A New Graphical Tool for Assessing Visual Field Progression in Clinical Populations

Purpose We demonstrate a new approach for assessing and visualizing visual field (VF) progression in clinics. Methods Two summary measures for VF progression, Rate of Progression (RP) and Loss of Sight Years (LSY), are combined with a novel visualization (Hedgehog Plots). RP is calculated per eye using linear regression of mean deviation (MD) against time of follow-up. LSY is a novel parameter, linked to actuarial data, which estimates the number of years that a patient will have advanced bilateral VF loss in their predicted remaining lifetime. Every eye is given a rank within the sample based on RP and LSY allowing for “priority” patients to be identified. We illustrate differences between the parameters with an experiment comparing the cases flagged as “priority” by each method using data from 1263 VF records. Results RP for every eye in a “clinic” can be visualized and assessed using a Hedgehog Plot. Eyes are ranked against all other eyes by RP and LSY; these parameters provide different and complementary information on a patient's VF progression status. A purpose written interactive application demonstrating the techniques is available in the public domain at https://crabblab.shinyapps.io/hedgehog. Conclusion Hedgehog Plots provide a tool for visualizing VF progression in groups of patients and can be used potentially to prioritize monitoring resources. Translational Relevance This study illustrates a novel visualization technique and an interactive application that can be used to help determine VF progression in large groups of patients.

[1]  D. Friedman,et al.  Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  David P Crabb,et al.  Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data , 2015, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  Koenraad A Vermeer,et al.  Robust and censored modeling and prediction of progression in glaucomatous visual fields. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  An exploratory study of visual search performance in glaucoma , 2011, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  D. Melmoth,et al.  The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  D. Crabb,et al.  More frequent, more costly? Health economic modelling aspects of monitoring glaucoma patients in England , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[9]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Properties of the statpac visual field index. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Examining visual field loss in patients in glaucoma clinics during their predicted remaining lifetime. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Do patients with glaucoma have difficulty recognizing faces? , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  Michael V. Boland,et al.  The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Bron,et al.  Change in Visual Field Progression Following Treatment Escalation in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma , 2017, Journal of glaucoma.

[15]  David P. Crabb,et al.  Areas of the visual field important during reading in patients with glaucoma , 2015, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines , 2013, BMJ Open.

[17]  Daryl R. Tabrett,et al.  Important areas of the central binocular visual field for daily functioning in the visually impaired , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  Y. Aoyama,et al.  Identifying Areas of the Visual Field Important for Quality of Life in Patients with Glaucoma , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Rates of visual field progression in clinical glaucoma care , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[20]  A Heijl,et al.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Crabb,et al.  Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data , 2015, Eye.

[22]  R. A. Hitchings,et al.  Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma , 1995, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[23]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[24]  D P Crabb,et al.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  Lee Jones,et al.  ‘I didn't see that coming’: simulated visual fields and driving hazard perception test performance , 2016, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[26]  D. Crabb,et al.  Example of monitoring measurements in a virtual eye clinic using ‘big data’ , 2017, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[27]  Koenraad A Vermeer,et al.  Global Visit Effects in Point-Wise Longitudinal Modeling of Glaucomatous Visual Fields. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  Practical landmarks for visual field disability in glaucoma , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[29]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Frequency of visual field testing when monitoring patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma: mixed methods and modelling , 2014 .

[30]  A. Azuara-Blanco,et al.  Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[31]  G. Lindgren,et al.  The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.