You look pretty happy: Attractiveness moderates emotion perception.

A happy face advantage has consistently been shown in emotion categorization tasks; happy faces are categorized as happy faster than angry faces as angry. Furthermore, social category cues, such as facial sex and race, moderate the happy face advantage in evaluatively congruent ways with a larger happy face advantage for more positively evaluated faces. We investigated whether attractiveness, a facial attribute unrelated to more defined social categories, would moderate the happy face advantage consistent with the evaluative congruence account. A larger happy face advantage for the more positively evaluated attractive faces than for unattractive faces was predicted. Across 4 experiments participants categorized attractive and unattractive faces as happy or angry as quickly and accurately as possible. As predicted, when female faces were categorized separately, a happy face advantage emerged for the attractive females but not for the unattractive females. Corresponding results were only found in the error rates for male faces. This pattern was confirmed when female and male faces were categorized together, indicating that attractiveness may have a stronger influence on emotion perception for female faces. Attractiveness is shown to moderate emotion perception in line with the evaluative congruence account and is suggested to have a stronger influence on emotion perception than facial sex cues in contexts where attractiveness is a salient evaluative dimension. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  O. Lipp,et al.  The Influence of Facial Sex Cues on Emotional Expression Categorization is not Fixed , 2017, Emotion.

[2]  O. Lipp,et al.  Facial race and sex cues have a comparable influence on emotion recognition in Chinese and Australian participants , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[3]  T. K. Srull,et al.  A Dual process model of impression formation , 1988 .

[4]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[5]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties , 2017, British journal of psychology.

[6]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[8]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[9]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Are Women Evaluated More Favorably Than Men?: An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Emotions , 1991 .

[10]  F. Mast,et al.  Something to smile about: The interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[11]  Joshua Correll,et al.  The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[12]  R. Adolphs.  Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[13]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Affect and face perception: odors modulate the recognition advantage of happy faces. , 2003, Emotion.

[14]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[15]  The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration. , 2012, Emotion.

[16]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic prejudice in childhood and early adolescence. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[19]  O. Lipp,et al.  The influence of multiple social categories on emotion perception , 2018 .

[20]  Alisdair J. G. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Facial Attractiveness on Facial Expression Identification , 2016 .

[21]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  ON WONDERFUL WOMEN AND SEEING SMILES: SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION MODERATES THE HAPPY FACE RESPONSE LATENCY ADVANTAGE , 2006 .

[22]  K. Hugenberg.  Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces. , 2005, Emotion.

[23]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  D. Maestripieri,et al.  Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  E. Ashby Plant,et al.  The Influence of Gender and Social Role on the Interpretation of Facial Expressions , 2004 .

[26]  O. Lipp,et al.  A Happy Face Advantage With Male Caucasian Faces , 2015 .

[27]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why? , 2004, Psychological research.

[28]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Categorising intersectional targets: An “either/and” approach to race- and gender-emotion congruity , 2017, Cognition & emotion.

[29]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[30]  Sophie L Cronin,et al.  Stimulus set size modulates the sex–emotion interaction in face categorization , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Tamas Bereczkei,et al.  Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality , 2004, Human nature.

[32]  A. Chasteen,et al.  Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice , 2009 .

[33]  Gijsbert Bijlstra,et al.  The social face of emotion recognition: Evaluations versus stereotypes , 2010 .

[34]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  The influence of social category cues on the happy categorisation advantage depends on expression valence , 2017, Cognition & emotion.

[36]  S. Sussman,et al.  You're Only as Pretty as You Feel: Facial Expression as a Determinant of Physical Attractiveness , 1984 .