Contributing to the sustainable development goals as normative and instrumental acts: The role of Buddhist religious logics in family SMEs

Prior studies suggest that religion matters in the adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives in SMEs. This study draws on an institutional logics perspective to illuminate a hitherto underexplored interplay of multiple logics that in combination influence family SMEs when pursuing CSR. Based on a qualitative study of family SMEs in Northern Vietnam, this article aims to deepen our understanding of how constellations of institutional logics entwine to influence their CSR initiatives, in particular where these initiatives include commitments to contributing towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals. We find that when a religious logic is present there is a shift away from the dominance of a family logic and a turn towards a community logic. Further, whereas non-religious family SMEs act instrumentally towards CSR initiatives, seeking benefits primarily for the family and the firm, a religious logic introduces a normative character to the market logic, whereby economic benefits are construed as resources to support local communities rather than the family. Implications for theory, practice and further research are offered.

[1]  M. Vu,et al.  Beyond the Inclusion–Exclusion Binary: Right Mindfulness and Its Implications for Perceived Inclusion and Exclusion in the Workplace , 2023, Journal of Business Ethics.

[2]  Arndt Werner,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field , 2023, Journal of business ethics : JBE.

[3]  Christine Schliesser On the Significance of Religion for the SDGs , 2023 .

[4]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Examining Heterogeneous Configurations of Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms Through the Formalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy , 2023, Family Business Review.

[5]  John James Cater III,et al.  How Faith Affects the Leadership of U. S. Family Firm Owners , 2022, Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion.

[6]  N. Lattanzi,et al.  Drivers and nuances of sustainable development goals: Transcending corporate social responsibility in family firms , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[7]  R. Sorenson,et al.  Family Social Capital in Family Business: A Faith-Based Values Theory , 2022, Journal of Business Ethics.

[8]  M. Vu,et al.  Our social legacy will go on: Understanding outcomes of family SME succession through engaged Buddhism , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[9]  S. Kraus,et al.  Sustainability in family business: Mechanisms, technologies and business models for achieving economic prosperity, environmental quality and social equity , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  Allan Discua Cruz,et al.  Green innovation in the Latin American agri-food industry: understanding the influence of family involvement and business practices , 2022, British Food Journal.

[11]  K. Randerson Conceptualizing family business social responsibility , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[12]  Thomas Andersson,et al.  Family members as hybrid owner-managers in family-owned newspaper companies: handling multiple institutional logics , 2021, Journal of Family Business Management.

[13]  Raj V. Mahto,et al.  Sustainability in family business – A bibliometric study and a research agenda , 2021 .

[14]  Yogesh K. Dwivedi,et al.  Investigating environmental sustainability in small family-owned businesses: Integration of religiosity, ethical judgment, and theory of planned behavior , 2021 .

[15]  M. Vu,et al.  Bring Your Non-self to Work? The Interaction Between Self-decentralization and Moral Reasoning , 2021, Journal of Business Ethics.

[16]  K. Nishitani,et al.  Are corporate environmental activities to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs) simply greenwashing? An empirical study of environmental management control systems in Vietnamese companies from the stakeholder management perspective. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Brett R. Smith,et al.  Toward a theological turn in entrepreneurship: How religion could enable transformative research in our field , 2021 .

[18]  O. Boiral,et al.  Organizations' engagement with sustainable development goals: From cherry‐picking to SDG‐washing? , 2021, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[19]  M. Vu,et al.  The Influence of Spiritual Traditions on the Interplay of Subjective and Normative Interpretations of Meaningful Work , 2021, Journal of Business Ethics.

[20]  L. Naldi,et al.  Bridging locality and internationalization – A research agenda on the sustainable development of family firms , 2021, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development.

[21]  Eva Collins,et al.  Family logics and environmental sustainability: A study of the New Zealand wine industry , 2021 .

[22]  V. Kane,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in Vietnam: views from corporate and NGO executives , 2021 .

