Environmental challenges of the chlor-alkali production: Seeking answers from a life cycle approach.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been used to assess the environmental sustainability of the chlor-alkali production in Europe. The three current technologies applied nowadays are mercury, diaphragm, and membrane cell technology. Despite, having achieved higher energy efficiencies since the introduction of membrane technology, energy consumption is still one of the most important issues in this sector. An emerging technology namely oxygen-depolarised cathodes (ODC) is suggested as a promising approach for reducing the electrolysis energy demand. However, its requirement of pure oxygen and the lack of production of hydrogen, which could otherwise be valorised, are controversial features for greener chlorine production. The aim of this work is to evaluate and compare the environmental profiles of the current and emerging technologies for chlorine production and to identify the main hot spots of the process. Salt mining, brine preparation, electrolysis technology and products treatment are included inside the system boundaries. Twelve environmental impact categories grouped into natural resources usage and environmental burdens are assessed from cradle to gate and further normalised and weighted. Furthermore, hydrogen valorisation, current density and allocation procedure are subjected to sensitivity analysis. Results show that the electrolysis stage is the main contributor to the environmental impacts due to energy consumption, causing 99.5-72% of these impacts. Mercury is the less environmentally sustainable technology, closely followed by diaphragm. This difference becomes bigger after normalisation, owing to hazardous waste generated by mercury technique. Conversely, best results are obtained for ODC instead of membrane scenario, although the reduction in energy requirements is lesser than expected (7%).

[1]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  André Bardow,et al.  Comparative LCA of multi-product processes with non-common products: a systematic approach applied to chlorine electrolysis technologies , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Niklas von der Assen,et al.  Industry-Cost-Curve Approach for Modeling the Environmental Impact of Introducing New Technologies in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  G. Norris The requirement for congruence in normalization , 2001 .

[5]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[6]  Agnès Jullien,et al.  LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete , 2010 .

[7]  Shang-Lien Lo,et al.  Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Daniel Weisser,et al.  A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies , 2007 .

[9]  P. Anastas,et al.  Green Chemistry , 2018, Environmental Science.

[10]  Pere Fullana,et al.  Environmental sustainability assessment in the process industry: A case study of waste-to-energy plants in Spain , 2014 .

[11]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[12]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts. A joint application of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Frozen Tilapia Fillets From Indonesian Lake‐Based and Pond‐Based Intensive Aquaculture Systems , 2010 .

[14]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs , 2010 .

[15]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[17]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Avoiding Co‐Product Allocation in Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2000 .

[19]  Tieyong Zuo,et al.  Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China , 2007 .

[20]  Eric Johnson Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[21]  Gustavo Arcia,et al.  A Framework for Sustainability , 2012 .

[22]  Xu Xu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of caustic soda production: a case study in China , 2014 .

[23]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing the environmental sustainability of ethanol from integrated biorefineries , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[24]  Norbert Wagner,et al.  Development of high-performance silver-based gas-diffusion electrodes for chlor-alkali electrolysis with oxygen depolarized cathodes , 2012 .

[25]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Dimethyl Carbonate Production: Comparison of a Novel Electrosynthesis Route Utilizing CO2 with a Commercial Oxidative Carbonylation Process , 2016 .

[26]  S. Sikdar,et al.  Framework for Sustainability Metrics , 2007 .

[27]  André Bardow,et al.  Cleaner chlorine production using oxygen depolarized cathodes? A life cycle assessment , 2014 .

[28]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Research challenges in process systems engineering , 2000 .

[29]  Brinkmann Thomas,et al.  Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali. Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) , 2014 .

[30]  Rubén Aldaco,et al.  Environmental Sustainability Normalization of Industrial Processes , 2009 .

[31]  R. Venterea Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change , 2009 .

[32]  Julie Zimmerman,et al.  Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[33]  Trinidad Gómez,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater treatment systems: a composite indicator approach. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  T. Murugesan,et al.  The chlor-alkali process: Work in Progress , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.