Promise and problems in applying quantitative complementary areas for representing the diversity of some Neotropical plants (families Dichapetalaceae, Lecythidaceae, Caryocaraceae, Chrysobalanaceae and Proteaceae)

Priority areas forin situconservation are an unavoidable consequence of competition with other land uses, although they are certainly not to be seen as the only areas of value for conservation. In 1990 an international workshop was convened in Manaus, Brazil, to identify priority areas within Amazonia by committee (Workshop-90). A substantial part of the data for this assessment came from five plant families recorded for theFlora Neotropica. We compare the success of the Workshop-90 method in representing these plant species with the results of using a simple quantitative method for seeking complementary areas. The promises of quantitative methods are twofold. First, they force people to make their values explicit, which is important because priorities are dependent on the values and goals of individuals and are not universal. Second, quantitative methods can achieve representation of more of what is valued. For example, within the 90 top-priority areas (an arbitrary but convenient figure taken from Workshop-90), species representation is shown to be increased when using the complementary areas method by 83%. Simple computer implementations of this method can provide the means for fast inter-active exploration of flexibility in the many alternative area choices. This permits monitoring and review with minimum effort as new data on species and threats are acquired. On the other hand, the problem for all methods is the need for very large numbers of data, whether based on species or on any other surrogates for biodiversity, if well-informed decisions are to be made. This is not a particular problem of quantitative methods, but their explicit nature does highlight the shortcomings of data. For example, patterns in theFlora Neotropicadata show effects from small samples even though these data are among the best available for any large tropical wet-forest region. Furthermore, in order to assess the longer-term consequences of area choices, quantitative methods will require many explicit local data on factors affecting viability, threat and cost.

[1]  Les G. Underhill,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms , 1994 .

[2]  K. Redford,et al.  Rarity in Neotropical Forest Mammals and Its Ecological Correlates , 1990 .

[3]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Large scale patterns of biodiversity: spatial variation in family richness , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  J. Terborgh,et al.  A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Columbia and Ecuador , 1983 .

[5]  K. Gaston,et al.  Predicting the species richness of neotropical forest butterflies: Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators , 1995 .

[6]  M. Gadgil,et al.  Assigning conservation value: a case study from India , 1991 .

[7]  R L Pressey,et al.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  J. Butler,et al.  Nature Conservation in Uganda's Tropical Forest Reserves , 1991 .

[9]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Do Conservationists and Molecular Biologists Value Differences between Organisms in the Same Way , 1994 .

[10]  G. Prance Consensus for conservation , 1990, Nature.

[11]  Jamie B. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania , 1983 .

[12]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds , 1996 .

[13]  A. Gentry Speciation in tropical forests , 1989 .

[14]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  Accumulating knowledge on the dimensions of biodiversity: systematic perspectives on Neotropical mammals , 1994 .

[15]  N. Myers The Sinking Ark: A New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species , 1979 .

[16]  J. Mcneely,et al.  Biodiversity indicators for policy-makers , 1993 .

[17]  R. Vane‐Wright,et al.  Milkweed butterflies, their cladistics and biology, being an account of the natural history of the Danainae, a subfamily of the Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae. , 1984 .

[18]  B. Nelson,et al.  Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia , 1990, Nature.

[19]  K. S. Brown 14 – Conservation of Neotropical Environments: Insects as Indicators , 1991 .

[20]  Harry John Betteley Birks,et al.  How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway , 1993 .

[21]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[22]  Walter V. Reid,et al.  Conserving the World's Biological Diversity , 1990 .

[23]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[24]  N. Myers Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests , 1988, The Environmentalist.

[25]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? , 1994 .

[26]  John A. Endler,et al.  Speciation and Its Consequences , 1989 .

[27]  A. Gentry,et al.  Neotropical Floristic Diversity: Phytogeographical Connections Between Central and South America, Pleistocene Climatic Fluctuations, or an Accident of the Andean Orogeny? , 1982 .

[28]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots , 1993 .

[29]  R. Allen World conservation strategy. Living resource conservation for sustainable development. , 1980 .

[30]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.

[31]  H. Morowitz Balancing species preservation and economic considerations. , 1991, Science.

[32]  D P Faith,et al.  Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  A. Gentry,et al.  Tropical forest biodiversity : distributional patterns and their conservational significance , 1992 .

[34]  A. Gentry,et al.  Contribution of nontrees to species richness of a tropical rain forest , 1987 .

[35]  Carlos A. Peres,et al.  Amazonian Nature Reserves: An Analysis of the Defensibility Status of Existing Conservation Units and Design Criteria for the Future , 1994 .

[36]  Randall T Ryti,et al.  Effect of the Focal Taxon on the Selection of Nature Reserves. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Centres of seed-plant diversity: the family way , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Paul E. Smith,et al.  Autocorrelation in the logistic regression modelling of species distributions , 1994 .

[39]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[40]  N. M. Collins,et al.  Threatened swallowtail butterflies of the world. The IUCN red data book. , 1987 .

[41]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Nonrandom distribution of structural mutants in ethylnitrosourea-treated cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  B. Groombridge Global biodiversity: status of the earth's living resources. , 1992 .

[44]  M. Palmer,et al.  The Estimation of Species Richness by Extrapolation , 1990 .

[45]  New species of Panopsis (Proteaceae) from South America , 1993 .

[46]  Ghillean T. Prance,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of biodiversity in the neotropics , 1994 .

[47]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches , 1989 .

[48]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[49]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western New South Wales. , 1994 .

[50]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[51]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Apparent species turnover, probability of extinction and the selection of nature reserves A case study of the Ingleborough limestone pavements , 1994 .

[52]  M. Mares Neotropical Mammals and the Myth of Amazonian Biodiversity , 1992, Science.

[53]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring biodiversity taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities , 1991 .

[54]  N. Myers,et al.  The biodiversity challenge: Expanded hot-spots analysis , 1990, The Environmentalist.

[55]  C. Bibby,et al.  Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation , 1992 .

[56]  M. Usher,et al.  Wildlife Conservation Evaluation , 1986 .

[57]  John E. Estes,et al.  Species RichnessA geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity , 1987 .

[58]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[59]  A. Kluge A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes) , 1989 .

[60]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Rarity, species richness and conservation: Butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco , 1985 .

[61]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[62]  H. Possingham,et al.  The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation , 1993 .

[63]  D. Austin,et al.  Floristic Inventory of Tropical Countries. , 1990 .

[64]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[65]  A. Rebelo,et al.  Protection of Fynbos vegetation: ideal and real-world options , 1990 .

[66]  J. Grinnell The Role of the “Accidental” , 1922 .