Using a virtual breakthrough series collaborative to improve access in primary care.

BACKGROUND The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) pioneered the Breakthrough Series (BTS), a short-term improvement project that convenes, in three face-to-face meetings, hospital or clinic teams to make rapid, significant improvement. A distance-learning (virtual) version of the BTS-a VBTS-was conducted. METHODS A model VBTS was tested with 20 organizations, using a well-established topic: improving access and efficiency in primary care. This VBTS took place by Internet and telephone, using Web-based collaboration software and audioconferencing. RESULTS For the 17 organizations completing the VBTS, the average number of days to third-next-available appointment fell from 23 to 10 days (July 2004-June 2005). The Improvement Assessment Scale showed 59% of teams at level 4 or above ("significant" improvement, with most changes implemented, and evidence of sustained improvement in outcomes and plans for spread). Potential direct cost savings were about $12,000 as compared with a traditional collaborative. Six months after the VBTS's conclusion, 70% of the teams that achieved significant improvement either maintained gains or improved their results. DISCUSSION Outcomes in a VBTS are potentially comparable to those in a traditional collaborative, at substantially lower cost. Prerequisites for success include senior leadership's involvement, team members' ability to participate, and information technology support.

[1]  Paul E. Plsek,et al.  Collaborative Quality Improvement for Neonatal Intensive Care , 2001 .

[2]  William B Weeks,et al.  Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[3]  D. Berwick,et al.  Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. , 2003, JAMA.

[4]  Steven R. Aragon.  Facilitating learning in online environments , 2003 .

[5]  P B Batalden,et al.  Using an improvement model to reduce adverse drug events in VA facilities. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[6]  P. Plsek,et al.  Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  T. Louis,et al.  Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Collaborative in Asthma Care: Does it Improve Processes and Outcomes of Care? , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[8]  J. Cross.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace , 2004 .

[9]  J D Horbar,et al.  Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. NIC/Q Project Investigators of the Vermont Oxford Network. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[10]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1999 .

[11]  D M Berwick,et al.  Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a "breakthrough series" collaborative. , 1998, Birth.

[12]  S Cretin,et al.  Quality collaboratives: lessons from research , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[13]  Shan Cretin,et al.  An Evaluation of Collaborative Interventions to Improve Chronic Illness Care , 2004, Evaluation review.

[14]  Brian S Mittman,et al.  Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Paul D Cleary,et al.  Effects of a Quality Improvement Collaborative on the Outcome of Care of Patients with HIV Infection: The EQHIV Study , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  E. Patterson.  Reducing Cesarean Section Rates Safely: Lessons from a "Breakthrough Series" , 1999 .