A Two-Microphone Noise Reduction System for Cochlear Implant Users with Nearby Microphones—Part II: Performance Evaluation

Users of cochlear implants (auditory aids, which stimulate the auditory nerve electrically at the inner ear) often suffer from poor speech understanding in noise. We evaluate a small (intermicrophone distance 7 mm) and computationally inexpensive adaptive noise reduction system suitable for behind-the-ear cochlear implant speech processors. The system is evaluated in simulated and real, anechoic and reverberant environments. Results from simulations show improvements of 3.4 to 9.3 dB in signal to noise ratio for rooms with realistic reverberation and more than 18 dB under anechoic conditions. Speech understanding in noise is measured in 6 adult cochlear implant users in a reverberant room, showing average improvements of 7.9–9.6 dB, when compared to a single omnidirectional microphone or 1.3–5.6 dB, when compared to a simple directional two-microphone device. Subjective evaluation in a cafeteria at lunchtime shows a preference of the cochlear implant users for the evaluated device in terms of speech understanding and sound quality.

[1]  P. Peterson,et al.  Intelligibility-weighted measures of speech-to-interference ratio and speech system performance. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implantation and directional multi-microphone systems , 2004 .

[3]  H. Hildmann,et al.  Comparison of the TEMPO+ Ear-Level Speech Processor and the CIS PRO+ Body-Worn Processor in Adult MED-EL Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, ORL.

[4]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-Microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM™ in the Nucleus Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Steve Rogers,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1996 .

[6]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[7]  M Kompis,et al.  Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[9]  Martin Kompis A Measuring Medical Pocket Calculator , 2008 .

[10]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[11]  M Kompis,et al.  Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. I. Prediction of the signal-to-noise-ratio improvement. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Helen Brown,et al.  Applied Mixed Models in Medicine , 2000, Technometrics.

[13]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  Intra-and intersubject comparison of cochlear implant systems using the Esprit and the Tempo+ behind-the-ear speech processor: Comparacion intra e inter-personal de los sistemas de implante coclear utilizando los procesadores de lenguaje retroauriculares Esprit y Tempo+ , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[14]  Matthias Bertram,et al.  A Two-Microphone Noise Reduction System for Cochlear Implant Users with Nearby Microphones—Part I: Signal Processing Algorithm Design and Development , 2008, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[15]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Evaluation of a noise reduction system for the assessment of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Simulating transfer functions in a reverberant room including source directivity and head-shadow effects , 1993 .