Aircraft noise immission modeling

This contribution to the CEAS special edition Aircraft Noise Generation and Assessment focuses on the simulation of the aircraft noise immission, i.e., the aircraft noise received on the ground. This process includes two steps, the description of the sound emission by the aircraft and the modeling of the sound propagation through the atmosphere. An overview is provided on how aircraft noise immission can be described and assessed by noise descriptors. These quantities can be derived from measurable and computable quantities like maximum sound levels, time-integrated sound levels and the number of aircraft movements. Moreover, a generation of novel noise indices which relate human reactions to noise is presented. Fundamentals of aircraft noise modeling are explained. First, this includes a classification of aircraft noise models into best practice and scientific models and their applicability to the noise mitigation measures described by ICAO’s Balanced Approach to Aircraft Noise Management. Furthermore, the overall workflow of a noise modeling task is explained as well the special role of noise model databases and the simulation of aircraft flight paths. The most common methods used to describe the sound propagation process through the atmosphere are introduced. This covers the modeling of the fundamental propagation effects which are used by all noise model types as well as a description of propagation effects which are of importance only for special modeling tasks and which normally require sophisticated physical approaches. The fundamental difference between best practice and scientific aircraft noise models—i.e., the source modeling—is described in detail thereafter. Best practice models are based on a simple source description. Moreover, a common approach is to combine emission and propagation using pre-calculated noise–power–distance tables. In contrast, scientific models are of multi-source type, i.e., they differentiate between particular noise-generating mechanisms—at least between engine noise and aerodynamic noise. This model type always requires a time step-based flightpath description, whereas the best practice models usually are based on a flightpath description by longer segments. Finally, the selected application examples are presented for both model categories. This covers the range from noise zoning over what-if studies for noise mitigation measures or definition of noise abatement flight procedures up to the modeling of noise reduction measures at the source. Finally, the application of scientific models in the aircraft design phase is explained.

[1]  M. F. Heidmann,et al.  Interim prediction method for fan and compressor source noise , 1975 .

[2]  Robert Hofmann,et al.  Zurich Aircraft Noise Index: An Index for the Assessment and Analysis of the Effects of Aircraft Noise on the Population , 2012 .

[3]  Kurt Heutschi,et al.  An engineering model for sound pressure in shadow zones based on numerical simulations , 2005 .

[4]  Russell H. Thomas,et al.  Progress of Aircraft System Noise Assessment with Uncertainty Quantification for the Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project , 2016 .

[5]  Sebastien Guerin,et al.  Airframe noise characteristics from flyover measurements and prediction , 2006 .

[6]  Berthold Vogelsang,et al.  AzB-2008 and ECAC Doc.29 – two modern European aircraft noise calculation models , 2010 .

[7]  Karl-Stéphane Rossignol Empirical prediction of flap tip noise. , 2011 .

[8]  Lothar Bertsch,et al.  Noise prediction toolbox used by the DLR aircraft noise working group , 2013 .

[9]  Jan Werner Delfs,et al.  Noise Prediction within Conceptual Aircraft Design , 2012 .

[10]  Werner Dobrzynski,et al.  Almost 40 Years of Airframe Noise Research: What Did We Achieve? , 2010 .

[11]  Sebastien Guerin,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Parametric Aircraft System Noise Prediction , 2019, Journal of Aircraft.

[12]  Casey L. Burley,et al.  Auralization of Hybrid Wing–Body Aircraft Flyover Noise from System Noise Predictions , 2013 .

[13]  J. Stone,et al.  Conventional profile coaxial jet noise prediction , 1983 .

[14]  Lothar Bertsch,et al.  Auralization of novel aircraft configurations , 2015 .

[15]  Eike Stumpf,et al.  Interdisciplinary Auralization of Take-off and Landing Procedures for Subjective Assessment in Virtual Reality Environments , 2012 .

[16]  James R. Stone,et al.  Jet Noise Modeling for Suppressed and Unsuppressed Aircraft in Simulated Flight , 2009 .

[17]  Zyun-iti Maekawa,et al.  Noise reduction by screens , 1968 .

[18]  Martin R. Fink Airframe Noise Prediction Method , 1977 .

[19]  Russell H. Thomas,et al.  Ground Noise Contour Prediction for A NASA Hybrid Wing Body Subsonic Transport Aircraft , 2017 .

[20]  Markus Lummer,et al.  Maggi-Rubinowicz Diffraction Correction for Ray-Tracing Calculations of Engine Noise Shielding , 2008 .

[21]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Framework for Aircraft Conceptual Design and Environmental Performance Studies , 2005 .

[22]  D. Heimann,et al.  A linearized Eulerian sound propagation model for studies of complex meteorological effects. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Umberto Iemma,et al.  DECISION MAKING BASED ON COMMUNITY NOISE ANNOYANCE IN THE MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZA- TION OF A COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT , 2013 .

[24]  Mathias Basner,et al.  Aircraft noise effects on sleep: application of the results of a large polysomnographic field study. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Karen Bernadette Kontos,et al.  Improved NASA-ANOPP Noise Prediction Computer Code for Advanced Subsonic Propulsion Systems. Volume 2; Fan Suppression Model Development , 1996 .

[26]  Christian Oliver Paschereit,et al.  Aircraft Noise Emission Model Accounting for Aircraft Flight Parameters , 2017 .

[27]  Jean Marc Wunderli,et al.  sonAIR – a GIS-Integrated Spectral Aircraft Noise Simulation Tool for Single Flight Prediction and Noise Mapping , 2018 .