On the retrofitting and repowering of coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture: An advanced integration option with a gas turbine windbox

Retrofitting a significant fraction of existing coal-fired power plants is likely to be an important part of a global rollout of carbon capture and storage. For plants suited for a retrofit, the energy penalty for post-combustion carbon capture can be minimised by effective integration of the capture system with the power cycle. Previous work on effective integration options has typically been focused on either steam extraction from the power cycle with a reduction of the site power output, or the supply of heat and electricity to the capture system via the combustion of natural gas, with little consideration for the associated carbon emissions. This article proposes an advanced integration concept between the gas turbine, the existing coal plant and post-combustion capture processes with capture of carbon emissions from both fuels. The exhaust gas of the gas turbine enters the existing coal boiler via the windbox for sequential combustion to allow capture in a single dedicated capture plant, with a lower flow rate and a higher CO2 concentration of the resulting flue gas. With effective integration of the heat recovery steam generator with the boiler, the existing steam cycle and the carbon capture process, the reference subcritical unit used in this study can be repowered with an electricity output penalty of 295 kWh/tCO2 – 5% lower than a conventional steam extraction retrofit of the same unit – and marginal thermal efficiency of natural gas combustion of 50% LHV – 5% point higher than in a configuration where the gas turbine has a dedicated capture unit.

[1]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion , 2003 .

[2]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Validation of mass transfer correlations for CO2 absorption with MEA using pilot data , 2013 .

[3]  Gerald N. Choi,et al.  A Summary of EPRI's Engineering and Economic Studies of Post Combustion Capture Retrofit Applied at Various North American Host Sites , 2013 .

[4]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Managing capture technology uncertainty in capture-ready gas power plants , 2012 .

[5]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Maximising the effectiveness of post combustion CO2 capture systems , 2005 .

[6]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants , 2011 .

[7]  Lora L Pinkerton,et al.  Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1a: Bituminous Coal (PC) and Natural Gas to Electricity Revision 3 , 2011 .

[8]  Raymond Viskanta,et al.  Heat transfer in steam boiler furnaces , 1988 .

[9]  Kefa Cen,et al.  Boilers and burners : design and theory , 1999 .

[10]  Luis M. Romeo,et al.  Integration of power plant and amine scrubbing to reduce CO2 capture costs , 2008 .

[11]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Thermodynamic assessment of amine based CO2 capture technologies in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology , 2014 .

[12]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Steam cycle options for the retrofit of coal and gas power plants with postcombustion capture , 2011 .

[13]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Effective retrofitting of post-combustion CO2 capture to coal-fired power plants and insensitivity of CO2 abatement costs to base plant efficiency , 2011 .

[14]  G. H. Babcock,et al.  Steam / its generation and use , 1972 .