F. D. Pineda,et al.  Relationship between landscape typology and socioeconomic structure: Scenarios of change in Spanish cultural landscapes , 2003 .

[16]  J. Blondel.  The ‘Design’ of Mediterranean Landscapes: A Millennial Story of Humans and Ecological Systems during the Historic Period , 2006 .

[17]  A. Rescia,et al.  Cultural landscapes as complex adaptive systems: the cases of northern Spain and northern Argentina , 2012 .

[18]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Future landscapes: managing within complexity , 2012 .

[19]  Rosa F. Ropero,et al.  Modelling uncertainty in social-natural interactions , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach , 2012 .

[21]  F. D. Pineda,et al.  Modelling of landscape changes derived from the dynamics of socio-ecological systems: A case of study in a semiarid Mediterranean landscape , 2008 .

[22]  A. D. Maldonado,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of the relationship between socioeconomy and ecosystem services in cultural landscapes , 2018, Ecosystem Services.