Edge Vibration Improves Ability to Discriminate Roughness Difference of Adjoining Areas

Researchers have studied the discrimination thresholds between different vibrotactile signals under various conditions. Humans cannot recognize slight differences in vibrotactile stimuli that are smaller than the perception threshold. This is a constraint in the vibrotactile design used in practical applications. This article focuses on the vibrational feedback at the “edge” between multiple areas, while previous studies have not considered this. We assume that the edge vibration not only emphasizes the presence of the edge itself, but also has an effect on the vibrotactile perception of the adjoining areas. Specifically, we hypothesize that the edge vibration would modify the user's ability to discriminate vibrotactile differences between adjoining areas. We conducted a user study to test this hypothesis. As a result, we found that presenting edge vibrations at the boundaries between adjacent textures makes it easier to discriminate the frequency and amplitude differences of the vibrations of those uneven textures. This article could increase the flexibility of vibrotactile design, and vibrotactile designers could use these results to design a wider variety of vibrations for adjacent areas.

[1]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Haptics: The Present and Future of Artificial Touch Sensation , 2018, Annu. Rev. Control. Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Chris J. Dallmann,et al.  The role of vibration in tactile speed perception. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Griffin,et al.  Thresholds for the perception of hand-transmitted vibration: Dependence on contact area and contact location , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[4]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[5]  Seungmoon Choi,et al.  Vibrotactile Display: Perception, Technology, and Applications , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Backward and common-onset masking of vibrotactile stimuli , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[7]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  Tactile Masking by Electrovibration , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[8]  A. Landi Human Hand Function , 2007 .

[9]  Sang Ryong Kim,et al.  Vibrotactile rendering for simulating virtual environment in a mobile game , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[10]  Burak Güçlü,et al.  Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[12]  Charlotte M Reed,et al.  Temporal masking of multidimensional tactual stimuli. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Kwon,et al.  Mechanical Vibration Influences the Perception of Electrovibration , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Application of Psychophysical Techniques to Haptic Research , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[15]  Vivian O'Brien,et al.  Contour Perception, Illusion and Reality* , 1958 .

[16]  H. Tan,et al.  Frequency and amplitude discrimination along the kinestheticcutaneous continuum in the presence of masking stimuli. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Joseph M. Romano,et al.  Creating Realistic Virtual Textures from Contact Acceleration Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[18]  Yuki Ban,et al.  Vibrotactile Signal Generation from Texture Images or Attributes Using Generative Adversarial Network , 2018, EuroHaptics.

[19]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  Effect of Waveform on Tactile Perception by Electrovibration Displayed on Touch Screens , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[20]  Jaehoon Jung,et al.  Psychophysical Model for Vibrotactile Rendering in Mobile Devices , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[21]  N. Prins Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .

[22]  David A. Freedman,et al.  The Nature of Psychology. , 1966 .