[23]  F. Melissen,et al.  Bolstering responsible management education through the sustainable development goals: Three perspectives , 2021, Management Learning.

[24]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility , 2019, Human Relations.

[25]  Christian Fisch,et al.  Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis , 2019, Management Review Quarterly.

[26]  S. Gutiérrez-Broncano,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises: Multigroup analysis of family vs. nonfamily firms , 2020 .

[27]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Should we patent it or keep it a secret? The moderating role of proactive orientation in family versus non-family SMEs , 2020 .

[28]  Karen Locke,et al.  Coding Practices and Iterativity: Beyond Templates for Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.

[29]  Sufficiency Thinking , 2020 .

[30]  Carole Howorth,et al.  Family Business , 2020 .

[31]  Hee‐Chan Song Sufficiency economy philosophy: Buddhism‐based sustainability framework in Thailand , 2020 .

[32]  A. A. Gümüsay The Potential for Plurality and Prevalence of the Religious Institutional Logic , 2020 .

[33]  Allan Discua Cruz There is no need to shout to be heard! The paradoxical nature of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in a Latin American family small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) , 2020 .

[34]  Y. Sidani,et al.  How Religion Shapes Family Business Ethical Behaviors: An Institutional Logics Perspective , 2020 .

[35]  J. Waal,et al.  Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory , 2020 .

[36]  Dominik van Aaken,et al.  Religion and CSR: a systematic literature review , 2020, Journal of Business Economics.

[37]  J. Astrachan,et al.  Values, Spirituality and Religion: Family Business and the Roots of Sustainable Ethical Behavior , 2020, Journal of Business Ethics.

[38]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Entrepreneurship and well-being: Past, present, and future , 2019, Journal of Business Venturing.

[39]  M. Vu Tensions and Struggles in Tackling Bribery at the Firm Level: Perspectives from Buddhist-Enacted Organizational Leaders , 2019, Journal of Business Ethics.

[40]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  Value drivers of social businesses: A business model perspective , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[41]  E. Tomalin,et al.  Religion and the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, The Review of Faith & International Affairs.

[42]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work , 2019 .

[43]  L. Zolotoy,et al.  Local Religious Norms, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Firm Value , 2019, Journal of Banking & Finance.

[44]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  SME Managers’ Perceptions of Competitive Pressure and the Adoption of Environmental Practices in Fragmented Industries: A Multi-Country Study in the Wine Industry , 2018, Organization & Environment.

[45]  L. Spence,et al.  Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Multilevel Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda , 2018 .

[46]  Sean P O'connell,et al.  Fostering the Growth of the Social Impact Business sector in Viet Nam , 2018 .

[47]  M. McAdam,et al.  Navigation of the paradoxical landscape of the family business , 2018 .

[48]  S. Kelly,et al.  Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Vietnam: a conceptual framework , 2018 .

[49]  Charlotte M. Karam,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study , 2018 .

[50]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research , 2017 .

[51]  Isabelle Le Breton-Miller,et al.  Institutional logics, family firm governance and performance , 2017 .

[52]  Judith L. Walls,et al.  The Power of One to Make a Difference: How Informal and Formal CEO Power Affect Environmental Sustainability , 2017 .

[53]  Zhao Zhou,et al.  Buddhist entrepreneurs and new venture performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial risk-taking , 2017 .

[54]  Txomin Iturralde,et al.  An exploratory study of firm goals in the context of family firms: An institutional logics perspective , 2017 .

[55]  C. Rebolledo,et al.  Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: Family versus nonfamily firms , 2017 .

[56]  D. Brown,et al.  Greening the black box: integrating the environment and management control systems , 2017 .

[57]  R. Basco “Where Do you Want to Take Your Family Firm?” A Theoretical and Empirical Exploratory Study of Family Business Goals , 2017 .

[58]  Graciela Metternicht,et al.  National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools , 2016 .

[59]  Trish Reay,et al.  Qualitatively capturing institutional logics , 2016 .

