Design and Evaluation of the iMed Intelligent Medical Search Engine

Searching for medical information on the Web is popular and important. However, medical search has its own unique requirements that are poorly handled by existing medical Web search engines. This paper presents iMed, the first intelligent medical Web search engine that extensively uses medical knowledge and questionnaire to facilitate ordinary Internet users to search for medical information. iMed introduces and extends expert system technology into the search engine domain. It uses several key techniques to improve its usability and search result quality. First, since ordinary users often cannot clearly describe their situations due to lack of medical background, iMed uses a questionnaire-based query interface to guide searchers to provide the most important information about their situations. Second, iMed uses medical knowledge to automatically form multiple queries from a searcher' answers to the questions. Using these queries to perform search can significantly improve the quality of search results. Third, iMed structures all the search results into a multi-level hierarchy with explicitly marked medical meanings to facilitate searchers' viewing. Lastly, iMed suggests diversified, related medical phrases at each level of the search result hierarchy. These medical phrases are extracted from the MeSH ontology and can help searchers quickly digest search results and refine their inputs. We evaluated iMed under a wide range of medical scenarios. The results show that iMed is effective and efficient for medical search.

[1]  Justin Zobel,et al.  Passage retrieval revisited , 1997, SIGIR '97.

[3]  Chunqiang Tang,et al.  Challenging issues in iterative intelligent medical search , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Xiaoli Li,et al.  Eliminating noisy information in Web pages for data mining , 2003, KDD '03.

[5]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  Karen Sparck Jones,et al.  Okapi at TREC{7: automatic ad hoc, ltering, VLC and interactive track , 1999 .

[7]  Qing Zeng-Treitler,et al.  Research Paper: Assisting Consumer Health Information Retrieval with Query Recommendations , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Jade Goldstein-Stewart,et al.  The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[9]  S. M. Watkins,et al.  Common Medical Diagnoses: An Algorithmic Approach , 1990 .

[10]  Anthony S. Fauci,et al.  HARRISON'S PRINCIPLES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 13TH EDITION: , 2004 .

[11]  Mehran Sahami,et al.  A web-based kernel function for measuring the similarity of short text snippets , 2006, WWW '06.

[12]  Filip Radlinski,et al.  Improving personalized web search using result diversification , 2006, SIGIR.

[13]  Anthony L. Komaroff The Harvard Medical School family health guide , 1999 .

[14]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Okapi at TREC-7: Automatic Ad Hoc, Filtering, VLC and Interactive , 1998, TREC.

[15]  Qing Zeng-Treitler,et al.  Exploring and developing consumer health vocabularies. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[16]  D. Goldmann,et al.  American College of Physicians complete home medical guide , 1999 .

[17]  Hao Yang,et al.  MedSearch: a specialized search engine for medical information retrieval , 2008, CIKM '08.

[18]  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan,et al.  A novel diagnostic aid (ISABEL): development and preliminary evaluation of clinical performance , 2004, MedInfo.

[19]  P. Bickel,et al.  Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics , 1977 .

[20]  Gang Luo Intelligent Output Interface for Intelligent Medical Search Engine , 2008, AAAI.

[21]  Joseph Williams When expert systems are wrong , 1990, SIGBDP '90.

[22]  Chunqiang Tang,et al.  On iterative intelligent medical search , 2008, SIGIR '08.