Choosing Between Lecture and Briefing Sessions

The World Wide Web, online course material, electronic databases, and e-books present a unique challenge to traditionally approached curriculum delivery. With the Millennial student in mind teaching focus is no longer on how knowledge should be transferred, but how knowledge should be managed.

[1]  Nirusha Lachman,et al.  Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[2]  Aaron B. Rindflesch,et al.  Use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy course for enhancing professional behaviors in doctor of physical therapy students , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[4]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Anatomy teaching assistants: Facilitating teaching skills for medical students through apprenticeship and mentoring , 2013, Medical teacher.

[5]  D. Heylings,et al.  Anatomy 1999–2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how? , 2002, Medical education.

[6]  B. Turney,et al.  Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[7]  N. Vasan,et al.  Team‐based learning in anatomy: An efficient, effective, and economical strategy , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[8]  Alenoush Saroyan,et al.  Variations in lecturing styles , 1997 .

[9]  P. McGee,et al.  Demystifying the Millennial student: A reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[10]  N. Vasan,et al.  Modified use of team‐based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[11]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[12]  N. Borges,et al.  Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at One Medical School , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  S. Kotzé,et al.  The translucent cadaver: A follow‐up study to gauge the efficacy of implementing changes suggested by students , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Farewell, Lecture? , 2009, Science.

[15]  J. Twenge.  Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: teaching Generation Me , 2009, Medical education.

[16]  Justin E. Juskewitch,et al.  Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[17]  D. Jonas-Dwyer,et al.  The Millennial effect: Implications for academic development , 2004 .

[18]  Robert B Trelease,et al.  Transforming clinical imaging and 3D data for virtual reality learning objects: HTML5 and mobile devices implementation , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[19]  N. Vasan,et al.  A survey of student perceptions of team‐based learning in anatomy curriculum: Favorable views unrelated to grades , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[20]  K. Nanjundaiah,et al.  Body-painting: a tool which can be used to teach surface anatomy. , 2012, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[21]  Christopher L. Camp,et al.  Restructuring a basic science course for core competencies: An example from anatomy teaching , 2009, Medical teacher.

[22]  K. Mattick,et al.  From anatomical ‘competence’ to complex capability. The views and experiences of UK tutors on how we should teach anatomy to medical students , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.