A simple non-parametric method for eliciting prospect theory's value function and measuring loss aversion under risk and ambiguity

Prospect theory emerged as one of the leading descriptive decision theories that can rationalize a large body of behavioral regularities. The methods for eliciting prospect theory parameters, such as its value function and probability weighting, are invaluable tools in decision analysis. This paper presents a new simple method for eliciting prospect theory’s value function without any auxiliary/simplifying parametric assumptions. The method is applicable both to choice under ambiguity (Knightian uncertainty) and risk (when events are characterized by objective probabilities). Our new elicitation method is implemented in a simple paper-and-pencil experiment (via an iterative multiple price list format). This is one of the first experiments that elicits non-parametric prospect theory’s value function with salient rewards. The collected data generally confirm findings in the existing literature: the value function is S-shaped (concave in the gain domain and convex in the loss domain) though there is a weaker loss aversion on the aggregate level and a substantial heterogeneity in loss aversion on the individual level (41% loss averse, 6% loss neutral and 53% gain seeking).

[1]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[2]  M. Yaari The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk , 1987 .

[3]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory , 1993 .

[5]  Pavlo R. Blavatskyy,et al.  Modifying the Mean-Variance Approach to Avoid Violations of Stochastic Dominance , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[6]  G. Loomes,et al.  Imprecision as an account of violations of independence and betweenness , 2011 .

[7]  John Quiggin,et al.  Risk Perception And The Analysis Of Risk Attitudes , 1981 .

[8]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[9]  J. L. Pinto,et al.  A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis , 2000 .

[10]  M. Abdellaoui Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions , 2000 .

[11]  Mohammed Abdellaoui,et al.  Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[13]  D. Bernoulli Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[14]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[15]  Ale Smidts,et al.  The Shape of Utility Functions and Organizational Behavior , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  An index of loss aversion , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[18]  Pavlo R. Blavatskyy,et al.  Error Propagation in the Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions , 2006 .

[19]  Mohammed Abdellaoui,et al.  Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Faruk Gul A Theory of Disappointment Aversion , 1991 .

[21]  C. Starmer Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk , 2000 .

[22]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[24]  H. Bleichrodt,et al.  Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable , 2016 .

[25]  David Schmeidleis SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND EXPECTED UTILITY WITHOUT ADDITIVITY , 1989 .

[26]  D. Schmeidler Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity , 1989 .

[27]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[28]  Graham Loomes,et al.  Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 2007 .

[29]  Pavlo R. Blavatskyy Loss aversion , 2011 .

[30]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  APPLIED MATHEMATICS WORKING PAPER SERIES Risk, Ambiguity, and the Separation of Utility and Beliefs † , 2001 .

[31]  P. Wakker,et al.  Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown , 1996 .

[32]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes Toward Risk and Ambiguity , 2009, Manag. Sci..