A multidimensional scaling and participatory design approach to classify open ended aircraft maintenance data

The quality assurance data to be analyzed by the web-based surveillance and auditing tool (WebSAT) is both qualitative and quantitative. The forced responses to checklist questions provide a definitive outcome identifying the effectiveness of the four quality assurance work functions. On the other hand, open-ended responses, the second type of response for capturing maintenance errors, are qualitative in nature since they reflect what the auditors and quality assurance representatives observe during their interactions at vendor locations. This research proposes to apply the statistical technique of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and the User centered Design (UCD) method of Participatory Design (PD) to categorize open-ended responses into suitable performance metrics of aircraft safety and organizational cost. Given the importance of the open-ended comments made in the quality assurance process, it is critical to capture all open-ended response data in addition to the attribute data acquired from the forced responses. While WebSAT proposes to capture both types of information, the open-ended responses require interpretation to ensure their appropriate application in the maintenance/inspection process; that is, this data must be associated with the appropriate measures of the maintenance process. This research then establishes performance measures implying the impact of audit and surveillance findings on aircraft safety and establishes another list of performance measures implying the impact of audit and surveillance findings on the organization. These performance measures are referred to as aircraft level impact (ALI) and organizational categories

[1]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Reflections on participatory design: lessons from the trillium experience , 1990, CHI '90.

[2]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A Human Error Approach to Accident Investigation: The Taxonomy of Unsafe Operations , 1997 .

[3]  Lawrence E. Jones,et al.  Structure of a social environment: Longitudinal individual differences scaling of an intact group. , 1972 .

[4]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Aiding the analysis of human actions in large-scale systems: an intelligent interface approach , 1996 .

[5]  Donald E. Brown,et al.  Data mining corrosion from Eddy current non-destructive tests , 2002 .

[6]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[7]  Te-sheng Li,et al.  A hybrid approach of rough set theory and genetic algorithm for fault diagnosis , 2005 .

[8]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Human reliability data requirements , 1995 .

[9]  Robert Sargent,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process , 2000 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[11]  R. Helmreich On error management: lessons from aviation , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[13]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .

[14]  Cheng‐Hua Wang,et al.  A stochastic maintenance management model with recovery factor , 2004 .

[15]  Dylan D. Schmorrow,et al.  A Preliminary Human Factors Analysis of Naval Aviation Maintenance Related Mishaps , 1998 .

[16]  Yang Hui,et al.  An artificial intelligence system of trouble diagnosis for aircraft engines , 1996 .

[17]  S. Green How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  Michael J. Muller Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique , 1992, CHI.

[19]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach , 1997 .

[20]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  An integrated joint optimization procedure for robust and tolerance design , 2000 .

[21]  Myron Wish,et al.  Three-Way Multidimensional Scaling , 1978 .

[22]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Error Types and Related Error Detection Mechanisms in the Aviation Domain: An Analysis of Aviation Safety Reporting System Incident Reports , 2000 .

[24]  Rachael Luck,et al.  Dialogue in participatory design , 2003 .

[25]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  ECONOMIC INTEGRATION OF DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[26]  Gary R. Weckman,et al.  Modeling the reliability of repairable systems in the aviation industry , 2001 .

[27]  Trefor P. Williams,et al.  Using neural networks to predict component inspection requirements for aging aircraft , 1996 .

[28]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  APPLYING REASON: THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS) , 2001 .

[29]  P. S. Vivekananthan,et al.  A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Mattias Holmgren,et al.  Maintenance‐related losses at the Swedish Rail , 2005 .

[31]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[32]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[33]  Bernice W. Polemis Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[34]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) , 2001 .

[35]  Manoj S. Patankar,et al.  Posterior probabilities of causal factors leading to unairworthy dispatch after maintenance , 2003 .