Carative Factors in the Design Development Process: Towards Understanding Owner–Object Detachment and Promoting Object Longevity

Abstract Designing for object detachment offers potential for extending an object’s lifespan and reducing environmental impact. The philosophy and theory of care-giving in nursing practice may be usefully adapted and applied to the care of possessions. Care-giving behaviour towards objects includes maintaining and repairing them, but also letting them go gracefully, and has potential implications for sustainable design. Little research has explored applying the concept of ‘carative factors’ (love and charity, and the motive of all caring) to the design process. This study introduces a toolkit based on four motive caring factors and influential factors, and reports on an exploratory workshop, in which participants use the toolkit to generate design concepts. The results suggest that the concept of carative factors has value in the design processes for extending the lifespan of objects, and the toolkit provides better understanding for designers of ownership, disposal and reuse.

[1]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  Consumers' perspective on product care: An exploratory study of motivators, ability factors, and triggers , 2018 .

[2]  J. Pope,et al.  What's Mine is Yours , 2016, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[3]  T. Newholm,et al.  Care and Commitment in Ethical Consumption: An Exploration of the ‘Attitude–Behaviour Gap’ , 2016 .

[4]  Nicole van Nes,et al.  Understanding Replacement Behaviour and Exploring Design Solutions , 2016 .

[5]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[6]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy , 2015 .

[7]  Conny Bakker,et al.  A product design framework for a circular economy , 2015 .

[8]  Dominic King,et al.  Mindplace: influencing behaviour through public policy. , 2014 .

[9]  F. Gough,et al.  Encyclopedia of Bioethics , 2014 .

[10]  Daniel Lockton,et al.  Design with intent : a design pattern toolkit for environmental and social behaviour change , 2013 .

[11]  K. Niedderer.  Mindful Design as a Driver for Social Behaviour Change , 2013 .

[12]  Casper Boks,et al.  Using a guide to select design strategies for behaviour change; Theory vs. Practice , 2012 .

[13]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour , 2011 .

[14]  Juliet Michaelson,et al.  'Moments of Change' as opportunities for influencing behaviour , 2011 .

[15]  J. Peck,et al.  Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect , 2011 .

[16]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[17]  W. Stahel.  The Performance Economy , 2010 .

[18]  Tim Cooper,et al.  Consumer influences on product life-spans , 2010 .

[19]  Tang Tang,et al.  Towards sustainable use: design behaviour intervention to reduce household environment impact , 2010 .

[20]  S. Wright,et al.  Ethics Of Care , 2018 .

[21]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Design for (Emotional) Durability , 2009, Design Issues.

[22]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[23]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Designing with care , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[24]  David V. Keyson,et al.  Empirical research through design , 2009 .

[25]  K. Friedman.  Research into, by and for design , 2008 .

[26]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[27]  John B. Davis,et al.  The Individual in Mainstream Health Economics: A Case of Persona Non-grata , 2007, Health Care Analysis.

[28]  Jonathan Chapman.  Subject object relationships and emotionally durable design , 2007 .

[29]  Hernan Casakin,et al.  Metaphors in Design Problem Solving: Implications for Creativity , 2007 .

[30]  T. Love,et al.  Path-dependent Foundation of Global Design-driven Outdoor Trade in the Northwest of England , 2007 .

[31]  Stuart Walker,et al.  Sustainable by Design: Explorations in Theory and Practice. , 2006 .

[32]  T. Cooper.  Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society” , 2005 .

[33]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design , 2005 .

[34]  Pieter Desmet,et al.  Designing Products with Added Emotional Value: Development and Appllcation of an Approach for Research through Design , 2001 .

[35]  Celia Wolf-Devine,et al.  Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care , 1995 .

[36]  Rita C. Manning,et al.  Care and commitment : taking the personal point of view , 1993 .

[37]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[38]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[39]  J. Watson,et al.  Nursing: human science and human care. A theory of nursing. , 1988, NLN publications.

[40]  M. Miles,et al.  Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft , 1984 .

[41]  L. Engman.  On caring. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[42]  L. Harvey.  Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions , 1983 .

[43]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[44]  K. Lewin.  Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[45]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .