Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Guttman. Equal-reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal-sweetness values. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[2] M. Sidman,et al. Sucrose Concentration as Reinforcement for Lever Pressing by Monkeys , 1956 .
[3] G. N. Wilkinson. Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. , 1961, The Biochemical journal.
[4] H S HOFFMAN,et al. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[5] R. Herrnstein. On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6] A. Catania,et al. Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[7] R. Herrnstein,et al. Toward a law of response strength. , 1976 .
[8] Suppression of response rates in variable‐interval schedules by a concurrent schedule of reinforcement , 1977 .
[9] J. Hull. Instrumental response topographies of rats , 1977 .
[10] F. Mcsweeney,et al. Prediction of concurrent keypeck treadle-press responding from simple schedule performance , 1978 .
[11] C. Bradshaw,et al. Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: the effect of the concentration of sucrose reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[12] C. Bradshaw,et al. Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[13] G. Heyman. A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[14] J. J. McDowell,et al. Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[15] A. Hamilton,et al. Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: Validation and neuroleptics , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.
[16] A. Sclafani,et al. Sham-Feeding response of rats to polycose and sucrose , 1987, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[17] Gene M. Heyman,et al. Effects of Changes in Response Requirement and Deprivation on the Parameters of the Matching Law Equation: New Data and Review , 1987 .
[18] J. Porter,et al. Assessment of pimozide's motor and hedonic effects on operant behavior in rats , 1988, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.
[19] M. Davison,et al. The matching law: A research review. , 1988 .
[20] P. Kop. Reinforcement, choice and response strength , 1990 .
[21] R. Herrnstein. Rational Choice Theory Necessary but Not Sufficient , 1990 .
[22] J. Staddon. SELECTIVE CHOICE - A COMMENTARY ON HERRNSTEIN (1990) , 1991 .
[23] G. Heyman,et al. Effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on the parameters of the response-strength equation. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[24] G. Heyman,et al. Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.