The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Crum | E. Cibas | W. Faquin | S. Nasser | Selim M. Nasser
[1] Thomas C Wright,et al. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Cytological Abnormalities. , 2002, Journal of lower genital tract disease.
[2] Thomas C Wright,et al. Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological Abnormalities , 2002 .
[3] A. Renshaw,et al. Extensively keratinized squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix are difficult to grade. , 2001, American journal of clinical pathology.
[4] J. Kurtis,et al. Evaluation of mild‐to‐moderate dysplasia on cervical‐endocervical (Pap) smear: A subgroup of patients who bridge LSIL and HSIL , 2000, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[5] Koss Lg. Correspondence re: Sherman ME, Tabbara SO, Scott DR, Kurman RJ, Glass AG, Manos MM, et al. "Ascus, rule out HSIL": cytologic features, histologic correlates, and human papillomavirus detection. Mod Pathol 1999;12:335-42. , 2000 .
[6] V. Wright,et al. Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: A Cytohistological Study in a Colposcopy Clinic , 1999, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[7] E. Cibas,et al. Cytologic characteristics of abnormal cells in prior “normal” cervical/vaginal papanicolaou smears from women with a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion , 1999, Cancer.
[8] M. Sherman,et al. "ASCUS, rule out HSIL": cytologic features, histologic correlates, and human papillomavirus detection. , 1999, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.
[9] A. Miller,et al. Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[10] Lydia P. Howell,et al. NATURAL HISTORY OF CERVICAL SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESIONS: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[11] L Beardsley,et al. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.
[12] Deqin Sun,et al. Coexistence of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: morphologic progression or multiple papillomaviruses? , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.
[13] J. Kurinczuk,et al. The "Inconclusive‐Possible high grade epithelial abnormality" category in papanicolaou smear reporting , 1998, Cancer.
[14] C. Crum,et al. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[15] L. Elit,et al. Assessment of cytologic follow‐up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions , 1998, Cancer.
[16] David C. Wilbur,et al. Human Papillomavirus , 1998, Acta Cytologica.
[17] D. Wilbur,et al. Human papillomavirus: IAC Task Force summary. , 1998 .
[18] C. Crum,et al. Disparities in mean age and histopathologic grade between human papillomavirus type-specific early cervical neoplasms. , 1997, Human Pathology.
[19] D. Wilbur,et al. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization. , 1997 .
[20] C. Crum,et al. A comparison of early (E7) and late (L1) primer-mediated amplification of papillomaviral DNA in cervical neoplasia. , 1996, Molecular and cellular probes.
[21] M. Sherman,et al. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.
[22] Jones Ba,et al. Cervical biopsy-cytology correlation. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 22 439 correlations in 348 laboratories. , 1996 .
[23] L. Collins,et al. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management. , 1996, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.
[24] C. Crum,et al. Viral and histopathologic correlates of MN and MIB-1 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1996, Human pathology.
[25] B. Jones,et al. Cervical biopsy-cytology correlation. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 22 439 correlations in 348 laboratories. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[26] M. Stanley. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes for Terminology and Specimen Adequacy Authors: Robert J. Kurman and Diane Solomon Springer‐Verlag, New York, 1994 , 1995 .
[27] M. Sherman,et al. Low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: Cytologic predictors of biopsy Confirmation , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[28] M. Meyer,et al. Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical swab samples by ViraPap and in cervical biopsy specimens by in situ hybridization. , 1993, American journal of clinical pathology.
[29] M. Henry,et al. Atypical cervical cytology. Colposcopic follow-up using the Bethesda System. , 1993, The Journal of reproductive medicine.
[30] T. Wright,et al. Typing of human papillomaviruses by polymerase chain reaction amplification with L1 consensus primers and RFLP analysis. , 1992, Molecular and cellular probes.
[31] R Reid,et al. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital types. , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[32] K. Holmes,et al. Significance of mild cervical cytologic atypia in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population. , 1989, Acta cytologica.
[33] P. Arstila,et al. Comparison of Smear Specimens with Biopsy Specimens in a Nucleic Acid Hybridization Test for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Infection , 1989, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.