[60]  Issam Laguir,et al.  Are Family Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Enterprises More Socially Responsible Than Nonfamily Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Enterprises? , 2016 .

[61]  Sun Young Lee How can companies succeed in forming CSR reputation , 2016 .

[62]  Yong Wang Environmental dynamism, trust and dynamic capabilities of family businesses , 2016 .

[63]  Andrew Henley Does religion influence entrepreneurial behaviour? , 2016 .

[64]  Sabine B. Rau,et al.  To Be or Not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in Succession , 2016 .

[65]  G. Avery,et al.  Sufficiency Thinking: Thailand's Gift to an Unsustainable World , 2016 .

[66]  Sriya Iyer,et al.  The New Economics of Religion , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[67]  Daniel T. Holt,et al.  Viewing Family Firm Behavior and Governance Through the Lens of Agency and Stewardship Theories , 2016 .

[68]  G. George,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions Thematic Issue on Corporate Social Responsibility , 2016 .

[69]  S. O’Hogain,et al.  Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) , 2020, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[70]  Xing-qiang Du,et al.  Does Religion Mitigate Earnings Management? Evidence from China , 2015 .

[71]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective , 2015 .

[72]  Natalie Slawinski,et al.  Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[73]  T. Reay,et al.  How Family, Business, and Community Logics Shape Family Firm Behavior and “Rules of the Game” in an Organizational Field , 2015 .

[74]  M. Jones,et al.  The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach , 2015 .

[75]  Bjørn-Tore Blindheim,et al.  Institutional Models of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2015 .

[76]  Mike Wright,et al.  Family Enterprise and Context , 2014 .

[77]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications , 2014 .

[78]  M. Kaptein,et al.  Religiosity, CSR Attitudes, and CSR Behavior: An Empirical Study of Executives’ Religiosity and CSR , 2014 .

[79]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  The Influence of Institutional Logics on Corporate Responsibility Toward Employees , 2014 .

[80]  L. Fry,et al.  Spirituality and religion in the workplace: History, theory, and research. , 2014 .

[81]  Giovanna Campopiano,et al.  Firm Philanthropy in Small and Mediun-Sized Family Firms: The Effects of Family Involvement in Ownership and Management , 2014 .

[82]  LaKami T. Baker,et al.  Religiosity and spirituality in entrepreneurship: a review and research agenda , 2014 .

[83]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Religious institutions and entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[84]  A. Carsrud,et al.  The Impact of Cultural Openness, Religion, and Nationalism on Entrepreneurial Intensity: Six Prototypical Cases of Turkish Family Firms , 2014 .

[85]  P. Bansal,et al.  Business sustainability: It is about time , 2014 .

[86]  D. Jamali,et al.  Does religiosity determine affinities to CSR? , 2013 .

[87]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2012 .

[88]  Keith H. Brigham,et al.  Long–Term Orientation and Intertemporal Choice in Family Firms , 2011 .

[89]  D. De Clercq,et al.  Sustainability in entrepreneurship: A tale of two logics , 2011 .

[90]  Nancy E. Day,et al.  US small company leaders' religious motivation and other‐directed organizational values , 2011 .

[91]  Trish Reay,et al.  Constellations of Institutional Logics , 2011 .

[92]  Ian A. Harwood,et al.  The effects of procurement policies on ‘downstream’ corporate social responsibility activity , 2011 .

[93]  G. Haynes,et al.  Socially Responsible Processes of Small Family Business Owners: Exploratory Evidence from the National Family Business Survey , 2010 .

[94]  P. Westhead,et al.  Family firm diversity and development: An introduction , 2010 .

[95]  Matthew C. H. Yeung,et al.  Consumer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Religion and Values , 2010 .

[96]  Stan Xiao Li,et al.  The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[97]  A. Carroll,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice , 2010 .

[98]  G. Noci,et al.  Sustainability Report in Small Enterprises:Case Studies in Italian Furniture Companies , 2009 .

[99]  Dave Valliere Exploring Buddhist influence on the entrepreneurial decision , 2008 .

