Person-Based Optimization of Signal Timing

Recent studies have proposed the use of person-based frameworks for the optimization of traffic signal timing to minimize the total passenger delay experienced by passenger cars and buses at signalized intersections. The efficiency and applicability of existing efforts, however, have been limited by an assumption of fixed cycle lengths and deterministic bus arrival times. An existing algorithm for person-based optimization of signal timing for isolated intersections was extended to accommodate flexible cycle lengths and uncertain bus arrival times. To accommodate flexible cycle lengths, the mathematical program was redefined to minimize total passenger delay within a fixed planning horizon that allowed cycle lengths to vary within a feasible range. Two strategies were proposed to accommodate uncertain bus arrival times: (a) a robust optimization approach that conservatively minimized delays experienced in a worst-case scenario and (b) a blended strategy that combined deterministic optimization and rule-based green extensions. The proposed strategies were tested with numerical simulations of an intersection in State College, Pennsylvania. Results revealed that the flexible cycle length algorithm could significantly reduce bus passenger delay and total passenger delay, with negligible increases in car passenger delay. These results were robust to changes in both bus and car flows. For bus arrival times, the robust optimization strategy seemed to be more effective at low levels of uncertainty and the blended strategy at higher levels of uncertainty. The anticipated benefits decreased with increases in the intersection flow ratio because of the lower flexibility of signal timing at the intersection.

[1]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Person-Based Traffic Responsive Signal Control Optimization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  J. Bates,et al.  The valuation of reliability for personal travel , 2001 .

[3]  Sungsu Park,et al.  Prediction of Transit Vehicle Arrival Time for Signal Priority Control: Algorithm and Performance , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Jia Hu,et al.  Coordinated transit signal priority supporting transit progression under Connected Vehicle Technology , 2015 .

[5]  Eleni Christofa,et al.  Optimal Cycle-Length Formulas for Intersections With or Without Transit Signal Priority , 2016 .

[6]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons , 2009 .

[7]  Eleni Christofa,et al.  Estimation of Short-Term Bus Travel Time by Using Low-Resolution Automated Vehicle Location Data , 2016 .

[8]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations , 2003 .

[9]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: Optimal linear control and performance analysis , 2011 .

[10]  Hongchao Liu,et al.  Operational Strategy for Advanced Vehicle Location System–Based Transit Signal Priority , 2007 .

[11]  Yue Liu,et al.  A Dynamic Programming Approach for Optimal Signal Priority Control Upon Multiple High-Frequency Bus Requests , 2013, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[12]  Francois Dion,et al.  Evaluation of Service Reliability Impacts of Traffic Signal Priority Strategies for Bus Transit , 2003 .

[13]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  A Queueing and Variational Theory Approach to Estimating the Impacts of Bus Stops on Transit Signal Priority , 2017 .

[14]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Passengers’ Perception of and Behavioral Adaptation to Unreliability in Public Transportation , 2013 .

[15]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Using survival models to estimate bus travel times and associated uncertainties , 2017 .

[16]  Eleni Christofa,et al.  A New Stochastic Mesomodel for Optimizing Multi-modal Signal Settings for Networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Arterial traffic signal optimization: A person-based approach , 2016 .

[18]  A.G. Sims,et al.  The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic (SCAT) system philosophy and benefits , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[19]  Brendon Hemily,et al.  Transit Signal Priority (TSP): A Planning and Implementation Handbook , 2005 .

[20]  J. Lofberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508).

[21]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation , 2011 .

[22]  Hidenori Nakahara The Japanese Police , 1955 .

[23]  Luca Quadrifoglio,et al.  Person-Based Adaptive Priority Signal Control with Connected-Vehicle Information , 2015 .

[24]  R D Bretherton,et al.  THE SCOOT ON-LINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMISATION TECHNIQUE , 1982 .

[25]  Robert J. Vanderbei,et al.  Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems , 1995, Oper. Res..

[26]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Traffic Signal Optimization with Application of Transit Signal Priority to an Isolated Intersection , 2011 .

[27]  Xiaosi Zeng,et al.  A Real-Time Transit Signal Priority Control Model Considering Stochastic Bus Arrival Time , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.