Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation

Deep learning in in vitro fertilization is currently being evaluated in the development of assistive tools for the determination of transfer order and implantation potential using time-lapse data collected through expensive imaging hardware. Assistive tools and algorithms that can work with static images, however, can help in improving the access to care by enabling their use with images acquired from traditional microscopes that are available to virtually all fertility centers. Here, we evaluated the use of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN), trained using single timepoint images of embryos collected at 113 hr post-insemination, in embryo selection amongst 97 clinical patient cohorts (742 embryos) and observed an accuracy of 90% in choosing the highest quality embryo available. Furthermore, a CNN trained to assess an embryo’s implantation potential directly using a set of 97 euploid embryos capable of implantation outperformed 15 trained embryologists (75.26% vs. 67.35%, p<0.0001) from five different fertility centers.

[1]  Christos A. Venetis,et al.  Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study , 2017, Human reproduction.

[2]  Alice A. Chen,et al.  Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  Anja Pinborg,et al.  Weight reduction intervention for obese infertile women prior to IVF: a randomized controlled trial , 2017, Human reproduction.

[4]  Jan Holte,et al.  Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  James P Toner,et al.  Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  Development and evaluation of inexpensive automated deep learning-based imaging systems for embryology. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[7]  K. Tilleman,et al.  Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy , 2019, Facts, views & vision in ObGyn.

[8]  D. Tran,et al.  Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer , 2019, Human reproduction.

[9]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  Artificial intelligence-enabled system for embryo classification and selection based on image analysis , 2019, Fertility and Sterility.

[10]  C. Racowsky,et al.  National survey on use of time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories , 2017, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[11]  V. Gomel,et al.  The effect of embryo quality on subsequent pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  S. Davies,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Global Health , 2019, Ethics & International Affairs.

[13]  Stefan Germann,et al.  Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: how can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings? , 2018, BMJ Global Health.

[14]  José Celso Rocha,et al.  Descriptor : Automatized image processing of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro for quantitative variable determination , 2017 .

[15]  R. Lobo,et al.  Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. , 1990, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[17]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  An inexpensive, automated artificial intelligence (AI) system for human embryo morphology evaluation and transfer selection , 2019 .

[18]  Jacob F Mayer,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  Consistency and objectivity of automated embryo assessments using deep neural networks , 2020, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  K. Ivani,et al.  Morphology of the blastocysts is the single most important factor affecting clinical pregnancy rates in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfers , 2017 .

[21]  G A Hill,et al.  The influence of oocyte maturity and embryo quality on pregnancy rate in a program for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. , 1989, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  Catherine Wong,et al.  Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[23]  K. Drazba,et al.  A Qualitative Inquiry of the Financial Concerns of Couples Opting to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis to Prevent the Transmission of Known Genetic Disorders , 2014, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[24]  T. El-toukhy,et al.  The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[25]  Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli,et al.  'Cheaper than a newcomer': on the social production of IVF policy in Israel. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[26]  Catherine Racowsky,et al.  A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[27]  James P. Toner,et al.  Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years1 1Reprints are not available. , 2002 .

[28]  Alan S. Penzias,et al.  Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[29]  José Celso Rocha,et al.  A Method Based on Artificial Intelligence To Fully Automatize The Evaluation of Bovine Blastocyst Images , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Matthew Rabinowitz,et al.  Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[31]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  Deep learning mediated single time-point image-based prediction of embryo developmental outcome at the cleavage stage , 2020, ArXiv.

[32]  T. D’Hooghe,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos , 2009, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[33]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Blastocyst vs cleavage‐stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of reproductive outcomes , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[34]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  Deep learning-enabled blastocyst prediction system for cleavage stage embryo selection , 2019, Fertility and Sterility.

[35]  E. Santos Filho,et al.  A Review on Automatic Analysis of Human Embryo Microscope Images , 2010, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[36]  Ehsan Kazemi,et al.  Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization , 2019, npj Digital Medicine.

[37]  Ronit Machtinger,et al.  Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[38]  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy,et al.  Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks in classifying human embryo images based on their morphological quality , 2020, Heliyon.