[100]  Hisham Abu Raiya,et al.  A DECADE OF RESEARCH ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION AND COPING: Things we assumed and lessons we learned , 2007, Psyke & Logos.

[101]  K. Pargament,et al.  A DECADE OF RESEARCH ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION AND COPING: Things we assumed and lessons we learned , 2007 .

[102]  M. Mccuddy,et al.  Spirituality, stewardship, and financial decision-making: Toward a theory of intertemporal stewardship , 2007 .

[103]  Eran Feitelson,et al.  Factors Affecting Environmental Behavior in Micro-enterprises , 2007 .

[104]  P. Daniels Buddhism and the transformation to sustainable economies , 2007 .

[105]  Toshi H. Arimura,et al.  Is a Voluntary Approach an Effective Environmental Policy Instrument? A Case for Environmental Management Systems , 2007 .

[106]  G. Midgley,et al.  Toward a Buddhist Systems Methodology 1: Comparisons between Buddhism and Systems Theory , 2007 .

[107]  Mário Fernando,et al.  The influence of religion-based workplace spirituality on business leaders' decision-making: An inter-faith study , 2006, Journal of Management & Organization.

[108]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[109]  Stephen Brammer,et al.  Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample , 2005 .

[110]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  Entrepreneurial Values and the Ethnic Enterprise: An Examination of Six Subcultures , 2005 .

[111]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Getting Right with Nature , 2005 .

[112]  Gretchen Helmke,et al.  Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[113]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Limits to growth : the 30-year update , 2004 .

[114]  Patricia H. Thornton Markets from Culture , 2004 .

[115]  Patricia H. Thornton Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing , 2004 .

[116]  J. Knight,et al.  Trust, Institutions, and Institutional Change: Industrial Districts and the Social Capital Hypothesis , 2003 .

[117]  Patricia H. Thornton Personal Versus Market Logics of Control: A Historically Contingent Theory of the Risk of Acquisition , 2001 .

[118]  S. Dodd,et al.  Religion and Enterprise: An Introductory Exploration , 1998 .

[119]  Tulku Thondup Masters of Meditation and Miracles: The Longchen Nyingthig Lineage of Tibetan Buddhism , 1996 .

[120]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Culture, gender, and self: a perspective from individualism-collectivism research. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[121]  S. Zadek The Practice of Buddhist Economics?.: Another View , 1993 .

[122]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[123]  Roberta Discetti,et al.  SMEs engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals: A power perspective , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[124]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Signaling stewardship and the value of family in a brand heritage Identity: A cross-cultural study of wineries , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[125]  D. Gasper,et al.  Conclusion: The Sustainable Development Goals and Capability and Human Security Analysis , 2020 .

[126]  M. Wagner,et al.  Sustainability and Environmental Behaviour in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Environment‐Related Activities, Innovation and Performance , 2018 .

[127]  Philip B. Whyman,et al.  SMEs and Certified Management Standards: The Effect of Motives and Timing on Implementation and Commitment , 2016 .

[128]  Matthias Abend What The Buddha Taught , 2016 .

[129]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Drivers of Community Strength: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Geographical and Affiliation Based Communities , 2016 .

[130]  Sandra Gutiérrez Olvera,et al.  Entrepreneurship in family businesses , 2015 .

[131]  Lotte Thomsen Business-State Relations in the Differentiated Private Sector in Vietnam: Access to Capital and Land , 2011 .

[132]  Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen,et al.  Modelling CSR: How Managers Understand the Responsibilities of Business Towards Society , 2010 .

[133]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics , 2008 .

[134]  M. Cowling,et al.  The Scale and Nature of Family Business , 2002 .

[135]  S. Darlington The Ordination of a Tree: The Buddhist Ecology Movement in Thailand , 1998 .

[136]  Karen Locke,et al.  Composing Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[137]  nd cent. Nāgārjuna,et al.  The fundamental wisdom of the middle way : Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā , 1995 .

[138]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[139]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .