When to Refrain from Using Likelihood Surface Methods for Geographic Offender Profiling: An Ex Ante Test of Assumptions

Likelihood surface methods for geographic offender profiling rely on several assumptions regarding the underlying location choice mechanism of an offender. We propose an ex ante test for checking whether a given set of crime locations is compatible with two necessary assumptions: circular symmetry and distance decay. The proposed (SDD) test compares the observed inter point distances of a given series of crimes with a theoretical distribution function governed by these assumptions, using a Monte Carlo simulation procedure for approximating that distribution function. We apply the SDD test to data on serial burglary from both the UK and the Netherlands. In most cases, the assumption of an underlying symmetric distance decay function has to be rejected. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  P. Brantingham,et al.  Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment , 1993 .

[2]  Brent Snook,et al.  Serial murderers' spatial decisions: factors that influence crime location choice , 2005 .

[3]  Spatial Characteristics of Serial Sexual Assault in New Zealand , 2006 .

[4]  Brent Snook,et al.  It’s no Riddle, Choose the Middle , 2007 .

[5]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  DISTANCE DECAY REEXAMINED , 1999 .

[6]  Michele Zito,et al.  On the Complexity and Accuracy of Geographic Profiling Strategies , 2005 .

[7]  Aiden Sidebottom,et al.  ALL OFFENDERS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS: VARIATION IN JOURNEYS TO CRIME BETWEEN OFFENDERS* , 2010 .

[8]  Michael Leitner,et al.  Evaluating the usefulness of functional distance measures when calibrating journey-to-crime distance decay functions , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[9]  Brent Snook,et al.  Predicting the home location of serial offenders: a preliminary comparison of the accuracy of human judges with a geographic profiling system. , 2002, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[10]  David V. Canter,et al.  Prioritizing Burglars: Comparing the Effectiveness of Geographical Profiling Methods , 2007 .

[11]  David V. Canter,et al.  The environmental range of serial rapists , 1993 .

[12]  Peter J. van Koppen,et al.  DESISTING DISTANCE DECAY: ON THE AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL CRIME TRIPS* , 1997 .

[13]  K. Harries,et al.  Issues in the Geographic Profiling of Crime: Review and Commentary , 2007 .

[14]  Derek Paulsen,et al.  Improving Geographic Profiling through Commuter/Marauder Prediction , 2007 .

[15]  David V. Canter,et al.  Predicting Serial Killers' Home Base Using a Decision Support System , 2000 .

[16]  Brent Snook,et al.  Geographic Profiling: The Fast, Frugal, and Accurate Way , 2004 .

[17]  W. Bernasco.  The usefulness of measuring spatial opportunity structures for tracking down offenders: A theoretical analysis of geographic offender profiling using simulation studies , 2007 .

[18]  Donna E. Youngs,et al.  Spatial patterns of Indian serial burglars with relevance to geographical profiling , 2006 .

[19]  W. Bernasco,et al.  How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas?: A New Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Location Choice , 2005 .

[20]  David V. Canter,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy of different decay functions in geographical profiling for a sample of US serial killers , 2006 .