An Experience Report on Update of Systematic Literature Reviews

Context: In order to preserve the value of Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs), they should be frequently updated including new studies produced after the conduction of the reviews. However, most of SLRs are outdated and there is a lack of works that support the conduction of SLRs updates. Objective: The main goal of this paper is to report our experience in updating two of our SLRs. Method: To update these two SLRs, we used automated techniques based on VTM (Visual Text Mining) to guarantee the presence of relevant studies. Results: From our experience, some factors to satisfactorily update SLRs were identified: (i) to adopt software tools to support the updating process; (ii) to provide as much as possible information of previous SLR; (iii) to involve researchers from previous SLR; and (iv) to reuse protocol from preliminar SLR. Conclusions: Reported lessons learned can be used as a basis of knowledge to guide researchers when updating their SLRs. Keywords—Systematic literature review, update, VTM

[1]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[2]  Lucas Bueno Ruas de Oliveira,et al.  Architectural design of service-oriented robotic systems , 2015 .

[3]  Apostolos Ampatzoglou,et al.  REFERENCE ARCHITECTURES AND REFERENCE MODELS FOR AMBIENT ASSISTED LIVING SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW , 2017 .

[4]  Stephen G. MacDonell,et al.  A visual analysis approach to update systematic reviews , 2014, EASE '14.

[5]  Muhammad Ali Babar,et al.  Identifying relevant studies in software engineering , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Haim Levkowitz,et al.  Least Square Projection: A Fast High-Precision Multidimensional Projection Technique and Its Application to Document Mapping , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Information Visualization and Visual Data Mining , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[8]  Danny Holten,et al.  Hierarchical Edge Bundles: Visualization of Adjacency Relations in Hierarchical Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Emilia Mendes,et al.  Using Visual Text Mining to Support the Study Selection Activity in Systematic Literature Reviews , 2011, 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[10]  Rob J. P. M. Scholten,et al.  Maintaining Reviews: Updates, Amendments and Feedback , 2008 .

[11]  N. Altman An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression , 1992 .

[12]  Manoel G. Mendonça,et al.  A Visual Text Mining approach for Systematic Reviews , 2007, First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007).

[13]  Rosane Minghim,et al.  A visual analysis approach to validate the selection review of primary studies in systematic reviews , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  Rosane Minghim,et al.  HiPP: A Novel Hierarchical Point Placement Strategy and its Application to the Exploration of Document Collections , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering , 2006, ICSE.