A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise

Standard image processing techniques which are used to enhance noncoherent optically produced images are not applicable to radar images due to the coherent nature of the radar imaging process. A model for the radar imaging process is derived in this paper and a method for smoothing noisy radar images is also presented. The imaging model shows that the radar image is corrupted by multiplicative noise. The model leads to the functional form of an optimum (minimum MSE) filter for smoothing radar images. By using locally estimated parameter values the filter is made adaptive so that it provides minimum MSE estimates inside homogeneous areas of an image while preserving the edge structure. It is shown that the filter can be easily implemented in the spatial domain and is computationally efficient. The performance of the adaptive filter is compared (qualitatively and quantitatively) with several standard filters using real and simulated radar images.

[1]  Leonard J. Porcello,et al.  Speckle reduction in synthetic-aperture radars , 1976 .

[2]  Durga P. Panda Nonlinear smoothing of pictures , 1978 .

[3]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[4]  W. Brown Synthetic Aperture Radar , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  R. Harger Synthetic aperture radar systems , 1970 .

[6]  A A Sawchuk,et al.  Detection of low-contrast images in film-grain noise. , 1978, Applied optics.

[7]  Y Ichioka,et al.  Image restoration by Wiener filtering in the presence of signal-dependent noise. , 1977, Applied optics.

[8]  T. Bush,et al.  Fading Characteristics of Panchromatic Radar Backscatter from Selected Agricultural Targets , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[9]  A. Habibi Two-dimensional Bayesian estimate of images , 1972 .

[10]  I. Cumming,et al.  A Digital Processor for the Production of Seasat Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery , 1979 .

[11]  Julian Holtzman,et al.  Radar Image Simulation , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[12]  A. Oppenheim,et al.  Nonlinear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals , 1968 .

[13]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Jerry S. Zelenka,et al.  Comparison of continuous and discrete mixed-integrator processors , 1976 .

[15]  L. E. Franks,et al.  Signal theory , 1969 .

[16]  Ronald N. Bracewell,et al.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[17]  Zoltan S. Hegedus,et al.  Reduction of Speckle in Coherent Imaging by Spatial Frequency Sampling. II. Random spatial frequency sampling , 1974 .

[18]  G R DiCaprio,et al.  RADAR, IMAGE PROCESSING, AND INTERPRETER PERFORMANCE , 1976 .

[19]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[20]  W. A. Penn Signal Fidelity in Radar Processing , 1962, IRE Transactions on Military Electronics.

[21]  B. Frieden,et al.  Laser speckle and related phenomena , 1984, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[22]  John F. Walkup,et al.  Image Processing In Signal-Dependent Noise , 1974 .

[23]  I.E. Abdou,et al.  Quantitative design and evaluation of enhancement/thresholding edge detectors , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[24]  W A Pearlman A visual system model and a new distortion measure in the context of image processing. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  Richard Moore Tradeoff between Picture Element Dimensions and Noncoherent Averaging in Side-Looking Airborne Radar , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[26]  Zoltan S. Hegedus,et al.  Reduction of Speckle in Coherent Imaging by Spatial Frequency Sampling , 1974 .