Randomized phase 2 study of FcRn antagonist efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis

Objective To investigate safety and explore efficacy of efgartigimod (ARGX-113), an anti-neonatal Fc receptor immunoglobulin G1 Fc fragment, in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) with a history of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies, who were on stable standard-of-care myasthenia gravis (MG) treatment. Methods A phase 2, exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-center study is described. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 4 doses over a 3-week period of either 10 mg/kg IV efgartigimod or matched placebo combined with their standard-of-care therapy. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included efficacy (change from baseline to week 11 of Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Composite disease severity scores, and of the revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life scale), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity. Results Of the 35 screened patients, 24 were enrolled and randomized: 12 received efgartigimod and 12 placebo. Efgartigimod was well-tolerated in all patients, with no serious or severe adverse events reported, no relevant changes in vital signs or ECG findings observed, and no difference in adverse events between efgartigimod and placebo treatment. All patients treated with efgartigimod showed a rapid decrease in total immunoglobulin G (IgG) and anti-AChR autoantibody levels, and assessment using all 4 efficacy scales consistently demonstrated that 75% showed a rapid and long-lasting disease improvement. Conclusions Efgartigimod was safe and well-tolerated. The correlation between reduction of levels of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies and disease improvement suggests that reducing pathogenic autoantibodies with efgartigimod may offer an innovative approach to treat MG. Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that efgartigimod is safe and well-tolerated in patients with gMG.

[1]  R. Ober,et al.  Neonatal Fc receptor antagonist efgartigimod safely and sustainably reduces IgGs in humans , 2018, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  G. L. Masson,et al.  Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. , 2017, The Lancet. Neurology.

[3]  Dongying Chen,et al.  Herpes zoster in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical features, complications and risk factors , 2017, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[4]  M. Conaway,et al.  International clinimetric evaluation of the MG‐QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG‐QOL15r , 2016, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  J. Howard,et al.  Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on immunoglobulins in myasthenia gravis , 2016, Autoimmunity.

[6]  M. Benatar,et al.  International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis , 2016, Neurology.

[7]  A. Vincent,et al.  Pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis: update on disease types, models, and mechanisms , 2016, F1000Research.

[8]  H. Okajima,et al.  Incidence and risk factors for herpes zoster in patients undergoing liver transplantation , 2015, Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society.

[9]  Nils Erik Gilhus,et al.  Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  M. Benatar,et al.  A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase II study of eculizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis , 2013, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  M. Conaway,et al.  MG‐ADL: Still a relevant outcome measure , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  M. Conaway,et al.  The MG Composite , 2010, Neurology.

[13]  Huaizhou You,et al.  Comparing the Autoantibody Levels and Clinical Efficacy of Double Filtration Plasmapheresis, Immunoadsorption, and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Late‐onset Myasthenia Gravis , 2010, Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.

[14]  G. Vidarsson,et al.  The neonatal Fc receptor as therapeutic target in IgG-mediated autoimmune diseases , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[15]  A. Kaplan Therapeutic plasma exchange: core curriculum 2008. , 2008, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[16]  S. Akilesh,et al.  FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[17]  R. Ober,et al.  Engineering the Fc region of immunoglobulin G to modulate in vivo antibody levels , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  R. Lauzurica,et al.  Disseminated varicella infection in adult renal allograft recipients: role of mycophenolate mofetil. , 2003, Transplantation proceedings.

[19]  G. Wolfe,et al.  Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile , 1999, Neurology.

[20]  J. Kuks,et al.  Plasmapheresis in myasthenia gravis. A survey. , 1998, Transfusion science.

[21]  R. Barohn,et al.  Reliability Testing of the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Walsh,et al.  Hormonal control of intestinal Fc receptor gene expression and immunoglobulin transport in suckling rats. , 1993, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[23]  R. Mcmillan,et al.  The effect of corticosteroids on human IgG synthesis. , 1976, Journal of immunology.

[24]  D. Elmqvist Myasthenia Gravis , 1975, The Lancet.