A Study of Behavioral Intention for Mobile Commerce Using Technology Acceptance Model

Davis’s Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) suggests that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness can predict user behavior and acceptance when using information technology. In this study we use it as a tool for evaluating the acceptance and usage for mobile commerce by employing data collected from 205 students selected proportionally from nine universities located at Taipei City. The results show that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness are the fundamental determinants of user acceptance and have positive impact. They demonstrate positive impacts on attitude to use and behavioral intention to use. In addition, the attitude toward using m-commerce has a partial mediating effect on behavioral intention to use. Behavioral intention to use exerts a positive, though lesser, impact on actual use of m-commerce.

[1]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[2]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[3]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  Mobile Commerce: Framework, Applications and Networking Support , 2002, Mob. Networks Appl..

[4]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[5]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources , 2001, DATB.

[7]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[8]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[9]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[13]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[14]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  Gender & information & communications technology-A 10-year study of new undergraduates , 2002 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.