The MOEWAT as a proposed method of evaluating orbital exenteration wounds.

Orbital exenteration is a disfiguring and life-changing surgical procedure that involves the removal of the socket contents, including the eye, surrounding adnexa and, in some cases, the eyelids, orbital bone and sinuses. Wound healing of exenterated sockets can be complex and may take several months to completely heal. In an attempt to provide a framework for continuity of care for patients who undergo orbital exenteration surgery, we propose a socket wound assessment tool, which will allow professionals to track changes in orbital exenteration wounds. The Manchester Orbital Exenteration Wound Assessment tool (MOEWAT) has been developed to facilitate assessment and evaluation of postoperative exenterated sockets at any given time. Consequently, as the first assessment instrument specifically developed for use in orbital exenterated patients, the MOEWAT could provide a basis for wound-care decision-making in relation to clinical findings.

[1]  A. Barbul,et al.  Nutrition and Wound Healing: An Update , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  A. R. Sherman,et al.  Nutrition and wound healing. , 2006, Journal of wound care.

[3]  M. G. Woodbury,et al.  A prospective, multicenter study to validate use of the PUSH in patients with diabetic, venous, and pressure ulcers. , 2010, Ostomy/wound management.

[4]  J. Cooper Wound management following orbital exenteration surgery. , 2009, British journal of nursing.

[5]  E. A. Nelson,et al.  A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  N. Pfeiffer,et al.  Maggot therapy following orbital exenteration , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  K. Lagan,et al.  Larval therapy in wound management: a review , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.

[8]  A. Tyers Orbital exenteration for invasive skin tumours , 2006, Eye.

[9]  B. Leatherbarrow,et al.  Orbital exenteration: a 13 year Manchester experience , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Barillo,et al.  Wound bed preparation and a brief history of TIME , 2004, International wound journal.

[11]  K. Gündüz,et al.  Orbital exenteration: a review of 429 cases , 2004, International Ophthalmology.

[12]  M. Maylor Problems identified in gaining non-expert consensus for a hypothetical Wound Assessment Form. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.

[13]  A. Coombes,et al.  Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) dressing for skin graft application following exenteration of the orbit , 2003, Orbit.

[14]  H. Demirci,et al.  Experience With Eyelid-Sparing Orbital Exenteration: The 2000 Tullos O. Coston Lecture , 2001, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome--nutrition issues for patients. , 2001, Nutrition.

[16]  L. Russell The importance of wound documentation and classification. , 1999, British journal of nursing.

[17]  S. Evers,et al.  Cluster Headache after Orbital Exenteration , 1997, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[18]  M. Robson,et al.  Wound Infection: A Failure of Wound Healing Caused by an Imbalance of Bacteria , 1997 .

[19]  D. Thomas Pressure ulcer scale for healing, Derivation and varidation of the PUSH tool , 1997 .

[20]  D. Thomas Nutritional factors affecting wound healing. , 1996, Ostomy/wound management.

[21]  B. Ferrell,et al.  The Sessing Scale for Assessment of Pressure Ulcer Healing , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.