Multiobjective autocalibration for semidistributed water quality models

[1] ESWAT is a simulator that integrates catchment and river water quantity and quality processes. The integration leads to a high number of model parameters, which complicates model calibration. As the model is semidistributed, the water quality and quantity variables at different observation sites inside the catchment can, and should, be used during this process, in order to use all the available information. A simultaneous use of all the different observed series and a high number of free parameters, however, creates a complex mathematical problem. Existing methods such as Pareto-optimization are practically very difficult, if not impossible, to implement. We present therefore a new methodology that reduces the many objective functions to a single global criterion in an objective way, excluding the weighting problem. The global criterion then is minimized using a global search algorithm, i.e., the shuffled complex evolution method. The methodology is applied on the Dender River basin (Belgium), a heavily modified river basin with irregular flows.

[1]  Luis A. Bastidas,et al.  Multicriteria parameter estimation for models of stream chemical composition , 2002 .

[2]  I. Masliev,et al.  On Reconciliation of Traditional Water Quality Models and Activated Sludge Models , 1995 .

[3]  C. H. Rochester,et al.  Adsorption from solution at the solid/liquid interface , 1983 .

[4]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[5]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[6]  A van Griensven,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration of an integral dynamic model for river water quality. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  George Kuczera,et al.  The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models , 1997 .

[8]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives , 2003 .

[9]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  Evaluation of pollution reduction scenarios in a river basin: application of long term water quality simulations , 1997 .

[10]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[11]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[12]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[13]  P. Reichert,et al.  River Water Quality Modelling: II. Problems of the Art , 1998 .

[14]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[15]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  A multisignal automatic calibration methodology for hydrochemical models: A case study of the Birkenes Model , 1988 .

[16]  H. Gijzen Anaerobic digestion for sustainable development: a natural approach , 2002 .

[17]  A. van Griensven,et al.  Integral water quality modelling of catchments. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[19]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Assessing the Birkenes Model of stream acidification using a multisignal calibration methodology , 1988 .

[20]  K. Kennedy,et al.  Anaerobic degradation kinetics of 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) with linear sorption , 1997 .

[21]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..