Technology Transfer and Knowledge Utilization: A Review of Systems and Organizations Relevant to Wood Utilization Research and Product Development in the United States

The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access

[1]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[2]  Martin J Buxton,et al.  The utilisation of health research in policy-making : concepts , examples and methods of assessment , 2003 .

[3]  Michael Huberman,et al.  Research utilization: The state of the art , 1994 .

[4]  Ian Barclay,et al.  New Product Development From Past Research to Future Applications , 1998 .

[5]  C. Weiss The many meanings of research utilization. , 1979 .

[6]  Charles W Wessner,et al.  Steering Committee for Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies , 2001 .

[7]  Philip E. Auerswald,et al.  PLACING INNOVATION: AN APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING EMERGENT TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITY , 2008 .

[8]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Public versus Private Technological Incubator Programmes: Privatizing the Technological Incubators in Israel , 2008 .

[9]  Raymond R. Cosner Industrial Research Institute's R&D Trends Forecast for 2010 , 2010 .

[10]  Michael A. Kilgore,et al.  United States Wood-based Industry: A Review of Structure and Organization , 2010 .

[11]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Government as Entrepreneur , 2009 .

[12]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Réjean Landry,et al.  The Extent and Organizational Determinants of Research Utilization in Canadian Health Services Organizations , 2007 .

[14]  John Hardin,et al.  BARRIERS TO THE DIFFUSION OF NANOTECHNOLOGY , 2008 .

[15]  Robert Nasi,et al.  The interface of policy research and the policy development process: challenges posed to the forestry community , 2006 .

[16]  Uma Kumar,et al.  Determinants of Integrated Product Development Diffusion , 2006 .

[17]  John L. Innes,et al.  The incorporation of research into attempts to improve forest policy in British Columbia , 2003 .

[18]  Helen Lawton Smith Adjusting the roles of national laboratories: some comparisons between UK, French, and Belgian institutions , 1997 .

[19]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[20]  Paul V. Ellefson,et al.  Wood Utilization Research and Product Development Capacity in the United States: A Review , 2010 .

[21]  Robert F. Rich,et al.  Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes , 1997 .

[22]  N. Churchill,et al.  The Five Stages of Small Business Growth , 1983 .

[23]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies , 2002 .

[24]  Ruud T. Frambach,et al.  Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms , 2000 .

[25]  Réjean Landry,et al.  The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies , 2003 .

[26]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Screening Practices of New Business Incubators: The Evaluation of Critical Success Factors , 1988 .

[27]  D. Kaimowitz,et al.  The influence of research and publications on conventional wisdom and policies affecting forests. , 2000 .

[28]  J. Haygreen,et al.  Innovation and productivity change in the structural panel industry , 1985 .

[29]  Gordon M. Hickey,et al.  Government science in forestry: Characteristics and policy utilization , 2011 .

[30]  Paul Hannon,et al.  A conceptual development framework for management and leadership learning in the UK incubator sector , 2003 .

[31]  T. Williamson,et al.  Research, technology transfer, and education needs assessment for non-residential wood structures in California. , 2009 .

[32]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Importance of Angel Investing in Financing the Growth of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 2012 .

[33]  A. Berry,et al.  Unemployment and economic development. , 1984 .

[34]  S. Sedita,et al.  How Do Collaborations with Universities Affect Firms' Innovative Performance? The Role of "Pasteur Scientists" in the Advanced Materials Field , 2009 .

[35]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[36]  Michael A. Kilgore,et al.  Forest products research and development organizations in a worldwide setting : a review of structure, governance, and measures of performance. , 2006 .

[37]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice : an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings , 2011 .

[38]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Federal laboratories as research partners , 1999 .

[39]  D V R Seshadri,et al.  Toward a Grounded Theory of Effective Business Incubation , 2008 .

[40]  Paul V. Ellefson,et al.  Integrating science and policy development: case of the national research council and US national policy focused on non-federal forests , 2000 .

[41]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Cooperative research in U.S. manufacturing : assessing policy initiatives and corporate strategies , 1989 .

[42]  O. Gassmann,et al.  TOWARDS A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF CORPORATE INCUBATORS , 2006 .

[43]  Leslie D. Hall,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. , 2010 .

[44]  Jack H. Knott,et al.  If Dissemination Is the Solution, What Is the Problem ? , 1980 .