Telenurses' experiences of working with computerized decision support: supporting, inhibiting and quality improving.

AIM This paper is a report of a study conducted to describe telenurses' experiences of working with computerized decision support systems and how such systems could influence their work. BACKGROUND Telenursing is an expanding service in many Western countries, and in recent years centralization of telenursing services has occurred in Sweden. In connection with this, the use of computerized decision support has increased. METHOD Eight Registered Nurses from three telephone advice call centres in Sweden who were using computerized decision support took part in semi-structured interviews in 2006. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS The findings are presented as one theme and three categories. Telenurses experienced their work with a decision support system as supporting, inhibiting and quality improving. Based on two of the categories - 'supporting' and 'inhibiting' - a theme was revealed: being strengthened, but simultaneously controlled and inhibited. This theme represents the individual level. The telenurses found that the decision support system simplified their work, complemented their knowledge, gave them security and enhanced their credibility. They also described experiencing the system as incomplete, sometimes in conflict with their own opinions and controlling. The third category referred to the organizational level: the decision support system ensured the quality of telenursing. CONCLUSIONS Although the telenurses experienced computerized decision support as both supporting and inhibiting, they preferred working with it. They also described how a computerized decision support system cannot replace telenurses' knowledge and competence, and that it should be considered as complementary.

[1]  Daphne Stannard,et al.  Clinical Wisdom and Interventions in Critical Care: A Thinking-In-action Approach , 1999 .

[2]  R. Wredling,et al.  Telephone advice nursing — callers' experiences , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  R. Gerber,et al.  Understanding technology in contemporary surgical nursing: a phenomenographic examination. , 1999, Nursing inquiry.

[4]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Telephone triage, expert systems and clinical expertise. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[5]  Elisabet Cedersund,et al.  Telephone nurses' experience of problems with telephone advice in Sweden. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.

[6]  Aksel Tjora,et al.  The technological mediation of the nursing-medical boundary , 2000 .

[7]  Srikant Sarangi,et al.  Real nursing? The development of telenursing. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  C. Finn Autonomy: an important component for nurses' job satisfaction. , 2001, International journal of nursing studies.

[9]  C. Pettinari,et al.  "Your ears become your eyes": managing the absence of visibility in NHS Direct. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[11]  B. Marklund,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of providing advice via a telephone care line. , 2006, British journal of nursing.

[12]  Isabella Scandurra,et al.  Building Usability into Health Informatics : Development and Evaluation of Information Systems for Shared Homecare , 2007 .

[13]  B Edwards,et al.  Telephone triage: how experienced nurses reach decisions. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  R. Grol,et al.  Safety of telephone triage in general practitioner cooperatives: do triage nurses correctly estimate urgency? , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[15]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Technology and humane nursing care: (ir)reconcilable or invented difference? , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  A. Barnard Alteration to will as an experience of technology and nursing. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[18]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  NHS Direct: consistency of triage outcomes , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[19]  Gloria Dall'Alba,et al.  'Carer and gatekeeper' - conflicting demands in nurses' experiences of telephone advisory services. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[20]  I. Holmström Decision aid software programs in telenursing: not used as intended? Experiences of Swedish telenurses. , 2007, Nursing & health sciences.

[21]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[22]  A. Höglund,et al.  The faceless encounter: ethical dilemmas in telephone nursing. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[23]  B Marklund,et al.  Computer-supported telephone nurse triage: an evaluation of medical quality and costs. , 2007, Journal of nursing management.

[24]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  NHS Direct and nurses--opportunity or monotony? , 2002, International journal of nursing studies.

[25]  B. Karsh Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[26]  Alicia O'Cathain,et al.  IN NURSING PRACTICE Nurses ’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct , 2014 .