Leadership Endorsement: The Role of Distributive and Procedural Behavior in Interpersonal and Intergroup Contexts

Previous research (Platow, Hoar, Reid, Harley, & Morrison, 1997) showed that the difference in the strength of endorsements provided for a distributively fair over an unfair leader in interpersonal contexts attenuates when the unfairness is ingroup-favoring in intergroup contexts. We extended this to the realm of procedural fairness, and manipulated a leader's distributive fairness, procedural fairness, and the interpersonal versus intergroup context of these behaviors. Results revealed independent intergroup attenuation effects as a function of distributive and procedural fairness; procedural fairness did not moderate the distributive fairness by social context interaction. These findings are discussed within a social identity framework.

[1]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The social psychology of stereotyping and group life , 1998 .

[2]  K. Kypri,et al.  Intergroup bias and self-evaluation: domain-specific self-esteem, threats to identity and dimensional importance. , 1997, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  T. Tyler The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[4]  S. Reid,et al.  Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. , 1997 .

[5]  M. Platow,et al.  Interpreting in‐group‐favouring allocations in the minimal group paradigm , 1997 .

[6]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Discrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Social Identity or Self-Interest? , 1996 .

[7]  J. Brockner,et al.  An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  M. Platow,et al.  Social identity and intergroup evaluative bias: Realistic categories and domain specific self‐esteem in a conflict setting , 1996 .

[9]  M. Platow,et al.  Social evaluations of fair and unfair allocators in interpersonal and intergroup situations , 1995 .

[10]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. , 1995 .

[11]  S. Ng,et al.  Distributive and procedural justice in interpersonal and intergroup situations: Issues, solutions, and extensions , 1995 .

[12]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. , 1994 .

[13]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  Scales: A Turbo Pascal 6.0 unit for presenting simple attitude scales , 1994 .

[14]  R. Dawes,et al.  Psychological perspectives on justice: Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives , 1993 .

[15]  N. Kerr,et al.  Role Schemata and Member Motivation in Task Groups , 1993 .

[16]  Matthew G. Chin,et al.  The effects of intergroup discrimination and social values on level of self‐esteem in the minimal group paradigm , 1993 .

[17]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  Self‐esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm , 1991 .

[19]  Daniel L. Wann,et al.  Die-Hard and Fair-Weather Fans: Effects of Identification on BIRGing and CORFing Tendencies , 1990 .

[20]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[21]  M. Platow,et al.  PREDICTING INTERGROUP FAIRNESS AND INGROUP BIAS IN THE MINIMAL GROUP PARADIGM , 1990 .

[22]  T. Tyler,et al.  Intrinsic versus Community-Based Justice Models: When Does Group Membership Matter?. , 1990 .

[23]  Susan V. Opotow Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction , 1990 .

[24]  M. Diehl The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings , 1990 .

[25]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[26]  M. Hogg,et al.  Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination , 1988 .

[27]  H. Wilke,et al.  Subordinates' endorsement of an allocating leader in a commons dilemma : An equity theoretical approach , 1988 .

[28]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[29]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[30]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. , 1987 .

[31]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[32]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. , 1986 .

[33]  George M. Alliger,et al.  A Comparison of Four Information Processing Models of Leadership and Social Perceptions , 1985 .

[34]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants' Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience , 1984 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Process Analysis , 1981, Plastics Process Analysis, Instrumentation, and Control.

[36]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police Encounters , 1980 .

[37]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[38]  John Thibaut,et al.  A Theory of Procedure , 1978 .

[39]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[40]  M. Deutsch Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[41]  G. W. Walster,et al.  Equity and Social Justice , 1975 .

[42]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[43]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[44]  L. Postman,et al.  Norms of word association , 1970 .

[45]  K. M. Miller FREE-ASSOCIATION RESPONSES OF ENGLISH AND AUSTRALIAN STUDENTS TO 100 WORDS FROM THE KENT-ROSANOFF WORD ASSOCIATION TEST , 1970 .

[46]  S. Schachter Deviation, rejection, and communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.