Reliability and validity of the Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to validate the Turkish Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (T-NOSE) scale. Materials and methods: The NOSE scale was translated into Turkish. A prospective study was conducted involving adult subjects with nasal obstruction and a control group. The patients were divided into three groups, namely nasal septum deviation (NSD), septoplasty, and control groups. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the magnitude of the effect of surgery were all investigated. Results: In total, 253 subjects were enrolled in the study. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.938 and 0.942 upon test and retest, respectively, which proved good internal consistency. The mean kappa value was 0.82, indicating a high level of reproducibility. The difference between postoperative and control groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). The T-NOSE score of the NSD group was 65.67 ± 16.77, while it was 10.75 ± 12.25 for the control group (P < 0.01). The mean score improved following septoplasty (P < 0.001). The magnitude of the effect of surgery was considered high. The correlation between the visual analogue scale and NOSE scores was 0.948. Conclusion: The T-NOSE scale is a valid instrument with good internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness.

[1]  C. Skoulakis,et al.  Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale for Greek Patients , 2014, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  J. Kimbell,et al.  A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients. , 2014, JAMA facial plastic surgery.

[3]  A. Schindler,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale , 2013, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[4]  S. Vaitkus,et al.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 for Lithuanian patients , 2013, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[5]  Richard Louis Voegels,et al.  Quality of life assessment septoplasty in patients with nasal obstruction , 2012, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[6]  H. Goossens,et al.  EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. , 2012, Rhinology.

[7]  M. Stewart,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire. , 2011, Rhinology.

[8]  L. de Gabory,et al.  French Validation of the NOSE and RhinoQOL Questionnaires in the Management of Nasal Obstruction , 2011, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  T. Martinussen,et al.  The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 validated for Danish patients. , 2011, Danish medical bulletin.

[10]  P. Lefebvre,et al.  Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry in rhinoplasty. , 2010, B-ENT.

[11]  Michael G. Stewart,et al.  Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale1 , 2004, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  R. Carter The economics of health and disease. , 1971, WHO chronicle.